redandblack wrote:Sojourner, you're a thoughtful poster on a number of topics and more strength to you, but politics obviously isn't one of your strong points based on that post.
No political party ever 'lets' the other mob govern. Full stop.
aB, because of the senate position, it's always likely that there will be a DD, but I'm not convinced that will be a certainty. I'll have a think about it and respond to your good question.
My thoughts are that with the two larger parties having to negotiate with the minor parties to get their legislation through in both houses in partiular the Senate the chances of blocked legislation is obviously much higher this when both the Liberals and ALP wll ahve to potentially risk alienating their traditional supporter bases to get legislation through.
The advantage of a DD is that it traditionally favours the larger parties as the quota required is usually 8% compared to 16% of the vote. So the last two quotas can easily go to the larger party rather than one of the smaller ones as they have a greater %age of the overall Senate vote.
However with the Green Sitting on 12 % vote in the Senate not sure if the major parties would be prepare to risk giving the Greens 12 senators.
The DD options is preferable when the third parties vote is below 10 %
I think I've got that right...
