Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2010/11

[Tiger Couple]

From my last post but without actually writing it I realised from coverking's comments that unlike Turf in ASCA Section 1 is A Grade and Section 2 like B Grade so it would seem reasonable to take a legit A Grade side into Section 1.

I was not really comparing Turf and ASCA just I know Turf very well and don't know much about ASCA and I incorrectly assumed because you have plenty of Grades (7 Sections from memory) that the top 1 - 3 Sections would be of a high and competitive nature but on getting the info from you guys I know see that is not the case.

By the sounds ASCA would be made not to take them in to Section 1 as it will only stengthen the Comp. Finding which grade to put there B Grade in may be harder but I guess that will be trial by error and not a hold up in excepting them.

[Wizard of Oz]

From my last post but without actually writing it I realised from coverking's comments that unlike Turf in ASCA Section 1 is A Grade and Section 2 like B Grade so it would seem reasonable to take a legit A Grade side into Section 1.

I was not really comparing Turf and ASCA just I know Turf very well and don't know much about ASCA and I incorrectly assumed because you have plenty of Grades (7 Sections from memory) that the top 1 - 3 Sections would be of a high and competitive nature but on getting the info from you guys I know see that is not the case.

By the sounds ASCA would be made not to take them in to Section 1 as it will only stengthen the Comp. Finding which grade to put there B Grade in may be harder but I guess that will be trial by error and not a hold up in excepting them.

Incorrect PUNTER. Section 2 still has A Grade sides in it.

Speaking of which, what is happening with Warradale ? Are they going up ? And if not why not ?

[bazza1]

From my last post but without actually writing it I realised from coverking's comments that unlike Turf in ASCA Section 1 is A Grade and Section 2 like B Grade so it would seem reasonable to take a legit A Grade side into Section 1.

I was not really comparing Turf and ASCA just I know Turf very well and don't know much about ASCA and I incorrectly assumed because you have plenty of Grades (7 Sections from memory) that the top 1 - 3 Sections would be of a high and competitive nature but on getting the info from you guys I know see that is not the case.

By the sounds ASCA would be made not to take them in to Section 1 as it will only stengthen the Comp. Finding which grade to put there B Grade in may be harder but I guess that will be trial by error and not a hold up in excepting them.

Incorrect PUNTER. Section 2 still has A Grade sides in it.

Speaking of which, what is happening with Warradale ? Are they going up ? And if not why not ?

I think they are doing what Panorama did a couple of years ago, playing the TOO OLD for section 1 card.

[Jabber]

warradale have been too old for section one for about 15 years.

From my last post but without actually writing it I realised from coverking's comments that unlike Turf in ASCA Section 1 is A Grade and Section 2 like B Grade so it would seem reasonable to take a legit A Grade side into Section 1.

I was not really comparing Turf and ASCA just I know Turf very well and don't know much about ASCA and I incorrectly assumed because you have plenty of Grades (7 Sections from memory) that the top 1 - 3 Sections would be of a high and competitive nature but on getting the info from you guys I know see that is not the case.

By the sounds ASCA would be made not to take them in to Section 1 as it will only stengthen the Comp. Finding which grade to put there B Grade in may be harder but I guess that will be trial by error and not a hold up in excepting them.

Incorrect PUNTER. Section 2 still has A Grade sides in it.

Speaking of which, what is happening with Warradale ? Are they going up ? And if not why not ?

I think they are doing what Panorama did a couple of years ago, playing the TOO OLD for section 1 card.

[Wizard of Oz]

From my last post but without actually writing it I realised from coverking's comments that unlike Turf in ASCA Section 1 is A Grade and Section 2 like B Grade so it would seem reasonable to take a legit A Grade side into Section 1.

I was not really comparing Turf and ASCA just I know Turf very well and don't know much about ASCA and I incorrectly assumed because you have plenty of Grades (7 Sections from memory) that the top 1 - 3 Sections would be of a high and competitive nature but on getting the info from you guys I know see that is not the case.

By the sounds ASCA would be made not to take them in to Section 1 as it will only stengthen the Comp. Finding which grade to put there B Grade in may be harder but I guess that will be trial by error and not a hold up in excepting them.

Incorrect PUNTER. Section 2 still has A Grade sides in it.

Speaking of which, what is happening with Warradale ? Are they going up ? And if not why not ?

I think they are doing what Panorama did a couple of years ago, playing the TOO OLD for section 1 card.

I have a mate who played his first year there this season thats all. Cant believe they wouldn't want to go up ?

[The Dark Knight]

warradale have been too old for section one for about 15 years.

From my last post but without actually writing it I realised from coverking's comments that unlike Turf in ASCA Section 1 is A Grade and Section 2 like B Grade so it would seem reasonable to take a legit A Grade side into Section 1.

I was not really comparing Turf and ASCA just I know Turf very well and don't know much about ASCA and I incorrectly assumed because you have plenty of Grades (7 Sections from memory) that the top 1 - 3 Sections would be of a high and competitive nature but on getting the info from you guys I know see that is not the case.

By the sounds ASCA would be made not to take them in to Section 1 as it will only stengthen the Comp. Finding which grade to put there B Grade in may be harder but I guess that will be trial by error and not a hold up in excepting them.

Incorrect PUNTER. Section 2 still has A Grade sides in it.

Speaking of which, what is happening with Warradale ? Are they going up ? And if not why not ?

I think they are doing what Panorama did a couple of years ago, playing the TOO OLD for section 1 card.

Gold Jabber

[Westsider]

I dominated Warradale last year. And I'm too old for section 1.

[The Dark Knight]

I dominated Warradale last year. And I'm too old for section 1.

Yes, Too old..............

[The Hound]

Any news from the meeting last night on Cove, are they in or staying in SCA??

[wycbloods]

It was good to see the Cove representatives give a good honest appraisal of their club and where they thought they thought was the best fit for them, whilst acknowledging they will accept whatever decision we make, in regards to where their sides start. They also spoke of their communications with the SCA and their desire to keep them as informed as possible.

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change). The only catch here is that the other clubs currently in our comp will need to formally accept them at the AGM, which shouldn't be a problem, as the Executive will be recommending that we accpet them.

South Road will be the club to go down from 1 to 2 and their b's from 2 to 3.

Adelaide Indians from 2 to 3. Clapham from 4 to 3. Warradale and Westminster from 3 to 4.

All others to far up in the air as it will depend on other clubs having 4th or 5th teams which we don't know as yet.

[shoe boy]

It was good to see the Cove representatives give a good honest appraisal of their club and where they thought they thought was the best fit for them, whilst acknowledging they will accept whatever decision we make, in regards to where their sides start. They also spoke of their communications with the SCA and their desire to keep them as informed as possible.

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change). The only catch here is that the other clubs currently in our comp will need to formally accept them at the AGM, which shouldn't be a problem, as the Executive will be recommending that we accpet them.

South Road will be the club to go down from 1 to 2 and their b's from 2 to 3.

Adelaide Indians from 2 to 3. Clapham from 4 to 3. Warradale and Westminster from 3 to 4.

All others to far up in the air as it will depend on other clubs having 4th or 5th teams which we don't know as yet.

Representatives? You mean Paul came with support?

[woodublieve12]

It was good to see the Cove representatives give a good honest appraisal of their club and where they thought they thought was the best fit for them, whilst acknowledging they will accept whatever decision we make, in regards to where their sides start. They also spoke of their communications with the SCA and their desire to keep them as informed as possible.

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change). The only catch here is that the other clubs currently in our comp will need to formally accept them at the AGM, which shouldn't be a problem, as the Executive will be recommending that we accpet them.

South Road will be the club to go down from 1 to 2 and their b's from 2 to 3.

Adelaide Indians from 2 to 3. Clapham from 4 to 3. Warradale and Westminster from 3 to 4.

All others to far up in the air as it will depend on other clubs having 4th or 5th teams which we don't know as yet.

Representatives? You mean Paul came with support?

Great news for the ASCA... Hopefully other clubs agree... Which i think they will...

[wycbloods]

It was good to see the Cove representatives give a good honest appraisal of their club and where they thought they thought was the best fit for them, whilst acknowledging they will accept whatever decision we make, in regards to where their sides start. They also spoke of their communications with the SCA and their desire to keep them as informed as possible.

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change). The only catch here is that the other clubs currently in our comp will need to formally accept them at the AGM, which shouldn't be a problem, as the Executive will be recommending that we accpet them.

South Road will be the club to go down from 1 to 2 and their b's from 2 to 3.

Adelaide Indians from 2 to 3. Clapham from 4 to 3. Warradale and Westminster from 3 to 4.

All others to far up in the air as it will depend on other clubs having 4th or 5th teams which we don't know as yet.

Representatives? You mean Paul came with support?

That would be right SB. Seem to be a well presented club.

[shoe boy]

Representatives? You mean Paul came with support?[/quote]

That would be right SB. Seem to be a well presented club.[/quote]

Well thats a change

[top gun]

Representatives? You mean Paul came with support?

That would be right SB. Seem to be a well presented club.[/quote]

Well thats a change [/quote]

The club as a group is looking forward to being part of ASC.Not going to miss SB little digs at the cove,noarlunga should have jumped when they had the chance last year now your stuck.

[Jabber]

Well thats a change

Your earlier post stating that you don't have any personal issues with the cove seems to be holding less and less water with everything you post on here. I'm sure most people on here have learned to take your comments with a grain of salt as they are obviously overridden by a personal issue that you have with the cove.

Welcome to Cove, this is great for the competition, and i reckon it will be great for the Cove Cricket Club.

[The Hound]

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change).

Yeah only because they will not be able to fill the Section 6 side

[shoe boy]

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change).

Yeah only because they will not be able to fill the Section 6 side

And going by the past couple of years will struggle to field a B side.FACT

[wycbloods]

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change).

Yeah only because they will not be able to fill the Section 6 side

And going by the past couple of years will struggle to field a B side.FACT

You wouldn't know a fact if it hit you in the face SB. Seriously your issue with Cove is laughable.

The subject to change part is not a concern for Cove's sides or player numbers but based on what other clubs are doing in the grades above them which possibly will move them either up or down.

They fielded a C grade side last year for 7 of the 12 games and the b's played the whole year, as far as i understand, albeit with a young side. Cove will grow as a result of joining ASCA can the same be said for the clubs staying in SCA?

[Madportsman]

Cove will start in sections 1, 4 and 6 at this stage(only the lower grades are subject to change).

Yeah only because they will not be able to fill the Section 6 side

And going by the past couple of years will struggle to field a B side.FACT

SB - keep your sour grapes for cove down at Noarlunga. The only club on this forum you can bag is wyc.