Could be the only way to stay in front in the batting trophy
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
by Executive Member » Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:37 pm
by Masha » Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:58 pm
Honda07 wrote:Executive Member wrote:Hey how did the fill in keeper go
He told me he couldnt move until yesterday
He was ok - steady job - I knew he wouldnt beable to move. Ha poor old boy.
by Masha » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:00 pm
by Browny25 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:02 pm
Masha wrote:So I decided to make a venture down to my first Tuesday training session, and was extremely shocked an disappointed with what I saw!!!! 3 juniors, 1 D grader and Luke Nelson. For a club with 4 sides, and the A grade especially batting on the weekend, I would've expected a massive turnout. Anyways, got a good session in with the bowling machine, only got bowled 12 times and caught 7 times with 3 buckets of ballsoh hang on...that was Luke haha. Fair to say that's the last Tuesday session i will attend. Thanks for the heads up.....where's the love????
by Browny25 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:03 pm
by Masha » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:26 pm
browny2323 wrote:Yeah fairly dissapointed that I cant play on saturday, but got a good feeling that the lads will get the job done.
Would be good to see young Nelly spend some time at the crease aswell.
by Executive Member » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:29 pm
Masha wrote:browny2323 wrote:Yeah fairly dissapointed that I cant play on saturday, but got a good feeling that the lads will get the job done.
Would be good to see young Nelly spend some time at the crease aswell.
Nelly definitely needs some time at the crease for some confidence. Has the skill, I noticed last night when I was operating the Bowling machine, that he doesn't committ his feet when playing drives especially and therefore plays away from his body a lot, or reaches at the ball. A big no no, unless you have the hand eye co-ordination of international cricketers.
A few more sessions with the machine and if I can help him along with some minor technical glitches then you could see Nelly reach a good level. Not saying I am awesome, just I can see what he is doing wrong and I want to help him fix it. What is that saying about teaching....those that can't do teach?? Very applicable to me
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:35 pm
Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:browny2323 wrote:Yeah fairly dissapointed that I cant play on saturday, but got a good feeling that the lads will get the job done.
Would be good to see young Nelly spend some time at the crease aswell.
Nelly definitely needs some time at the crease for some confidence. Has the skill, I noticed last night when I was operating the Bowling machine, that he doesn't committ his feet when playing drives especially and therefore plays away from his body a lot, or reaches at the ball. A big no no, unless you have the hand eye co-ordination of international cricketers.
A few more sessions with the machine and if I can help him along with some minor technical glitches then you could see Nelly reach a good level. Not saying I am awesome, just I can see what he is doing wrong and I want to help him fix it. What is that saying about teaching....those that can't do teach?? Very applicable to me
Be nice if you had enough balls for a decent session but after 20 ballas you have to stop and pick them all up again![]()
very hard to get a good net going with the bowling machine
Iwas when are the balls arriving
by Masha » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:38 pm
Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:browny2323 wrote:Yeah fairly dissapointed that I cant play on saturday, but got a good feeling that the lads will get the job done.
Would be good to see young Nelly spend some time at the crease aswell.
Nelly definitely needs some time at the crease for some confidence. Has the skill, I noticed last night when I was operating the Bowling machine, that he doesn't committ his feet when playing drives especially and therefore plays away from his body a lot, or reaches at the ball. A big no no, unless you have the hand eye co-ordination of international cricketers.
A few more sessions with the machine and if I can help him along with some minor technical glitches then you could see Nelly reach a good level. Not saying I am awesome, just I can see what he is doing wrong and I want to help him fix it. What is that saying about teaching....those that can't do teach?? Very applicable to me
Be nice if you had enough balls for a decent session but after 20 ballas you have to stop and pick them all up again![]()
very hard to get a good net going with the bowling machine
Iwas when are the balls arriving
by Executive Member » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:38 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:browny2323 wrote:Yeah fairly dissapointed that I cant play on saturday, but got a good feeling that the lads will get the job done.
Would be good to see young Nelly spend some time at the crease aswell.
Nelly definitely needs some time at the crease for some confidence. Has the skill, I noticed last night when I was operating the Bowling machine, that he doesn't committ his feet when playing drives especially and therefore plays away from his body a lot, or reaches at the ball. A big no no, unless you have the hand eye co-ordination of international cricketers.
A few more sessions with the machine and if I can help him along with some minor technical glitches then you could see Nelly reach a good level. Not saying I am awesome, just I can see what he is doing wrong and I want to help him fix it. What is that saying about teaching....those that can't do teach?? Very applicable to me
Be nice if you had enough balls for a decent session but after 20 ballas you have to stop and pick them all up again![]()
very hard to get a good net going with the bowling machine
Iwas when are the balls arriving
When you think about it, in a normal net session you are lucky to face 3 balls a minute, you face around 10 per minute with the machine. We have another 24 balls coming this week, we only use ours out in the middle and have the next few having a hit spread out. We will only be using ours for batsmen's weaknesses, that way they should only be getting hit to the one vicinity.Don't you have someone collecting them as you use them.
by Masha » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:41 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:
Nelly definitely needs some time at the crease for some confidence. Has the skill, I noticed last night when I was operating the Bowling machine, that he doesn't committ his feet when playing drives especially and therefore plays away from his body a lot, or reaches at the ball. A big no no, unless you have the hand eye co-ordination of international cricketers.
A few more sessions with the machine and if I can help him along with some minor technical glitches then you could see Nelly reach a good level. Not saying I am awesome, just I can see what he is doing wrong and I want to help him fix it. What is that saying about teaching....those that can't do teach?? Very applicable to me
Be nice if you had enough balls for a decent session but after 20 ballas you have to stop and pick them all up again![]()
very hard to get a good net going with the bowling machine
Iwas when are the balls arriving
When you think about it, in a normal net session you are lucky to face 3 balls a minute, you face around 10 per minute with the machine. We have another 24 balls coming this week, we only use ours out in the middle and have the next few having a hit spread out. We will only be using ours for batsmen's weaknesses, that way they should only be getting hit to the one vicinity.Don't you have someone collecting them as you use them.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:53 pm
Masha wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:
When you think about it, in a normal net session you are lucky to face 3 balls a minute, you face around 10 per minute with the machine. We have another 24 balls coming this week, we only use ours out in the middle and have the next few having a hit spread out. We will only be using ours for batsmen's weaknesses, that way they should only be getting hit to the one vicinity.Don't you have someone collecting them as you use them.
Yeah, 3 balls a minute, 1 is pace, 1 is spin and the other a slow medium. When in cricket will this ever happen to you? Gets frustrating and you can't settled.
Not sure about only using it for the batsman's weaknesses. I agree you have to use it for this, but also have to chuck in some variables. Players also need to keep there standards up in the other areas of their batting.
by Masha » Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:12 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Masha wrote:
Yeah, 3 balls a minute, 1 is pace, 1 is spin and the other a slow medium. When in cricket will this ever happen to you? Gets frustrating and you can't settled.
Not sure about only using it for the batsman's weaknesses. I agree you have to use it for this, but also have to chuck in some variables. Players also need to keep there standards up in the other areas of their batting.
We got all of our players to write their weaknesses down and we'll set it up differently each session, it's too much rooting around to make adjustments. We've been using a brand new mat so that gives a fair bit of variance aswell. The last thing we want is for players to be out there spanking the ball around because it's coming faster and right in there slot.
It's new atm and everyone wants a crack at it, we've had a couple of blokes facing at 150 and in a prick of a length, you don't realize how slow some of the bowlers getting around are.
When we've come across quickies we've predicted about 135-140, after seeing the machine spit them out they appear to be more like 120-130.
by Executive Member » Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:34 am
Masha wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Masha wrote:
Yeah, 3 balls a minute, 1 is pace, 1 is spin and the other a slow medium. When in cricket will this ever happen to you? Gets frustrating and you can't settled.
Not sure about only using it for the batsman's weaknesses. I agree you have to use it for this, but also have to chuck in some variables. Players also need to keep there standards up in the other areas of their batting.
We got all of our players to write their weaknesses down and we'll set it up differently each session, it's too much rooting around to make adjustments. We've been using a brand new mat so that gives a fair bit of variance aswell. The last thing we want is for players to be out there spanking the ball around because it's coming faster and right in there slot.
It's new atm and everyone wants a crack at it, we've had a couple of blokes facing at 150 and in a prick of a length, you don't realize how slow some of the bowlers getting around are.
When we've come across quickies we've predicted about 135-140, after seeing the machine spit them out they appear to be more like 120-130.
I got a fair idea of pace when I played for Para Hills, when a guy was clocked at 130ish, he was extremely sharp. When I compare bowlers to him, I am thinking most of the PDCA bowlers would be lucky to reach 120. Saying that, 120 to me is still reasonably quick, so I wouldn't want to be facing any quicker.
The quickest I think I've faced is Jim McCarthy, others have slipped my mind. I haven't faced Davies from SW but heard he bowls with plenty of heat. Searle was quick but I don't think he'd be in the same class as those 2.
by Iwasthere84 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:51 am
Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Masha wrote:
Yeah, 3 balls a minute, 1 is pace, 1 is spin and the other a slow medium. When in cricket will this ever happen to you? Gets frustrating and you can't settled.
Not sure about only using it for the batsman's weaknesses. I agree you have to use it for this, but also have to chuck in some variables. Players also need to keep there standards up in the other areas of their batting.
We got all of our players to write their weaknesses down and we'll set it up differently each session, it's too much rooting around to make adjustments. We've been using a brand new mat so that gives a fair bit of variance aswell. The last thing we want is for players to be out there spanking the ball around because it's coming faster and right in there slot.
It's new atm and everyone wants a crack at it, we've had a couple of blokes facing at 150 and in a prick of a length, you don't realize how slow some of the bowlers getting around are.
When we've come across quickies we've predicted about 135-140, after seeing the machine spit them out they appear to be more like 120-130.
I got a fair idea of pace when I played for Para Hills, when a guy was clocked at 130ish, he was extremely sharp. When I compare bowlers to him, I am thinking most of the PDCA bowlers would be lucky to reach 120. Saying that, 120 to me is still reasonably quick, so I wouldn't want to be facing any quicker.
The quickest I think I've faced is Jim McCarthy, others have slipped my mind. I haven't faced Davies from SW but heard he bowls with plenty of heat. Searle was quick but I don't think he'd be in the same class as those 2.
I will relive a couple of oldies
Laverty from The Lodge was very sharp - glad I only faced him in the nets![]()
Hayes brothers from ATCO never gave you a break
cant remember the guys names from Riverside but had two lefties with plenty of heat
by Masha » Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:10 am
Iwasthere84 wrote:Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:
I got a fair idea of pace when I played for Para Hills, when a guy was clocked at 130ish, he was extremely sharp. When I compare bowlers to him, I am thinking most of the PDCA bowlers would be lucky to reach 120. Saying that, 120 to me is still reasonably quick, so I wouldn't want to be facing any quicker.
The quickest I think I've faced is Jim McCarthy, others have slipped my mind. I haven't faced Davies from SW but heard he bowls with plenty of heat. Searle was quick but I don't think he'd be in the same class as those 2.
I will relive a couple of oldies
Laverty from The Lodge was very sharp - glad I only faced him in the nets![]()
Hayes brothers from ATCO never gave you a break
cant remember the guys names from Riverside but had two lefties with plenty of heat
Masha, problems with training is now we are all playing and participating in Friday nights its a hard task to commit to Tues, thurs, friday and all day saturday, and then expect you back at the club for a drink. We will review our tues night session next comm meeting. The Jugs company have said balls are 2 weeks away. They were ordered 5weeks ago so not a lot I can do. We could look elsewhere but the prices per ball are huge.
by Masha » Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:11 am
Iwasthere84 wrote:
Masha, problems with training is now we are all playing and participating in Friday nights its a hard task to commit to Tues, thurs, friday and all day saturday, and then expect you back at the club for a drink. We will review our tues night session next comm meeting. The Jugs company have said balls are 2 weeks away. They were ordered 5weeks ago so not a lot I can do. We could look elsewhere but the prices per ball are huge.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:16 am
Masha wrote:Iwasthere84 wrote:
Masha, problems with training is now we are all playing and participating in Friday nights its a hard task to commit to Tues, thurs, friday and all day saturday, and then expect you back at the club for a drink. We will review our tues night session next comm meeting. The Jugs company have said balls are 2 weeks away. They were ordered 5weeks ago so not a lot I can do. We could look elsewhere but the prices per ball are huge.
How much do they slug per ball??
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:18 am
Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Masha wrote:
Yeah, 3 balls a minute, 1 is pace, 1 is spin and the other a slow medium. When in cricket will this ever happen to you? Gets frustrating and you can't settled.
Not sure about only using it for the batsman's weaknesses. I agree you have to use it for this, but also have to chuck in some variables. Players also need to keep there standards up in the other areas of their batting.
We got all of our players to write their weaknesses down and we'll set it up differently each session, it's too much rooting around to make adjustments. We've been using a brand new mat so that gives a fair bit of variance aswell. The last thing we want is for players to be out there spanking the ball around because it's coming faster and right in there slot.
It's new atm and everyone wants a crack at it, we've had a couple of blokes facing at 150 and in a prick of a length, you don't realize how slow some of the bowlers getting around are.
When we've come across quickies we've predicted about 135-140, after seeing the machine spit them out they appear to be more like 120-130.
I got a fair idea of pace when I played for Para Hills, when a guy was clocked at 130ish, he was extremely sharp. When I compare bowlers to him, I am thinking most of the PDCA bowlers would be lucky to reach 120. Saying that, 120 to me is still reasonably quick, so I wouldn't want to be facing any quicker.
The quickest I think I've faced is Jim McCarthy, others have slipped my mind. I haven't faced Davies from SW but heard he bowls with plenty of heat. Searle was quick but I don't think he'd be in the same class as those 2.
I will relive a couple of oldies
Laverty from The Lodge was very sharp - glad I only faced him in the nets![]()
Hayes brothers from ATCO never gave you a break
cant remember the guys names from Riverside but had two lefties with plenty of heat
by Iwasthere84 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:39 am
Masha wrote:Iwasthere84 wrote:Executive Member wrote:Masha wrote:
I got a fair idea of pace when I played for Para Hills, when a guy was clocked at 130ish, he was extremely sharp. When I compare bowlers to him, I am thinking most of the PDCA bowlers would be lucky to reach 120. Saying that, 120 to me is still reasonably quick, so I wouldn't want to be facing any quicker.
The quickest I think I've faced is Jim McCarthy, others have slipped my mind. I haven't faced Davies from SW but heard he bowls with plenty of heat. Searle was quick but I don't think he'd be in the same class as those 2.
I will relive a couple of oldies
Laverty from The Lodge was very sharp - glad I only faced him in the nets![]()
Hayes brothers from ATCO never gave you a break
cant remember the guys names from Riverside but had two lefties with plenty of heat
Masha, problems with training is now we are all playing and participating in Friday nights its a hard task to commit to Tues, thurs, friday and all day saturday, and then expect you back at the club for a drink. We will review our tues night session next comm meeting. The Jugs company have said balls are 2 weeks away. They were ordered 5weeks ago so not a lot I can do. We could look elsewhere but the prices per ball are huge.
Yeah ok Iwas84, I see your point. However, the T20 concept was only just brought in, and as I'm led to believe the Tuesday numbers have always being low. I can't understand how a team in Grade 1 who has ambitions to be successful can only get by with training once a week. If you are going to take it seriously, surely the Tuesday has to be a go as well. Just look at footy, they implement the 2 days per week training plus Saturday, otherwise you don't get the Tiger bucks on Sat night. I know players don't get paid at the Lodge for cricket (except maybe Sibbs), but maybe a similar concept may be the way to go. It does make it hard now though with the T20. That would make it 4 out of 7 days up at the club. I agree that would be pushing the friendship. Now that I have gone to a Tuesday sesh I can guarantee that unless there is more than 5 people there, I won't do it again as It will be wasting my Tuesday night.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |