Page 93 of 250

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:54 am
by Booney
Marshall raises a no confidence motion on Rankine. Brock and MHS side with the government ( **** ME!!! ) and the motion fails.

Well done Steven, well played. You know how to waste parliamentary time!

Pleb.

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:06 pm
by tipper
followed up by this from the newly appointed minister: http://www.news.com.au/national/south-a ... 7016617241

i have no idea what he said, but if it is detrimental to the trial of a scum of the earth kiddie fiddler he should go to goal himself

what is christs name did we as a state do wrong to deserve such idiots as our elected representatives?? goes for both "sides" too :(

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:17 pm
by bennymacca
tipper wrote:followed up by this from the newly appointed minister: http://www.news.com.au/national/south-a ... 7016617241

i have no idea what he said, but if it is detrimental to the trial of a scum of the earth kiddie fiddler he should go to goal himself

what is christs name did we as a state do wrong to deserve such idiots as our elected representatives?? goes for both "sides" too :(


Name me a good politician at both state and federal level from both sides.

Although as they say, we elect the parliament we deserve...

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:42 pm
by tipper
thats my point mate, i dont think i can.

and i know the quote, hence why i also asked what we had done to deserve them

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:51 pm
by Jimmy_041
tipper wrote:followed up by this from the newly appointed minister: http://www.news.com.au/national/south-a ... 7016617241

i have no idea what he said, but if it is detrimental to the trial of a scum of the earth kiddie fiddler he should go to goal himself

what is christs name did we as a state do wrong to deserve such idiots as our elected representatives?? goes for both "sides" too :(


What he actually said is in today's Australian
Again, he shows he's a numbskull
After dodgy docs and this, I'm glad I never served under him in a war

The most damning thing about all this is Rankine knew there had been a complaint about the person the year before and stood there and said there hadn't been.
David Waterford did the same thing, realised he'd f***ed up and resigned
Rankine has been found out and said what she said wasn't misleading :shock: Well Minister, staying silent when you know something is not correct is as culpable as denying it. You did both.
Waterford must be thinking WTF to himself. He just screwed up badly and lost his job. He didn't lie or deliberately mislead.
Jay4SA and Mighty Marty might have confidence in her, but that reflects on them more than anything else

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:01 pm
by tipper
agree Jimmy. they seem to be dealing with it the same way my 5 year old argues with me, complete denial despite all the evidence to the contrary... "no its not"....

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:06 pm
by stan
Booney wrote:Marshall raises a no confidence motion on Rankine. Brock and MHS side with the government ( **** ME!!! ) and the motion fails.

Well done Steven, well played. You know how to waste parliamentary time!

Pleb.


Even when there were rumblings of this happening, it was known then it would fail and be a waste of time. Such a waste of time and just a stunt.

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:07 pm
by stan
tipper wrote:followed up by this from the newly appointed minister: http://www.news.com.au/national/south-a ... 7016617241

i have no idea what he said, but if it is detrimental to the trial of a scum of the earth kiddie fiddler he should go to goal himself

what is christs name did we as a state do wrong to deserve such idiots as our elected representatives?? goes for both "sides" too :(


At the end of the day, we have ourselves to blame really.

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:47 pm
by Jimmy_041
I went to listen to our great Premier yesterday
Here is a copy of his visionary speech if you're interested
God help us if this is all he has

For a person who exclaimed how his Govt wants to work in tandem with business; he severely lacks any understanding of how business actually works.

There was actually a low chuckle when he mentioned that the banks are onboard. Of course they are. Nothing like a Govt guarantee as another level of of security. The general discussion afterwards was that borrowing money is not actually that much of a problem at the moment unless you have a disastrous business plan. Is this what we will be guaranteeing? And $50m?

http://indaily.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/CEDA-11-August-14.pdf

I thought of Stan's quote when I was sitting there: At the end of the day, we have ourselves to blame really. and also Let's go Team SA

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:52 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
during that speech was that when Jay called for us to 'quietly stand up for SA' or something along those lines??

too lazy to worry about links!

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:52 pm
by Jimmy_041
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:during that speech was that when Jay called for us to 'quietly stand up for SA' or something along those lines??

too lazy to worry about links!


That's where the thought \:D/ Let's go Team SA \:D/ entered my head
Has he really copied "Team Australia"?

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:21 pm
by bennymacca
I find the whole team thing pretty repulsive. I like to think we are team world!

In before Captain Planet jokes :)

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:24 pm
by Jimmy_041
“And if you hear someone bagging us, you know, stand up for South Australia,”

Over my life, I must have seen thousands of Mission Statements and Visions.
They are all useless unless there are goals and a practical and tangible plan to achieve them.
That's what sorts out the wheat from the chaff, the bull$hit from the meaningful.

Here's what the Premier said:
What I will not do today is describe the key outcomes we want to see over the next three years for each priority


That's to ensure they are totally unaccountable in 3 years time. They can say see what we achieved even though it might only be a drop in unemployment of 1%. I love the way he tried to take some credit for the achievements of Beach. I couldn't see them there, but I reckon they would have choked on their bread rolls

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 3:39 pm
by gossipgirl
Jimmy_041 wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:during that speech was that when Jay called for us to 'quietly stand up for SA' or something along those lines??

too lazy to worry about links!


That's where the thought \:D/ Let's go Team SA \:D/ entered my head
Has he really copied "Team Australia"?



Should we Holla for a Marshall :D

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:07 pm
by Jimmy_041
The other thing that came out of the CEDA lunch was the absolute contempt Weatherill has for anyone that questions him on the high cost of doing business in this State. Basically, it's a figment of your imagination and we're not going to do anything about it.
TeamSA seems to be very one dimensional on costs.

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:08 pm
by stan
bennymacca wrote:I find the whole team thing pretty repulsive. I like to think we are team world!

In before Captain Planet jokes :)

Go Planet!

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:48 pm
by Jimmy_041
Still one of the best films I've ever seen



Best scene


Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 6:03 pm
by stan
Jimmy_041 wrote:The other thing that came out of the CEDA lunch was the absolute contempt Weatherill has for anyone that questions him on the high cost of doing business in this State. Basically, it's a figment of your imagination and we're not going to do anything about it.
TeamSA seems to be very one dimensional on costs.

Yeah its all in our heads. My power and water bills are a figment of my imagination..........

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 8:45 am
by stan
Jimmy_041 wrote:The other thing that came out of the CEDA lunch was the absolute contempt Weatherill has for anyone that questions him on the high cost of doing business in this State. Basically, it's a figment of your imagination and we're not going to do anything about it.
TeamSA seems to be very one dimensional on costs.

Team SA **** yeah!

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 2:02 pm
by stan
Jimmy_041 wrote:I went to listen to our great Premier yesterday
Here is a copy of his visionary speech if you're interested
God help us if this is all he has

For a person who exclaimed how his Govt wants to work in tandem with business; he severely lacks any understanding of how business actually works.

There was actually a low chuckle when he mentioned that the banks are onboard. Of course they are. Nothing like a Govt guarantee as another level of of security. The general discussion afterwards was that borrowing money is not actually that much of a problem at the moment unless you have a disastrous business plan. Is this what we will be guaranteeing? And $50m?

http://indaily.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/CEDA-11-August-14.pdf

I thought of Stan's quote when I was sitting there: At the end of the day, we have ourselves to blame really. and also Let's go Team SA


Well thanks for credit from that quote.

On what was being talked out, well actually borrowing money is an issue, but not so much getting it. Investors are currently looking at returns carefully at the moment and if there not going to get this return then they arent going to be progressing with major development projects. I mean why would you if its going not going to do what the intention is. The problem for our friend dancing Jay (From the election commercials when he was trying to look dynamic I nick named him dancing Jay) is that besides the Government funded projects, there is not alot else happening. Construction is slower, although housing is going ok-ish at the moment, generally the state is struggling. How can this be turned around, well a bunch of people get made redundant for pubic and private sector jobs is not a good start. A bunch of people form Holdens worrying about there future is not going to help either.

As for the notion that its not more expenisve to do business here in SA, well dancing jay if thats what you think then maybe you should just keep on dancing.

Team SA - **** yeah.