Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:51 pmPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:57 pmAerie wrote:Will a draw be enough for TTG to win the premiership or is there compulsory declaration? Do they still go in to Monday if needed? Rules seem to change every season - can't keep up. Match being played at Glenelg Oval.
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:10 pmheater31 wrote:Aerie wrote:Will a draw be enough for TTG to win the premiership or is there compulsory declaration? Do they still go in to Monday if needed? Rules seem to change every season - can't keep up. Match being played at Glenelg Oval.
Why would the rules change regarding declarations? Would think only the Monday would be used as a reserve day if the weekend was a washout.
Interesting I was flicking through one of the clubs that is over 100 years old history books and back in the early parts of last century the grand final was played over 4 consecutive weekends in some cases.
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:20 pmFooty Smart wrote:heater31 wrote:Aerie wrote:Will a draw be enough for TTG to win the premiership or is there compulsory declaration? Do they still go in to Monday if needed? Rules seem to change every season - can't keep up. Match being played at Glenelg Oval.
Why would the rules change regarding declarations? Would think only the Monday would be used as a reserve day if the weekend was a washout.
Interesting I was flicking through one of the clubs that is over 100 years old history books and back in the early parts of last century the grand final was played over 4 consecutive weekends in some cases.
The last time TTG played in a 2 day GF it went into the Monday due to rain. Was against your mob Heater
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:36 pmFooty Smart wrote:the star wrote:Fair chase by Northern Districts B grade yesterday 310 in 70 overs, i believe they were 1/0 as well.
Sure was TS, think they were 3 fa 40 odd when I left. ND been slack on updating mycricket so cant see who made the runs
Silly by Woodville, had them on toast with the bat, yet hit out on the second day with a few lads caught on the boundary. All they had to do was bat for another 30-40 minutes and was game over!
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:33 pmWillo wrote:heater31 wrote:Lame Choice wrote:Aerie wrote:Well done to Port Adelaide and Tea Tree Gully on making the final. I believe Port have 4 A Grade Premierships (last in 1967/68 with Neil Hawke and Eric Freeman) and TTG have one from 1995/96. Obviously TTG have plenty of limited-over premierships from the last few years, but would be keen on the big one.
Other Grades Finals:
B Grade - Kensington vs Northern Districts
C Grade - East Torrens vs Glenelg
D Grade - Tea Tree Gully vs Glenelg
U16R - Kensington vs West Torrens
U16W - Northern Districts vs Tea Tree Gully
U14R - West Torrens vs Kensington
U14W - Sturt vs Kensington
Tea Tree Gully also took out the Club Championship.
Kensington and West Torrens still producing quality juniors then.
Browns have 4 of the last 9 U/14 premierships and Eagles 5 of the last 7 U/16 premierships. Although interestingly, with all the recent Kensi U/14 premierships, there hasn't been a U/16 flag for 20 years - so they'll be keen for that one.
There could be a reason for that...... School Cricket and any decent ones left after that are probably playing seniors....
Interesting point Heater, agree entirely.
I know at WT, they believe you play in your grade and wont push kids up. I know SACA have the other view, that kids should be pushed up to test them, etc. Which one is correct, who knows?
Our A's this year had 4 17 year olds at times in the team, all who did not play up when in Under 16's, all won the 16 Reds Premiership. Other clubs have pushed up kids, for instance Glenelg do it and have had kids in B, C and D, but all those similar kids are still in B and C now, so has it worked? There is something to be said for team success and building a winning culture.
I reckon the standard of Under 16's has dropped over the years, due to College cricket and kids playing in Seniors now.
Makes for an interesting debate, I do believe talented kids should play up (although in D's is a waste of time, even C's to an extent), but respect my Clubs view in not doing this also.
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:57 pmPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:20 amPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:23 amPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:54 amSlots It Through wrote:Andrew McDonald expected to be an IN for Port Adelaide this week.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:39 amSlots It Through wrote:Andrew McDonald expected to be an IN for Port Adelaide this week.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:54 pmPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:42 pmPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:23 pmPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:55 pmPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 7:40 pmPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:33 pmStumps wrote:Port 2/61
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:18 amTony Clifton wrote:Stumps wrote:Port 2/61
With Ludemann and McDonald to come. Game over surely.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:18 pmPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:24 pm