by Psyber » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:12 pm
Well that is something for the forgotten non-urban Australians which is better than nothing.A further $700 million will be spent providing satellite broadband services to the final 3% of communities, and there will be limited regulatory changes to enforce competition and access to the back-haul fibre.
by Psyber » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:21 pm
The last point is interesting - less than half even wanted the money on offer enough to buy the rest of the package!Conducted by research company Cegedim Strategic Data,
the fax poll found Labor’s GP super clinic policy and plans to introduce block funding for patients with diabetes under a voluntary registration scheme, had little backing among grassroots GPs.
Almost 90% of the 176 GPs surveyed were opposed to super clinics, while only 3% showed support.
More than 80% opposed the diabetes capitation plan, with 11% saying they welcomed it.
And only 15% wanted to see the creation of a national Medicare Locals network.
Almost half (44%), however, supported the move to offer practices up to $500,000 in infrastructure grants.
Mr Abbott said Labor was delivering the prospect of part-time ministers.
Environment Minister Peter Garrett had been one for months, he said.
by AFLflyer » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:22 pm
by wycbloods » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:01 pm
AFLflyer wrote:Paid Parental Leave
I see Liberal is way in front on this policy, which will probably swing my vote.
As i understand it, Liberal will offer 26 weeks compared to 18 weeks. (after child is born or adopted)
On top of that they are offering to pay a % of the carers wage (not clear how they work it out) but it could range between 15 - 75 thousand per year - (salary)
Labour are only offering minimum wage $565 or something a week...
by Gozu » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:28 pm
Psyber wrote:Mr Abbott said
by smac » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:30 pm
wycbloods wrote:AFLflyer wrote:Paid Parental Leave
I see Liberal is way in front on this policy, which will probably swing my vote.
As i understand it, Liberal will offer 26 weeks compared to 18 weeks. (after child is born or adopted)
On top of that they are offering to pay a % of the carers wage (not clear how they work it out) but it could range between 15 - 75 thousand per year - (salary)
Labour are only offering minimum wage $565 or something a week...
The liberals are also not paying for those families where the mother decides to stay at home.
Also it would be of no great surprise to me that Abbott would backflip on this as it is funded by a big business levy(which has already been reduced from 1.7% to 1.5%) because the business community doesn't want it and it just a great new tax.
Labor's policy is a good one IMO because why does someone have to be paid 75k to have six months off with their child. If they are earning that much then frankly they shouldn't need the Scheme as much if not at all. 18 weeks at the minimum wage might just put a few things into perspective for people as well.
by Gozu » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:41 pm
smac wrote:Aside from that, people in different circumstances are treated differently with respect to all social benefits.
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:19 pm
Gozu wrote:Psyber wrote:Mr Abbott said
That's a problem Psyber taking seriously anything that comes out of his mouth. Rudd's job with the UN is part-time, unpaid and would only require three overseas trips next year. Does Abbott's inability to manage his personal finances preclude him from being able to do his job in parliament?
by AFLflyer » Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:24 pm
wycbloods wrote:AFLflyer wrote:Paid Parental Leave
I see Liberal is way in front on this policy, which will probably swing my vote.
As i understand it, Liberal will offer 26 weeks compared to 18 weeks. (after child is born or adopted)
On top of that they are offering to pay a % of the carers wage (not clear how they work it out) but it could range between 15 - 75 thousand per year - (salary)
Labour are only offering minimum wage $565 or something a week...
The liberals are also not paying for those families where the mother decides to stay at home.
Also it would be of no great surprise to me that Abbott would backflip on this as it is funded by a big business levy(which has already been reduced from 1.7% to 1.5%) because the business community doesn't want it and it just a great new tax.
Labor's policy is a good one IMO because why does someone have to be paid 75k to have six months off with their child. If they are earning that much then frankly they shouldn't need the Scheme as much if not at all. 18 weeks at the minimum wage might just put a few things into perspective for people as well.
by Gozu » Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:34 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:38 pm
Gozu wrote:Meet the Coalition's candidate for the seat of Dawson in QLD:
http://www.vexnews.com/news/10459/georg ... es-either/
by Psyber » Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:27 pm
by bulldogproud2 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:14 pm
by AFLflyer » Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:15 pm
by redandblack » Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:24 pm
by southee » Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:54 pm
AFLflyer wrote:anyone watching Gillard on 7pm..?
she handles herself quite well i think.. just match abbots parental leave scheme already!
by redandblack » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:51 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:23 pm
southee wrote:AFLflyer wrote:anyone watching Gillard on 7pm..?
she handles herself quite well i think.. just match abbots parental leave scheme already!
Yes...a ROVE production and as we know ROVE loves the Labour party. ie. Rudd in 2007.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |