Re: Stanley Cricket Association
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 4:38 pm
Week off usually
daysofourlives wrote:whufc wrote:daysofourlives wrote:whufc wrote:This upcoming round will be the last one. Watervale voted against the extra round being used as the law written in was that it would be used for 'heated out' games, not washed out games.
I see if you win you should finish 2nd, lose you miss the 4. Whats the finals set up? 1v2 and 3v4 with a prelim final?
Yeah your correct.
It's the SANFL system with only 4. 1v 2 get a double chance, whilst 3 v 4 play an elimination. Winner of 1 v 2 straight into the GF, the loser plays the winner of 3 v 4. Highest ranked team gets home finals.
I've never seen this system used in cricket before but tbh it works pretty well and gives serious meaning to all minor round games as each spot in the fourth has added value.
Is the Prelim on the sunday or does the winner of 1v2 have to have a week off? That would be the downside to it, especially with no one playing the week before finals, that's just ludicrous, crickets a game you want to keep playing
whufc wrote:This upcoming round will be the last one. Watervale voted against the extra round being used as the law written in was that it would be used for 'heated out' games, not washed out games.
daysofourlives wrote:Who ever gets in to the GF the hard way this year will win it imo.
Having a week off, then win a semi, week off, then play a GF is to disruptive to maintaining any sort of form
whufc wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Who ever gets in to the GF the hard way this year will win it imo.
Having a week off, then win a semi, week off, then play a GF is to disruptive to maintaining any sort of form
Yeah but i still think its fairer than a 1 v 4 elimination semi and the top side is chasing runs in a one off final where one bad over and their whole season is done.
daysofourlives wrote:whufc wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Who ever gets in to the GF the hard way this year will win it imo.
Having a week off, then win a semi, week off, then play a GF is to disruptive to maintaining any sort of form
Yeah but i still think its fairer than a 1 v 4 elimination semi and the top side is chasing runs in a one off final where one bad over and their whole season is done.
Definitely is fairer, agreed there.
They should play the prelim final on the Sunday after the semi on the saturday
BPlumber wrote:Thoughts on how the finals are shaping up? Anybody unlucky to miss out?
Tips?
Smokey?
whufc wrote:BPlumber wrote:Thoughts on how the finals are shaping up? Anybody unlucky to miss out?
Tips?
Smokey?
Sevenhill the smokey to win it from third!
daysofourlives wrote:whufc wrote:BPlumber wrote:Thoughts on how the finals are shaping up? Anybody unlucky to miss out?
Tips?
Smokey?
Sevenhill the smokey to win it from third!
good strategic placing, at least youll play three weeks in a row
BPlumber wrote:Thoughts on how the finals are shaping up? Anybody unlucky to miss out?
Tips?
Smokey?
OnSong wrote:BPlumber wrote:Thoughts on how the finals are shaping up? Anybody unlucky to miss out?
Tips?
Smokey?
Lower North should win in a canter.
I'd love to see the Bulldogs pull off a drought-breaker for so many long suffering blokes who fronted up week in, week out for the best part of a decade without any success. Got some good kids in the side but I've seen them collapse from match-winning positions to lose far too often. Game against Sevenhill a few weeks back was a classic example.
whufc wrote:Blyth have made the finals for the first time since the 1960's apparently.
Tony Clifton wrote:whufc wrote:Blyth have made the finals for the first time since the 1960's apparently.
That's quite a drought!
Good stuff
happyhawk wrote:Rumours are rife that Auburn/Mintaro have been approached by Gilbert Valley informally about joining them in the BLCA, and Lower North strongly considering a move south too.