ATCA 2013/14.

[bloods08]

Any results

[Phantom Gossiper]

Any results

Ingle Farm B & D grade won

[Trader]

A1 - Grange Def Goodwood
A2 - SPOC Def Para Hills
A3 - Port Districts Def Flinders Uni
A4 - Goodwood Def Fulham

B1 - Grange Def Payneham
B2 - Ingle Farm Def Hectorville
B3 - Marion Def Old Scotch

C1 - Fulham Def Payneham
C2 - ??
C3 - Ingle Farm Def Modbury

LOA - Gaza def Grange
LOB - Mercedes def Brighton
LOC - Unley def Flinders Park
LOD - PAOC def Old Iggies
LOE - Adelaide Rockets def Golden Grove
LOF - Para Hills def Panorama

[heater31]

SPOC A2

[bloods08]

Adelaide Rockets d Golden Grove LOE.

[Sonofbrowny25]

Trinity won C2... Thats the clubs 6th premiership in a 5 or 6 years now

[Dogwatcher]

A good effort by the lads.
Bowled Unley out for 90 and were 7/96 overnight.
Dismissed for 100. Unley then set Trinity about 140 to win from 32 overs, but obviously all they had to do was bat for time, which they did.

[EldersUniSA]

A good effort by the lads.
Bowled Unley out for 90 and were 7/96 overnight.
Dismissed for 100. Unley then set Trinity about 140 to win from 32 overs, but obviously all they had to do was bat for time, which they did.

Congratulations, another close low scoring game.

[Down the Hill]

Should outright results be played for in finals. During the minor round a team that wins outright (after losing on 1st innings) is declared the winner under the general Laws of Cricket. But the ATCA points system means that the true winner of the match is still the team that won on 1st innings because they ultimately receive more overall points from the match than the team that wins outright.

I'm not suggesting that the outright winner should receive anymore than 5 points in the minor round because the ultimate goal is to achieve a 1st innings win and I'm quite alright with minor round matches continuing after a 1st innings result is achieved for the sake of bonus points and blokes getting a decent bat or bowl. However, I'm not sure if a final should be allowed to continue beyond a 1st innings result regardless of how early the game is over because it can often turn into a circus.

[EldersUniSA]

Should outright results be played for in finals. During the minor round a team that wins outright (after losing on 1st innings) is declared the winner under the general Laws of Cricket. But the ATCA points system means that the true winner of the match is still the team that won on 1st innings because they ultimately receive more overall points from the match than the team that wins outright.

I'm not suggesting that the outright winner should receive anymore than 5 points in the minor round because the ultimate goal is to achieve a 1st innings win and I'm quite alright with minor round matches continuing after a 1st innings result is achieved for the sake of bonus points and blokes getting a decent bat or bowl. However, I'm not sure if a final should be allowed to continue beyond a 1st innings result regardless of how early the game is over because it can often turn into a circus.

Interesting.

It's odd that outright points are less than first innings. I suppose it is a way to stop teams doing sporting declarations to play for more points. But I think Outright should result in greater points than first innings as a rule.

Definitely believe it should be considered still in finals. Does open up other parts of the game like playing for time. But you see teams do that in test cricket as well.

I have seen in other comps they make the Grand final a 3 day game which opens up more to think about.

[tigerpie]

Outright wins in finals is imperitive.

Its 80 overs each so if you take 20 wickets for 1 more run than the opposition, well done to you.

If you get a dodgy wicket on day 1 because of weather or whatever. and get skittled cheaply in bugger all overs, then you skittle the oppostion similarly, and theres heaps of overs to go, do you just walk off?

Naaaaah! Game on.

[heater31]

Captains must agree to call it off after a first innings result. Get rolled for stuff all and them bowl them out for a miniscule lead, off course you play the game out the opposition might collapse under the pressure....

[beeroclock]

What's the history of Knight from Grange.
Had a fair season.

[heater31]

What's the history of Knight from Grange.
Had a fair season.

Ex West Torrens, possibly under age state player. Played a few seasons in the Country for Karoonda now back in the city. Wouldn't be 30 years old yet either.

[Footy Smart]

What's the history of Knight from Grange.
Had a fair season.

Ex West Torrens, possibly under age state player. Played a few seasons in the Country for Karoonda now back in the city. Wouldn't be 30 years old yet either.

Yep, played in the underage state squads, would be about 27 years old.

[heater31]

What's the history of Knight from Grange.
Had a fair season.

Ex West Torrens, possibly under age state player. Played a few seasons in the Country for Karoonda now back in the city. Wouldn't be 30 years old yet either.

Yep, played in the underage state squads, would be about 27 years old.

I played under 17's against him. Tore us a new one at Henley Oval that year I'm sure. The day before Shane Scudds did the same

[beeroclock]

What's the history of Knight from Grange.
Had a fair season.

Ex West Torrens, possibly under age state player. Played a few seasons in the Country for Karoonda now back in the city. Wouldn't be 30 years old yet either.

Yep, played in the underage state squads, would be about 27 years old.

I played under 17's against him. Tore us a new one at Henley Oval that year I'm sure. The day before Shane Scudds did the same

Thanks.
Scuds was just a slogger.
Played against him a few times.

[Phantom Gossiper]

Thanks.
Scuds was just a slogger.
Played against him a few times.

Can hit them though.. and hit them big!

[Footy Smart]

I played under 17's against him. Tore us a new one at Henley Oval that year I'm sure. The day before Shane Scudds did the same

We beat them in the GF - Back to Back SS premiers

Thanks.
Scuds was just a slogger.
Played against him a few times

While you coul classifiy him as a slogger, he would score most his runs over long orff and long on..... very rarely went across the line!

[tigerpie]

I played under 17's against him. Tore us a new one at Henley Oval that year I'm sure. The day before Shane Scudds did the same

We beat them in the GF - Back to Back SS premiers

Thanks.
Scuds was just a slogger.
Played against him a few times

While you coul classifiy him as a slogger, he would score most his runs over long orff and long on..... very rarely went across the line!

Definetly a slogger, but the dangerous hit straight type of slogger. Smashed in one innings one day. But next time had him caught cheap in the gully.
It was hiking!!!!