Leaping Lindner wrote:I'd listen to Gough Whitlam singing anyday of the week over Tim "Middle-Aged angst" Freeman.
A peer of yours, no doubt!

by Punk Rooster » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:16 am
Leaping Lindner wrote:I'd listen to Gough Whitlam singing anyday of the week over Tim "Middle-Aged angst" Freeman.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by our_longreach » Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:13 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:17 am
Coorong wrote:And I will defend your right to voice such an opinion.
by mrjbeam1981 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:08 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:25 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:41 pm
by mrjbeam1981 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:21 pm
Coorong wrote:How was it wrong. we took kids out of relative poverty and gave them a chance. The disapointing thing is many went back.
Have any of you (and I know their are a couple of Aboriginal forum members) ever lived in their community. I did for the first 20 odd years of my life. Educated with them, lived with them, spoke thier language, drank with them, partied with them, worked with them, loved a few, fought a few too.
The true aboriginals like my mates dont call it the stolen generation, and a few of those "were stolen" too, but were thankful and have lived happy and positive lives.
This whole stolen generation thing has been developed by blue eyed lawyers who see it as a goldmine. Similar with the land right thing.
This argument is way off track. Pauline is accused of asking questions on the imigration policy. I ask similar questions. Travel to Melbourne and visit any suburb. Vietnamese who came here 2-5 years ago as refugees, now live in the best suburbs and drive merc'. Similar to many other nationalities.
Walk into any chemist shop, milk bar, service station, bakery, doctors surgery, newsagents, bottle shop etc in Melbourne or Sydney and you will wonder what country you are in.
some of you Adelaide people sometimes live in a sheltered part of the world, 30 minutes and twenty years from reality.... me thinks
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Having grown up on Aboriginal land in the back blocks of the NT and spoken to many Australians (salt water mob and desert mob) who were removed from their parents and the children and grand children thta were removed. It is fair to say that most of of them are appreciative of the economic and education opportunities they were able to experience that made their lives in an economic sense much easier. The common comment is, "Hey that was what happened back then no point looking back or holding grudges, I wouldn't have had the career I've had or been able to provide for my kids if I didn't get that education"
However look into their eyes and there is a particular look that says they experienced many emotional hardships that they can't or don't want to explain (at least not to me any anyway). Plenty of documented evidence in the press recently of what has happened to wards of the state and British orphan's so to say some of that didn't happen to some individuals of indigenous decent would be head in the sand stuff.
So while they have gained on one hand they lost on the other and as a parent nothing could compensate for having a child taken away from you
So to be fair for every person who benefitted from the policy that existed 50 years ago it is fair to say that for everyone who beneffiteed there are those who are f***ed up.
Certainly a lot of my best mate's anger about the system can be traced to what happened to his Mum and Aunties...Mind you he know's how to make they system work for himself too......
PhilG wrote:Holy madhouse, Batman!! What did I start here??![]()
First off - the quote I mentioned at the top was from Sunrise. If anyone has a link to the transcript I'm sure it will show that she was in no way taken out of context.
I read what I could stomach of Coorong's racism and lack of understanding, and applaud Wedgie's comments in response. It's all very well to talk about "not getting a vote" and so forth. May I remind you, Coorong, that it was WORSE than that! Under the constitution - until 1967 - the Aborogines were not recognised as part of the population. And as a result were not just prevented from voting. They were deprived of funding that otherwise would have gone their was for essentials that white Australia took for granted. And not only that (and I have been given one example of this) when Aborigines were the victims of a crime, it got nowhere! Because they weren't part of the population, the laws of the land that would have otherwise protected them did not. If it hadn't been for the efforts of good samaritans like Daisy Bates it would have been even worse!
Also, the Aborigines were the victims - to a degree - of the White Australia policy. Now when it was first brought out that policy was aimed at preventing Asians from coming in to the country, but it didn't stop a similar attitude being applied to the Aborigines in government decision making.
This is what Coorong doesn't get. For 179 years (1788 to 1967) there was legal psychological MURDER going on. Generation after generation was being driven into the ground, and that is bound to get into the psych of families over those generations. And despite the constitution being changed almost 40 years ago - it's going to take a lot longer than that to repair the damage that has been done. We PUSHED the Aborigines into the dirt - and now Coorong expects them to pick themselves up? Hey, sunshine - they don't know how because we drummed it into them for 179 years that they weren't worth it! It has to take it's toll AND you can't just sweep it aside just like that. Recognise the damage, and do something about that first. And I don't mean chucking money at it either.
A treaty would be a good start - as well as the government having the guts to say "I'm sorry", on behalf of the ignorant governments that Australians voted for from 1901 to 1967 - particularly those at the time of the Stolen Generation and the White Australia Policy.
by am Bays » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:34 pm
by Coorong » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:53 pm
by Sheik Yerbouti » Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:25 pm
by redandblack » Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:29 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:35 pm
by Coorong » Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:07 pm
by Snaggletooth Tiger » Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:33 pm
Coorong wrote:I think political correctness does go a little to far.
by PhilG » Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:25 pm
by mrjbeam1981 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:27 pm
by PhilG » Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |