Zartan wrote:Geez you dribble some crap oyster
Should Oyster shuck off?
by Dogwatcher » Tue May 10, 2016 1:57 pm
Zartan wrote:Geez you dribble some crap oyster
by Aerie » Tue May 10, 2016 2:18 pm
The Hound wrote:October can't come around quick enough with the extra spice Oyster has thrown into the games between the ACC, GDCC vs WT and Swampy's clashes (if either club is still around). Can't wait to unfold the deck chair, open the esky and watch the days play:)
by Tony Clifton » Tue May 10, 2016 3:40 pm
by The Hound » Tue May 10, 2016 4:13 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Zartan wrote:Geez you dribble some crap oyster
Should Oyster shuck off?
by Aerie » Wed May 11, 2016 9:19 am
by bulldogproud2 » Wed May 11, 2016 12:46 pm
The Hound wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Zartan wrote:Geez you dribble some crap oyster
Should Oyster shuck off?
Or float back to the bottom of the sea floor
Interesting that both GDCC and ACC provided more junior squad members in the Under 15 & 17 SACA training sqauds than WT & PT A , even Woodville had more than WT in the 15's
by am Bays » Wed May 11, 2016 2:39 pm
Aerie wrote:SACA Underage squads as 10th team as suggested by Tony Clifton.
by The Hound » Wed May 11, 2016 2:42 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:The Hound wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Zartan wrote:Geez you dribble some crap oyster
Should Oyster shuck off?
Or float back to the bottom of the sea floor
Interesting that both GDCC and ACC provided more junior squad members in the Under 15 & 17 SACA training sqauds than WT & PT A , even Woodville had more than WT in the 15's
It may be worthwhile looking at the whole figures though. You neglected to say the following:
West Torrens have the equal highest representation in the State Under 17 Men's squad.
West Torrens have the equal third highest representation in the State Under 14 Boys' squad.
West Torrens have the third highest representation in the Under 18 Female squad.
West Torrens have the third highest representation in the Under 15 Girls' squad.
West Torrens and Port Adelaide each share the highest representation in the SAPSASA Girls' squad (so much for no young people in the area!)
Cheers
by daysofourlives » Wed May 11, 2016 6:51 pm
Aerie wrote:Perhaps it is time to do a complete overhaul of Premier Cricket as they did in 1897?
Use Federal electorates as boundaries/zones, given they are an even distribution of population. This is close to what Zadow Report suggested.
Port/Woodville - Port Adelaide
WT/Glenelg - Hindmarsh
Sturt/Adelaide - Boothby
Prospect/Uni - Adelaide
East Torrens/Kens - Sturt
TTG - Makin
SD - Kingston
Move ND to Gawler - Wakefield/Grey
New Club at Mt Barker - Mayo/Barker
SACA Underage squads as 10th team as suggested by Tony Clifton.
by Aerie » Wed May 11, 2016 7:09 pm
by heater31 » Wed May 11, 2016 7:16 pm
by Aerie » Wed May 11, 2016 8:41 pm
heater31 wrote:Forget Gawler, not in SACA's long term plans to have a team based there. Think the long term plan is to relocate an existing team up the hill to Mt Barker.
by daysofourlives » Wed May 11, 2016 9:31 pm
heater31 wrote:Forget Gawler, not in SACA's long term plans to have a team based there. Think the long term plan is to relocate an existing team up the hill to Mt Barker.
by Tony Clifton » Wed May 11, 2016 9:48 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu May 12, 2016 9:31 am
daysofourlives wrote:heater31 wrote:Forget Gawler, not in SACA's long term plans to have a team based there. Think the long term plan is to relocate an existing team up the hill to Mt Barker.
Pretty sure it is in their plans, it was in the report, i have heard a board member talk about it.
It would be the Jets getting relocated id imagine rather than a new team
by Corona Man » Thu May 12, 2016 9:39 am
by heater31 » Thu May 12, 2016 10:03 am
daysofourlives wrote:heater31 wrote:Forget Gawler, not in SACA's long term plans to have a team based there. Think the long term plan is to relocate an existing team up the hill to Mt Barker.
Pretty sure it is in their plans, it was in the report, i have heard a board member talk about it.
It would be the Jets getting relocated id imagine rather than a new team
by Aerie » Thu May 12, 2016 10:58 am
heater31 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:heater31 wrote:Forget Gawler, not in SACA's long term plans to have a team based there. Think the long term plan is to relocate an existing team up the hill to Mt Barker.
Pretty sure it is in their plans, it was in the report, i have heard a board member talk about it.
It would be the Jets getting relocated id imagine rather than a new team
Can people stop taking the Independent Zadow report as gospel? Yes some parts of it have been implemented such as the balls and some elements of the ground preparations. However, anything to do with Mergers/Structure of the competition has been overridden by a report commissioned by the board completed by the CEO.
by the javelin » Thu May 12, 2016 11:59 am
by ferret » Thu May 12, 2016 12:06 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |