SA Footy

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Gozu wrote:

Psyber wrote:A federal MP I knew in Melbourne told me nothing gets an issue to review at the cabinet table like lots of MPs getting lots of letters in the subject and being made nervous by them. No one letter counts for much, but it works if enough people join in. The same guy said petitions tend to get discounted on the grounds that people sign them without really caring whereas individual letters show they do care about the issue as it takes them more time to write their own letter.

A bit more on Bernardi's astroturfing:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/berna ... 1lqj7.html

FFS, that was October 2011. You just catching up on some old papers by the throne?

Don't get upset Jimmy, Psyber didn't appear aware of some of Bernardi's well known astroturfing tactics.

Grahaml wrote:

dedja wrote:Why doesn't Cory Bernardi have the guts to run for a house of reps seat instead of being a parasite and hiding behind a senate donkey vote to get elected?

Maybe he's too scared his 'silent majority' theories would get found out.

Don't think we should have any good senators? I take it you feel the same about Senators from both sides. I guess Wong's been hiding behind a donkey vote too.

In a sense she has, how do you think a gay Asian woman would go winning a seat despite how talented she is?

We just saw the disgraceful treatment a female copped as PM too, the highest office in the land.

I'm not sure what disgraceful treatment she copped.
I, certainly, saw some disgraceful behaviour on her part

Youtube, they suspended abbotts account apparently and rightly so!!!!!!

Jimmy_041 wrote:I'm not sure what disgraceful treatment she copped.
I, certainly, saw some disgraceful behaviour on her part

Don't be an idiot Jimmy.

Fruit bowl/deliberately barren? Being asked by shockjocks if her husband was really gay? She should be put in a chaff bag and thrown overboard? She should be kicked to death?

Imagine the uproar if when as PM John Howard was asked by a radio host if Jeanette was a closet dyke, implying their marriage is a sham?

I'm not saying she was a great PM and I criticised her decisions plenty of times on here but the rank sexist treatment she copped as PM was to this country's great shame.

Serious question. How do the LNP voters on this forum feel about the Great Barrier Reef being damaged or old growth forests in Tasmania no longer protected. Forget ideology or whatever is THIS what you were voting for, and what you thought would happen?

LL they have no social conscience!

Gozu wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Gozu wrote:

Psyber wrote:A federal MP I knew in Melbourne told me nothing gets an issue to review at the cabinet table like lots of MPs getting lots of letters in the subject and being made nervous by them. No one letter counts for much, but it works if enough people join in. The same guy said petitions tend to get discounted on the grounds that people sign them without really caring whereas individual letters show they do care about the issue as it takes them more time to write their own letter.

A bit more on Bernardi's astroturfing:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/berna ... 1lqj7.html

FFS, that was October 2011. You just catching up on some old papers by the throne?

Don't get upset Jimmy, Psyber didn't appear aware of some of Bernardi's well known astroturfing tactics.

I wasn't aware of his doing anything like that, and don't approve of it.
However, he had nothing to do with my post, which was quoting the former (and now restored) member for La Trobe, Jason Wood.
I knew Jason fairly well back then - he is also more Conservative than me.

Leaping Lindner wrote:Serious question. How do the LNP voters on this forum feel about the Great Barrier Reef being damaged or old growth forests in Tasmania no longer protected. Forget ideology or whatever is THIS what you were voting for, and what you thought would happen?

I'm prepared to answer.

I am not happy about any risk to the reef, but I don't know how real the risk is or whether it is purely speculative, as I don't know the geography and current flow in sufficient detail to form my own opinion. I'd like to have seen a study to look at this done and published before any such activity occurred.

I'd like to see any forest preserved, but old trees do eventually die, and some extraction of trees on their last legs and their replacement to maintain the cycle may be feasible. Again I'd like to see a feasibility study before anything was permitted.

However, in the last election I was more concerned about the economic debt trend than other policies.
I may be socially liberal in some ways, but I am am economic conservative, and don't believe in borrowing more than you can guarantee you'll be able to pay for if conditions change.

Gozu wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:I'm not sure what disgraceful treatment she copped.
I, certainly, saw some disgraceful behaviour on her part

Don't be an idiot Jimmy.

Fruit bowl/deliberately barren? Being asked by shockjocks if her husband was really gay? She should be put in a chaff bag and thrown overboard? She should be kicked to death?

Imagine the uproar if when as PM John Howard was asked by a radio host if Jeanette was a closet dyke, implying their marriage is a sham?

I'm not saying she was a great PM and I criticised her decisions plenty of times on here but the rank sexist treatment she copped as PM was to this country's great shame.

Fruit bowl/deliberately barren? Both said before she was PM
The shockjock got sacked
I dont know about the rest
Gee, Keating gave out worse than that - Oh OK, it was OK because he aimed it at men
http://www.spectator.co.uk/australia/australia-features/8866781/the-abuse-of-power-2/
You want to be in politics - HTFU
She was hard
She didn't mind giving it back either

Leaping Lindner wrote:Serious question. How do the LNP voters on this forum feel about the Great Barrier Reef being damaged or old growth forests in Tasmania no longer protected. Forget ideology or whatever is THIS what you were voting for, and what you thought would happen?

I know of a liberal voter who is daily sharing great barrier reef and wa shark cull things on Facebook. Kind of want to tell him he may be voting for the wrong party.

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

Leaping Lindner wrote:Serious question. How do the LNP voters on this forum feel about the Great Barrier Reef being damaged or old growth forests in Tasmania no longer protected. Forget ideology or whatever is THIS what you were voting for, and what you thought would happen?

I know of a liberal voter who is daily sharing great barrier reef and wa shark cull things on Facebook. Kind of want to tell him he may be voting for the wrong party.

Unfortunately, there are other considerations in deciding whom to vote for - each party has good and bad components to its policies and practices and you have to go for what you think is the best balance until the perfect party magically comes along...

Very true. Just so close after voting and the reason why I can't settle on one political party.

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Very true. Just so close after voting and the reason why I can't settle on one political party.

Yeah...
I chopped and changed a fair bit in the past and am still divided to some extent.
For me it is conservative economic policy that has tipped the balance towards the Libs in the last 15 years, though I was tempted to vote ALP just before they made Mark Latham their leader a few years ago - that swung me back.

I wasn't entirely happy with John Howard, and I must admit Tony does seem to be pushing my tolerance limits for social (as distinct from economic) conservatism a bit...

If they put Turnbull in and went with FTTH NBN sign me up for the libs

Fair points. My issue is the economy goes up and down, but once the Barrier Reef is destroyed it's gone. No growing another one there. But at least the CEO and board of The North Queensland Bulk Ports Corporation will have a few extra zeros at the end of their bank balances to brag about.

Leaping Lindner wrote:Fair points. My issue is the economy goes up and down, but once the Barrier Reef is destroyed it's gone. No growing another one there. But at least the CEO and board of The North Queensland Bulk Ports Corporation will have a few extra zeros at the end of their bank balances to brag about.

yep, 100% agree with this.

so maybe if the greens stopped being an economic basket case and shifted their economic policies closer to the centre, whilst retaining their strong record of conservatism i could even vote for them.

i would definitely describe myself as very strongly left on social issues, and centre or centre right on economic policies, so i guess that means in general the labor party are right for me. and even though i was pretty dissatisfied with labor in the past few years, it was more a sense of "who do i hate the least"

so im only in my late 20s right now, so i havent had two many elections, and only really in my late 20s has my interest in politics increased somewhat,

my question to you is, did people feel the same way about the previous prime ministers?

hawke, keating, and howard, with the benefit of time and hindsight, are all considered pretty decent leaders, whereas rudd/gillard/abbott have either been pretty either very uninspiring or downright horrible, depends on which side of the fence you are on.

is it rose coloured glasses, or are our leaders really that bad at the moment? plenty of old farts out there on SA footy, now is their time to chime in

These days it's like pollies have all been cut from the same mold.

Here comes WORK CHOICES!!!

and that would be the end of these turkeys....bring it!