SA Footy

Ecky wrote:Adelaide Lutheran and Enfield can finish anywhere from 1st to 6th
Rose Park, NEK, Fitzroy and Seaton can finish anywhere from 1st to 7th
Para Vista can finish anywhere from 3rd to 7th

These are all realistic situations too and don't rely on teams scoring 500 or whatever to make up huge amounts of bonus points.

There will be a heap of bonus points where I play after I smash the bowlers to all parts

"Live Ladder" after week 1 of Round 10:

Adel Lutheran 73.71 (-)
Enfield 71.20 (-)
Rose Park 69.19 (+3)
Fitzroy 67.96 (-)
NEK 67.54 (-2)
Seaton 65.42 (-1)
Para Vista 62.17 (-)
Morialta 30.12 (-)

Over night Scores:
Rose Park 110 v Para Vista 73 (Lead by 37 runs start of 2nd innings)
NEK 190 v Adel Lutheran
Magill 142 v Fitzroy 2/75 (Trail by 67)
Enfield 179 v Seaton

Phantom Gossiper wrote:

carey wrote:

Ecky wrote:PV can still make the finals.

Ok so this may be true BUT if PV don't make is this true about it being there 1st time ever?

I believe this is correct

Fair effort

When was the last time Para Vista lost outright?

All I know is Adelaide Lutheran have never beaten Para Vista As outright, but have once in B-Grade, in round 4, 1997/98.

Ecky wrote:All I know is Adelaide Lutheran have never beaten Para Vista As outright, but have once in B-Grade, in round 4, 1997/98.

I've tried looking over previous seasons and Annual Reports.. I cant find a season yet that PV 'A' have lost outright.. but Enfield did also beat their 'B' grade in Round 2 2007-08.

From memory that was the season they fielded 3 sides.. Marc Cossens was opening the bowling when we played them..

Cougar wrote:

Phantom Gossiper wrote:

carey wrote:

Ecky wrote:PV can still make the finals.

Ok so this may be true BUT if PV don't make is this true about it being there 1st time ever?

I believe this is correct

Fair effort

Even greater effort considering this time span would have gone as far back as Mark Weinert's playing days in the 60's and 70's

Cougar wrote:Even greater effort considering this time span would have gone as far back as Mark Weinert's playing days in the 60's and 70's

I believe Mid 70's was when PV was first formed.. could be wrong, but i believe they began in div 2 where they stayed for a couple of seasons before moving up to div 1 where they have remained since.. best part of 40 years!

All hail the Messiah, Coach Gossiper

The greatest revival in churches history.

Bit of smashing on the Churches FB page Saturday night. Love smashing

what occured Milly?

Is it true that one of the captains of a club in this comp time wasted late in the day, happy to finish the day with a win and expecting other results to go his way to make finals?

I heard as a result his team won the game and went from 4th to 5th, misssed the finals by a few runs, then blamed another club for them missing? Is this true?

beeroclock wrote:

moses wrote:This weeks Poll Question: After appearing to lose its mojo will Rose Park make the finals after it’s zero and two start?

Pretty hard not too.
Win four games and your in.Bahahahahaha.

*cough, cough* ... Wrong...

Lucky For Some wrote:Is it true that one of the captains of a club in this comp time wasted late in the day, happy to finish the day with a win and expecting other results to go his way to make finals?

I heard as a result his team won the game and went from 4th to 5th, misssed the finals by a few runs, then blamed another club for them missing? Is this true?

Stop talking in riddles and name clubs!

I'm confused, im guessing you are talking about NEK but im not sure what happened out there.

All i know is Rose Park won outright to grab a spot in the finals.

sounds a bit innapropriate to blame someone else everyone knew how tight the ladder was.

The_Informer wrote:

Lucky For Some wrote:Is it true that one of the captains of a club in this comp time wasted late in the day, happy to finish the day with a win and expecting other results to go his way to make finals?

I heard as a result his team won the game and went from 4th to 5th, misssed the finals by a few runs, then blamed another club for them missing? Is this true?

Stop talking in riddles and name clubs!

I'm confused, im guessing you are talking about NEK but im not sure what happened out there.

All i know is Rose Park won outright to grab a spot in the finals.

I dont know the clubs in this comp really, just know it was the side that was sitting 3rd and they missed finals despite winning which i guess must be NEK.

Then i see the comments flying around on Facebook on Saturday night!

Lucky For Some wrote:

The_Informer wrote:

Lucky For Some wrote:Is it true that one of the captains of a club in this comp time wasted late in the day, happy to finish the day with a win and expecting other results to go his way to make finals?

I heard as a result his team won the game and went from 4th to 5th, misssed the finals by a few runs, then blamed another club for them missing? Is this true?

Stop talking in riddles and name clubs!

I'm confused, im guessing you are talking about NEK but im not sure what happened out there.

All i know is Rose Park won outright to grab a spot in the finals.

I dont know the clubs in this comp really, just know it was the side that was sitting 3rd and they missed finals despite winning which i guess must be NEK.

Then i see the comments flying around on Facebook on Saturday night!

Yes i did hear there were a few comments flying around Sat night, missed all of that.

Must feel for NEK, last year they missed the grand final by one run and this season they are 3rd going into the last round and beat the top team and miss out!

Lucky For Some wrote:Is it true that one of the captains of a club in this comp time wasted late in the day, happy to finish the day with a win and expecting other results to go his way to make finals?

I heard as a result his team won the game and went from 4th to 5th, misssed the finals by a few runs, then blamed another club for them missing? Is this true?

is this true?? who is the captain at NEK, its Baldo isnt it????, think he should definitely retire now after this decision...for good

Under_Scrutiny wrote:

Lucky For Some wrote:Is it true that one of the captains of a club in this comp time wasted late in the day, happy to finish the day with a win and expecting other results to go his way to make finals?

I heard as a result his team won the game and went from 4th to 5th, misssed the finals by a few runs, then blamed another club for them missing? Is this true?

is this true?? who is the captain at NEK, its Baldo isnt it????, think he should definitely retire now after this decision...for good

If there was a calculator at my game I would have smashed it out of the park

If it's true, i dont understand how a captain could get it so wrong.

Looking over the week 1 scores, it looked a formality that Enfield & Fitzroy would win and Rose Park likely outright,.. this means NEK would've had to target Adel Lutheran who they were 6.17 behind.. so as a captain, sure you realise you need to win the game + make up that 0.17 (17 runs) difference!

1 wicket = 20 runs **** it's not rocket science!

10 wickets = restrict to < 173
9 wickets = restrict to < 153
8 wickets = restrict to < 133
7 wickets = restrict to < 113

Adel Lutheran finished 7/126, so to be fair to NEK, their best possible chance would've been to get them 9 down or bowl them out, which time wouldn't have allowed.