Lib Senator guilty and not guilty

[redandblack]

I have not said it is his fault he got assaulted
I said that on that occasion, it was proven as unprovoked - doesn't mean every other time someone's had a crack at him, he hasn't contributed to the problem or, God forbid, just walked away
Nice try R&B but dont twist my words to suit your own argument

My error - he's not provocative at all - he's just one of the thousand politicians that gets punched every month for no reason.

Jimmy, he's been assaulted twice.

Not quite every month'.

You agree that once it was unprovoked. What detail do you have to blame him for the other one?

If you don't like him, fine, many don't, but it's a nonsense argument to blame his attitude for being punched in a public place.

[Bat Pad]

3 times isn't it?

Wasn't there another incident on Gouger St?

[redandblack]

BP, I think that was the one where the attacker was found guilty?

[Bat Pad]

BP, I think that was the one where the attacker was found guilty?

I thought that was the Marble Bar incident?

[Jimmy_041]

Correct Bat Pad

Actually R&B - I really couldn't give a stuff
The bloke can do whatever he wants and, no doubt, will.
If he doesn't think he needs to change his attitude, then so be it.

I'd be quite happy never to hear about him again.

[redandblack]

I don't know.

He gets into so many incidents it's hard to keep track

[Jimmy_041]