by Cambridge Clarrie » Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:54 pm
by redandblack » Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:28 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:His reaction was a little spooky, but for it to disqualify him from ever being PM...
You've been smoking some weird **** R&B...
by fish » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:49 pm
by dedja » Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:32 pm
fish wrote:IMHO I thought the "sh$% happens" comment was pretty harmless in itself.
But his inability to provide an answer to the subsequent question just confirms that he's a fool.
by oldfella » Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:55 pm
by Darth Vader » Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:42 pm
oldfella wrote:I have a small military background and have no problems with his comment.
I do have problems with the tool (shadow minister) that went in to defend him and claimed he was ambushed - nice try but I will find it hard to believe you in the future tool.
by cripple » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:03 pm
Darth Vader wrote:oldfella wrote:I have a small military background and have no problems with his comment.
I do have problems with the tool (shadow minister) that went in to defend him and claimed he was ambushed - nice try but I will find it hard to believe you in the future tool.
Do you have any problem with Gillards crocodile tears in the House of Reps when she delivered her well rehearsed speech on the Queensland floods? I believe the scenario was written by a policy advisor, approved by her inner sanctum and she was clearly coached by a drama teacher. Got a 100% approval by the party and scored a big fat zero with the rest of us.
by Darth Vader » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:18 pm
cripple wrote:Darth Vader wrote:oldfella wrote:I have a small military background and have no problems with his comment.
I do have problems with the tool (shadow minister) that went in to defend him and claimed he was ambushed - nice try but I will find it hard to believe you in the future tool.
Do you have any problem with Gillards crocodile tears in the House of Reps when she delivered her well rehearsed speech on the Queensland floods? I believe the scenario was written by a policy advisor, approved by her inner sanctum and she was clearly coached by a drama teacher. Got a 100% approval by the party and scored a big fat zero with the rest of us.
Speech might have been written by someone else, but it is pretty hard to fake emotion. I dare say jules personal experience from seeing the floods first hand would have given her plenty of natural emotion towards the subject.
The way you view both of these cases with Abbott and Gillard are almost entirely dependent on the way your political wang swings. I still think Abbott is a dick and should not be allowed to lead a pack of dogs let alone a country, whilst Gillard does a better job but still leaves plenty to be desired.
by oldfella » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:41 pm
by Darth Vader » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:49 pm
oldfella wrote:Darth - try not to turn everything into a liberal-labor crusade in an attempt to divert.
This is important as it is a question of disrespect for soldiers who died - in this case as I said before I have no problems with what he said - for that matter I have no real problems with the stonewall but do have problems when an associate tries to twist the truth (straight lie) to muddy the water
by cripple » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:53 pm
Darth Vader wrote:oldfella wrote:Darth - try not to turn everything into a liberal-labor crusade in an attempt to divert.
This is important as it is a question of disrespect for soldiers who died - in this case as I said before I have no problems with what he said - for that matter I have no real problems with the stonewall but do have problems when an associate tries to twist the truth (straight lie) to muddy the water
I din't see it that way. I saw a guy coming to the aid of his leader who was seriously ambushed by a dickbrained tv journalist trying to grab ratings at the expense of a fallen soldier. The whole incident was awful. Abbott - like any reasonable person - was infuriated and simply lost his way.
by Darth Vader » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:57 pm
by fish » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:11 pm
Journalist: Tony, what's your analysis of the recent events in Egypt and the wider ramifications for the Middle East?cripple wrote:Would hate him to not know what to say when given a curly one by the yanks, poms or chinese.
by Darth Vader » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:16 pm
by Strawb » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:32 pm
by Squawk » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:13 am
by dedja » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:56 am
by redandblack » Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:33 am
Squawk wrote:All this analysis over 20 seconds of silence.
No analysis of the fact the footage was filmed in October; it was of what appeared to be a conversation being held in private; and no one present complained at the time or in the 4 months since. It wasn't even Channel 7 footage - it was FOI footage. And it wasn't like Abbott was being flippant at the time he said it - it almost came across as reflective of the reality of war.
The silence wasn't good but I suspect it was better than a fit of rage.
by Darth Vader » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:21 am
Strawb wrote:According to my 4 year old son Tony Abbott is a Douchebag
by cripple » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:41 am
Darth Vader wrote:Strawb wrote:According to my 4 year old son Tony Abbott is a Douchebag
Geez I find this comment really disturbing on two levels.
Firstly brain-washing the mind of a four year old to ensure the guaranteed continuation of the politial bias of the parents
Secondly that your four year old would even be familiar with such a term as douchebag
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |