by bayman » Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:07 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:49 pm
by mal » Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:57 pm
by bayman » Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:52 pm
mal wrote:BAYMAN I also mentioned on my LATE MAL that the poor girl can not steer.
I SAID IF A GOOD DRIVER WAS ON IT I WOULD DECLARE IT A SPESH.
Ive been on her[betting] in the past and I know of her inadequacies, maybe
in time with some confidence she will improve.
PAID $4-20 CA CHING CA CHING CA CHING![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If David Harding was on it I would have got $1-70
And yes her poor driving caused the horse to win.
Well spotted and analysed BAYguruMAN.
by scoob » Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:08 am
bayman wrote:mal wrote:BAYMAN I also mentioned on my LATE MAL that the poor girl can not steer.
I SAID IF A GOOD DRIVER WAS ON IT I WOULD DECLARE IT A SPESH.
Ive been on her[betting] in the past and I know of her inadequacies, maybe
in time with some confidence she will improve.
PAID $4-20 CA CHING CA CHING CA CHING![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If David Harding was on it I would have got $1-70
And yes her poor driving caused the horse to win.
Well spotted and analysed BAYguruMAN.
wrong mal her poor driving didn't cause her to win it was the cheat lane
by scoob » Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:09 am
by bayman » Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:15 am
scoob wrote:bayman wrote:mal wrote:BAYMAN I also mentioned on my LATE MAL that the poor girl can not steer.
I SAID IF A GOOD DRIVER WAS ON IT I WOULD DECLARE IT A SPESH.
Ive been on her[betting] in the past and I know of her inadequacies, maybe
in time with some confidence she will improve.
PAID $4-20 CA CHING CA CHING CA CHING![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If David Harding was on it I would have got $1-70
And yes her poor driving caused the horse to win.
Well spotted and analysed BAYguruMAN.
wrong mal her poor driving didn't cause her to win it was the cheat lane
Thats your argument isnt it bayman, her poor driving should've cost it the race, but the cheat lane just rewards her shit drive. Hope she learns from it anyway.
by mal » Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:23 am
by bayman » Sun Dec 31, 2006 11:32 am
mal wrote:Benefit of the doubt, womens intuition!
What about the drive on r1 humboldt tonight lads
by mal » Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:09 pm
by bayman » Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:00 pm
mal wrote:Humboldt in the death and kicked up to keep the fav. Dressed To Thrill
out 3 wide forever.
The tactic cost both Humboldt + Dressed To Thrill any chance of winning.
BAYMAN can you take the witness stand.
" Would Humboldt run a better race conceding the death to Dressed To Thrill
and in turn getting the coverted one out one back sweet seat''
by another grub » Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:25 pm
by bayman » Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:59 pm
another grub wrote:I saw the drive... she is a bligh on the industry.... get rid of her!!!!
by bayman » Mon Jan 01, 2007 1:31 am
another grub wrote:get rid of them both then!!!!
by SCD » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:46 pm
bayman wrote:obviously (there is my arguement again PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS NEEDED)
by bayman » Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:47 pm
scaffidi can't drive wrote:bayman wrote:obviously (there is my arguement again PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS NEEDED)
BAYMAN - spot on the money again - that drive on Jazzstar by Tiffaney Lee would be the worst of the day (not worst of the week - Kerryn Manning on Tamra Dawn hitting a wheel with a lap to go wins that) - but why come off the fence when she did and run into a pocket.. that Horse had drawn barrier 1 or 2 in probably 7 or 8 out of it's last 10 and at least it's last 5 starts and she just gets lost.. imagine if she drew barrier 6 - the horse would get beaten 100m every week..
by SCD » Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:36 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |