Alaska wrote:Guess which Hills Team president is getting married this weekend?
Also he does not play A and B Grade Footy!
But does moonlight as a c grade footballer !!
by the wonder elephant » Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:19 am
Alaska wrote:Guess which Hills Team president is getting married this weekend?
Also he does not play A and B Grade Footy!
by saintal » Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:58 pm
by Footy Warrior » Sun Mar 20, 2011 9:09 am
by saintal » Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:08 am
Footy Warrior wrote:Alex Georgiou ripped through Woodside after they won the toss and chose to bat first.
Mt.Torrens won the B grade. The 2nd Mt.Torrens team recruited Enfield's best bowler Adam Gully for the 2nd half of the season and it appears to have paid dividends.
by Justquietly » Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:10 pm
by cricketlad » Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:20 pm
by Banker » Mon Mar 21, 2011 2:27 pm
Justquietly wrote:Not much played but we somehow got away with a full A2 game at Belair
by Justquietly » Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:30 pm
by Justquietly » Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:37 am
by Dutchy » Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:34 pm
by Koll Joll Roll » Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:04 pm
by Dutchy » Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:24 pm
by Bat Pad » Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:36 pm
Dutchy wrote:Under 14's are in the Grand Final I believe?
The issue is fringe A graders dropping 3 grades back to D grade is not good for any genuine D grade players, how do you think they feel facing someone who played A grade last week? We are likely to lose genuine D grade players because of this.
Meadows made the Grand Final of C grade only 2 years ago. Now cant commit to fielding one, but dominate D grade?
I just think if you have an A grade team then the 2nd team should be in C grade minimum.
by 2jox » Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:55 pm
Koll Joll Roll wrote:In regard to the Meadows situation, from my reports they were extremely close to only having one team this year that being A Grade. Due to a number of kids and C Grade cricketers from the year previous not committing to play permanently and some not at all. They decided for the benefit of their club and the kids (17-19) who were keen to play and were committed to play with a couple of older players that D Grade was the better options as the club feared if they were continually beaten they would lose their second team. If you are real keen to check out the situation look how many they have qualified for finals 23 players across two teams?? With a couple of those requiring to play the last round just to qualify.
Originally the powers to be at Meadows Dawes, Reids etc wanted a A, B & D Grade but were unable to. So before you go firing shots about it being deliberate. Would you prefer Meadows had one side??
Cricket is a dieing sport and Meadows is one club struggling to keep juniors involved.
by Bat Pad » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:00 pm
2jox wrote:Koll Joll Roll wrote:In regard to the Meadows situation, from my reports they were extremely close to only having one team this year that being A Grade. Due to a number of kids and C Grade cricketers from the year previous not committing to play permanently and some not at all. They decided for the benefit of their club and the kids (17-19) who were keen to play and were committed to play with a couple of older players that D Grade was the better options as the club feared if they were continually beaten they would lose their second team. If you are real keen to check out the situation look how many they have qualified for finals 23 players across two teams?? With a couple of those requiring to play the last round just to qualify.
Originally the powers to be at Meadows Dawes, Reids etc wanted a A, B & D Grade but were unable to. So before you go firing shots about it being deliberate. Would you prefer Meadows had one side??
Cricket is a dieing sport and Meadows is one club struggling to keep juniors involved.
Have many 17 - 19 year olds played in the d grade final on the weekend?
Also BP pretty sure Lofty had a C grade last time there D grade won the flag.
by Dutchy » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:04 pm
by Koll Joll Roll » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:21 pm
by Justquietly » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:30 pm
Koll Joll Roll wrote:In regard to the Meadows situation, from my reports they were extremely close to only having one team this year that being A Grade. Due to a number of kids and C Grade cricketers from the year previous not committing to play permanently and some not at all. They decided for the benefit of their club and the kids (17-19) who were keen to play and were committed to play with a couple of older players that D Grade was the better options as the club feared if they were continually beaten they would lose their second team. If you are real keen to check out the situation look how many they have qualified for finals 23 players across two teams?? With a couple of those requiring to play the last round just to qualify.
Originally the powers to be at Meadows Dawes, Reids etc wanted a A, B & D Grade but were unable to. So before you go firing shots about it being deliberate. Would you prefer Meadows had one side??
Cricket is a dieing sport and Meadows is one club struggling to keep juniors involved.
by Koll Joll Roll » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:50 pm
by Bat Pad » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:51 pm
Dutchy wrote:08/09 Lofty won the C & D grade - so mute point, whenever we have had a D grade its been our 3rd or 4th side...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |