Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Psyber » Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:31 pm

Quichey wrote:Emigration is one of the oldest and most constant human experiences. Imaginary lines on maps and socially irresponsible hard line stances will not stop it.
It has been, probably, one of the most common causes of local battles and other similar hard line activities too..
Territoriality is hard-wired into animals of most if not all species.
You are right, lines on maps are artificial, and only change has been constant as this process continues.

The issue of whether new comers will bring good or harm with them has always been with us, and there is, and has been, no certain answer.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Leaping Lindner » Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:40 pm

ORDoubleBlues wrote:
redden whites wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:It's all very well to agree with our way of doing things but it's not the real refugees that are getting into Australia, it's the ones that can afford to pay a five figure sum to circumvent the process.

O.M.G :roll: :roll:



Please enlighten me as to how this is incorrect?


Okay. I will spell it out for you. You don't have to be poor to be a refugee. The fact that people have money doesn't make them any less a political refugee. Look at the Jews that managed to flee Europe in the late 1930s just prior to World War Two. Hardly struggling for quid but still VERY much refugees.
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Zelezny Chucks » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:25 pm

Leaping Lindner wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:
redden whites wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:It's all very well to agree with our way of doing things but it's not the real refugees that are getting into Australia, it's the ones that can afford to pay a five figure sum to circumvent the process.

O.M.G :roll: :roll:



Please enlighten me as to how this is incorrect?


Okay. I will spell it out for you. You don't have to be poor to be a refugee. The fact that people have money doesn't make them any less a political refugee. Look at the Jews that managed to flee Europe in the late 1930s just prior to World War Two. Hardly struggling for quid but still VERY much refugees.


I don't think people have an issue with people who are genuinely fleeing life threatening situations but it's not like we share a border with any countries, let alone any countries that have these sorts of issues. How many countries, that are safe, have they travelled through before getting on a boat to come to Australia?

Secondly, if the option they have is being detained until their application can be processed, however long that is, or being sent home to certain death then what is the problem? Give them that choice, I know if I had a choice between the two it wouldn't take long to decide. Anyone that whinges about the time in detention probably isn't in a life threatening position back home anyway.
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 95 times
Grassroots Team: Morphett Vale

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Q. » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:35 pm

Zelezny Chucks wrote:
Leaping Lindner wrote:Okay. I will spell it out for you. You don't have to be poor to be a refugee. The fact that people have money doesn't make them any less a political refugee. Look at the Jews that managed to flee Europe in the late 1930s just prior to World War Two. Hardly struggling for quid but still VERY much refugees.


I don't think people have an issue with people who are genuinely fleeing life threatening situations but it's not like we share a border with any countries, let alone any countries that have these sorts of issues. How many countries, that are safe, have they travelled through before getting on a boat to come to Australia?

Secondly, if the option they have is being detained until their application can be processed, however long that is, or being sent home to certain death then what is the problem? Give them that choice, I know if I had a choice between the two it wouldn't take long to decide. Anyone that whinges about the time in detention probably isn't in a life threatening position back home anyway.


Depends where they're coming from, but most countries in from the Middle East to SE Asia are not signatories to the refugee convention.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby redandblack » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:35 pm

They do go to other countries, ZC.

Australia takes a very small proportion of the world's refugees.

We have, like all countries, an obligation under the UN Refugee Convention to accept refugees for processing. They are not illegal. A proportion of the ones who come here would have family already here.

There are currently over 1,000 children refugees on Christmas Island. Over 600 have no father. Many of the fathers were killed under the Saddam Hussein regime.

Asylum seekers make up a tiny proportion of our immigration intake. People who are well-off enough to come here for a holiday, then illegally overstay their visas, outnumber them dramatically.

Strangely enough, there is almost no debate about that problem. We all know why.

Given recent circumstances, I'd hope (futilely) that more Australians would show some compassion towards their fellow human beings who have been through such great trauma.

If they're not genuine refugees, they don't get to stay.

I'm not attracted to your certain death or long-term incarceration choice. I think we as a country can do better than that.
redandblack
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby GWW » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:29 pm

redandblack wrote:Asylum seekers make up a tiny proportion of our immigration intake. People who are well-off enough to come here for a holiday, then illegally overstay their visas, outnumber them dramatically.


How does this article affect the debate r and b?

http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/asyl ... 6008689227
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby redandblack » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:47 pm

It doesn't affect it at all, GWW.

That is a comparison between asylum seekers arriving by boat and plane and isn't relevant to my statement about the total immigration intake (unless you think our total intake is only about 10,000 a year).

Also, is an asylum seeker arriving by plane more worthy somehow?

I'd also be careful of accepting a Courier Mail article at face value, especially one that starts with a sympathetic photo and commentary about that grub Scott Morrison ;)
redandblack
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby GWW » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:50 pm

I take a neutral position on the subject r and b, I don't have a huge opinion one way or another but enjoy reading the debate.

The journo is an SA raised girl, now writes for the local Sunday Mail, i think the Courier just printed it as part of the News Ltd syndicate.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby redandblack » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:54 pm

Yes, you're right about Sam Maiden. I don't blame her for the pic and vomit accompaniment.

Agree also about your neutrality, no problem.
redandblack
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Squawk » Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:26 pm

redandblack wrote:I don't blame her for the pic and vomit accompaniment.


It's time Sam Maiden updated her own pic - she has now put on about a lot of kgs since her current pic was taken - it could be ten years old!
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Leaping Lindner » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:37 pm

redandblack wrote:It doesn't affect it at all, GWW.

That is a comparison between asylum seekers arriving by boat and plane and isn't relevant to my statement about the total immigration intake (unless you think our total intake is only about 10,000 a year).

Also, is an asylum seeker arriving by plane more worthy somehow?

I'd also be careful of accepting a Courier Mail article at face value, especially one that starts with a sympathetic photo and commentary about that grub Scott Morrison ;)


What do you mean? You mean Manning Clark WASN'T a soviet spy???? ;) :lol:
(One for anyone who remembers "news" from the mid 1990s)
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Sheik Yerbouti » Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:54 pm

Leaping Lindner wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:
redden whites wrote:
ORDoubleBlues wrote:It's all very well to agree with our way of doing things but it's not the real refugees that are getting into Australia, it's the ones that can afford to pay a five figure sum to circumvent the process.

O.M.G :roll: :roll:



Please enlighten me as to how this is incorrect?


Okay. I will spell it out for you. You don't have to be poor to be a refugee. The fact that people have money doesn't make them any less a political refugee. Look at the Jews that managed to flee Europe in the late 1930s just prior to World War Two. Hardly struggling for quid but still VERY much refugees.


German ones had to leave 90% of assets with the goosesteppers according to a recent doco.
Hey soccer you owe us 45million.
User avatar
Sheik Yerbouti
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Fuherbunker
Has liked: 201 times
Been liked: 204 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby scoob » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:33 pm

Asylum seekers enjoying their time on Christmas Island...

http://www.news.com.au/national/violent ... 6024047247
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Psyber » Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:50 am

scoob wrote:Asylum seekers enjoying their time on Christmas Island...
http://www.news.com.au/national/violent ... 6024047247
Even the ALP is suggesting this behaviour doesn't make some of them look like good prospective citizens.
On the other hand I have read at least one suggestion that the police should be removed because their presence makes the people tense and that stress triggers the violence.
Chicken and the egg situation alert!
Pick your side and go for it. ;)
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby redandblack » Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:43 am

I understand the frustrations of being detained for a long time, but no-one can condone resorting to violence.

It doesn't help those who don't join in and who are against that sort of action.

I agree it doesn't help their visa prospects.
redandblack
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby smithy » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:49 pm

Maybe the visa applications are being delayed because the govt didn't even know they existed. :oops:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/officials-didnt-know-two-sri-lankans-existed/story-e6frea6u-1226039940502
smithy
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby smithy » Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:16 pm

More rioting in detention centres, this time at Villawood.

Villawood rioting
smithy
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Sojourner » Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:32 pm

They were saying that two of the main proponents of the violence were people that had had their cases for being refugees rejected twice and are currently incarcerated because they are having a third attempt.

Perhaps the Government, both Labor, LIberal and the others need to get together and have a real discussion about the time it takes for people to be processed and how many times court action can be taken when the verdict is no. If someone is clearly not genuine then they need to be able to work through the process quickly and return that person to their country of origin qucikly, leaving them to start problems which have now dragged others into it and given them criminal records in the process helps no one.
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby mick » Wed May 11, 2011 8:00 am

I'm suprised after 3 weeks away, there has been no discussion of the Gillard government's reinstating the Pacific solution to asylum seekers on this forum, come here by boat and you'll end up in Malaysia which has not signed the UN treaty on refugees - nice one Julia -maybe it will stop the boats. :lol: and win a few votes (not a bad pun)
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Leaping Lindner » Mon May 16, 2011 6:48 pm

mick wrote:I'm suprised after 3 weeks away, there has been no discussion of the Gillard government's reinstating the Pacific solution to asylum seekers on this forum, come here by boat and you'll end up in Malaysia which has not signed the UN treaty on refugees - nice one Julia -maybe it will stop the boats. :lol: and win a few votes (not a bad pun)


Processing asylum seekers in Malaysia. What could possibly go wrong? It's not like it's a corrupt regime or anything. :shock:
http://www.radioaustralianews.net.au/st ... tm?desktop
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |