catchit wrote:" someone like you cant question commitment"
There was supposed to be 'his' in there.. my bad
by Mr Miraculous » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:09 pm
catchit wrote:" someone like you cant question commitment"
by catchit » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:17 pm
Mr Miraculous wrote:catchit wrote:" someone like you cant question commitment"
There was supposed to be 'his' in there.. my bad
by Mr Miraculous » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:27 pm
catchit wrote:Mr Miraculous wrote:catchit wrote:" someone like you cant question commitment"
There was supposed to be 'his' in there.. my bad
all good... so you say who is oz to question jamies commitment, i thought oz playing with him for so many years would be enough, you really get to no if people that way and its not long before you work out if they play for there team or for them self which sort of suggests what sort of people they are as well...
by cricket1012010 » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:10 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
by fanta » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:16 pm
cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
how can you say thaqt oz... yes they were the best team all yr but as everyone would say that means NOTHING!!! in a grand final... rose and crown had them on toast![]()
![]()
![]()
start of the season R&C where no chance according to people like you,,, they proved you wrong then when it came to finals they where nochance to beat 1 tree hill,,, then in the big GF they where no chance again but they still done what no team could do all yr and roled them for 148 and for a team they had "NO CHANCE" i think that is a grand final winning effort!!!!!!!!
by Mr Miraculous » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:16 pm
cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
how can you say thaqt oz... yes they were the best team all yr but as everyone would say that means NOTHING!!! in a grand final... rose and crown had them on toast![]()
![]()
![]()
start of the season R&C where no chance according to people like you,,, they proved you wrong then when it came to finals they where nochance to beat 1 tree hill,,, then in the big GF they where no chance again but they still done what no team could do all yr and roled them for 148 and for a team they had "NO CHANCE" i think that is a grand final winning effort!!!!!!!!
by fanta » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:18 pm
Mr Miraculous wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
how can you say thaqt oz... yes they were the best team all yr but as everyone would say that means NOTHING!!! in a grand final... rose and crown had them on toast![]()
![]()
![]()
start of the season R&C where no chance according to people like you,,, they proved you wrong then when it came to finals they where nochance to beat 1 tree hill,,, then in the big GF they where no chance again but they still done what no team could do all yr and roled them for 148 and for a team they had "NO CHANCE" i think that is a grand final winning effort!!!!!!!!
I believe the final result is a draw.... Due to inner politics, SW didnt deserve a premiership anyway
by Wizard of Oz » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:38 pm
cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
how can you say thaqt oz... yes they were the best team all yr but as everyone would say that means NOTHING!!! in a grand final... rose and crown had them on toast![]()
![]()
![]()
start of the season R&C where no chance according to people like you,,, they proved you wrong then when it came to finals they where nochance to beat 1 tree hill,,, then in the big GF they where no chance again but they still done what no team could do all yr and roled them for 148 and for a team they had "NO CHANCE" i think that is a grand final winning effort!!!!!!!!
by Wizard of Oz » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:38 pm
Mr Miraculous wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
how can you say thaqt oz... yes they were the best team all yr but as everyone would say that means NOTHING!!! in a grand final... rose and crown had them on toast![]()
![]()
![]()
start of the season R&C where no chance according to people like you,,, they proved you wrong then when it came to finals they where nochance to beat 1 tree hill,,, then in the big GF they where no chance again but they still done what no team could do all yr and roled them for 148 and for a team they had "NO CHANCE" i think that is a grand final winning effort!!!!!!!!
I believe the final result is a draw.... Due to inner politics, SW didnt deserve a premiership anyway
by Mr Miraculous » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:51 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:Mr Miraculous wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
how can you say thaqt oz... yes they were the best team all yr but as everyone would say that means NOTHING!!! in a grand final... rose and crown had them on toast![]()
![]()
![]()
start of the season R&C where no chance according to people like you,,, they proved you wrong then when it came to finals they where nochance to beat 1 tree hill,,, then in the big GF they where no chance again but they still done what no team could do all yr and roled them for 148 and for a team they had "NO CHANCE" i think that is a grand final winning effort!!!!!!!!
I believe the final result is a draw.... Due to inner politics, SW didnt deserve a premiership anyway
Because that makes sense
by cricket1012010 » Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:37 pm
by Iwasthere84 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:30 am
cricket1012010 wrote:you made it sound like rose and crown did not deserve to be there...clearly the best side all season?? wot about saturday?? R&C where CLEARLY the best side in the GF
by cokadonkeytoo » Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:23 am
fanta wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Well done Westerners ! Just another Grade 1 flag. Clearly the best side all season and thoroughly deserved.
how can you say thaqt oz... yes they were the best team all yr but as everyone would say that means NOTHING!!! in a grand final... rose and crown had them on toast![]()
![]()
![]()
start of the season R&C where no chance according to people like you,,, they proved you wrong then when it came to finals they where nochance to beat 1 tree hill,,, then in the big GF they where no chance again but they still done what no team could do all yr and roled them for 148 and for a team they had "NO CHANCE" i think that is a grand final winning effort!!!!!!!!
Your right you did well with the ball but 148 isnt that bad in finals but unfortunately in a rain effected game being the best team all yr does mean something.
by cricket1012010 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:52 am
Iwasthere84 wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:you made it sound like rose and crown did not deserve to be there...clearly the best side all season?? wot about saturday?? R&C where CLEARLY the best side in the GF
There would be umpteen sides in the past, who have won premierships defending 150 odd. So how can you say R & C were better on the day.Westies easily the best side all year and got what they deserved
by Wizard of Oz » Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:58 am
cricket1012010 wrote:Iwasthere84 wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:you made it sound like rose and crown did not deserve to be there...clearly the best side all season?? wot about saturday?? R&C where CLEARLY the best side in the GF
There would be umpteen sides in the past, who have won premierships defending 150 odd. So how can you say R & C were better on the day.Westies easily the best side all year and got what they deserved
None of westies batters that made runs all year made anything in the GF they left it up to the bowlers to make runs... yes 148 is defend able but as im sure they were expected to make much more against the rose and crown bowling attack (that no one rated against westies),, seeing they didnt live up to the expectations of everyone... (including themselves) i think that is enough to say there batting line was no match for rose and crowns bowling line up this time around
by Iwasthere84 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:02 am
Wizard of Oz wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:Iwasthere84 wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:you made it sound like rose and crown did not deserve to be there...clearly the best side all season?? wot about saturday?? R&C where CLEARLY the best side in the GF
There would be umpteen sides in the past, who have won premierships defending 150 odd. So how can you say R & C were better on the day.Westies easily the best side all year and got what they deserved
None of westies batters that made runs all year made anything in the GF they left it up to the bowlers to make runs... yes 148 is defend able but as im sure they were expected to make much more against the rose and crown bowling attack (that no one rated against westies),, seeing they didnt live up to the expectations of everyone... (including themselves) i think that is enough to say there batting line was no match for rose and crowns bowling line up this time around
Just throwing it out there but didn't the number 4 top score ?
by cricket1012010 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:19 am
Wizard of Oz wrote:Spot on 84
by duck-mann » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:22 am
by sports follower » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:23 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |