wycbloods wrote:Well Churches have told ASCA that there will be no u/21 game against you guys as part of the CUSA cup.
Churches need to lift their game IMO.
by Pidge » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:40 pm
wycbloods wrote:Well Churches have told ASCA that there will be no u/21 game against you guys as part of the CUSA cup.
by Magpies96 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:25 pm
Pidge wrote:wycbloods wrote:Well Churches have told ASCA that there will be no u/21 game against you guys as part of the CUSA cup.
Churches need to lift their game IMO.
by Mythbuster » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:26 pm
by Magpies96 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:32 pm
by spintwin » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:32 pm
Mythbuster wrote:I think you are on the money for once pidge, the association desperately needs some new faces and ideas added into the fold.
by Mythbuster » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:40 pm
spintwin wrote:Mythbuster wrote:I think you are on the money for once pidge, the association desperately needs some new faces and ideas added into the fold.
Nothing will ever change in this Assosiation while the old fuddy duddys are running it. We should be trying to promote the youth but once again they have let us down.
by Magpies96 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:43 pm
spintwin wrote:Mythbuster wrote:I think you are on the money for once pidge, the association desperately needs some new faces and ideas added into the fold.
Nothing will ever change in this Assosiation while the old fuddy duddys are running it. We should be trying to promote the youth but once again they have let us down.
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:49 pm
Magpies96 wrote:spintwin wrote:Mythbuster wrote:I think you are on the money for once pidge, the association desperately needs some new faces and ideas added into the fold.
Nothing will ever change in this Assosiation while the old fuddy duddys are running it. We should be trying to promote the youth but once again they have let us down.
To be fair, if no one puts up their hand to go on the executive committee what choice have they got?
They put out a questionnaire to all clubs, and one of the outcomes was more one day games, so they do listen. Maybe except Sat/Sun finals.
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:50 pm
Mythbuster wrote:spintwin wrote:Mythbuster wrote:I think you are on the money for once pidge, the association desperately needs some new faces and ideas added into the fold.
Nothing will ever change in this Assosiation while the old fuddy duddys are running it. We should be trying to promote the youth but once again they have let us down.
Maybe you should jump on board Spintwin???? Kick a few heads, get things rolling. I hear from a Vista mate of mine that you have had your hand put up for you.
by carey18 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:51 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:53 pm
carey18 wrote:Never get sunday finals in a church comp
by carey18 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:56 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:59 pm
carey18 wrote:Have always played Sat/Sun and it makes the game a lot more interesting.
by Magpies96 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:09 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:17 pm
Magpies96 wrote:Last vote I heard was two years ago, and the clubs voted in favour (Only just) but the executive still decided Sat/Sat.
by mattsy » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:20 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:22 pm
mattsy wrote:Personally i cannot understand why they do not play sat/sun finals. I remember in the old Independent Central days we even played sat/sun games during the minor round on several occasions during the season.
by mattsy » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:25 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:mattsy wrote:
Personally i cannot understand why they do not play sat/sun finals. I remember in the old Independent Central days we even played sat/sun games during the minor round on several occasions during the season.
When i played in the SCA it was the same, 2 minor round Sat/Sun games and finals Sat/Sun. I think it just tidys the seasons up bit more, also gives chance to avoid heat wave and NR like last seasons GF (which im sure Fitzroy are still rueing)
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:27 pm
automaticwicky wrote:Is there anyone who isnt or hasnt played with Para Vista on here.
by spintwin » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:32 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Magpies96 wrote:Last vote I heard was two years ago, and the clubs voted in favour (Only just) but the executive still decided Sat/Sat.
Hmm ok. I thought it was a tie but your probably right.
What i have always found quite ordinary is votes are given to each side instead of clubs as a whole so someone like Para Vista or Enfield have 3 or 4 votes and someone like AC Blues get 1..
Pretty ordinary setup
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |