redandblack wrote:So we can also discount what Tony Abbott says, because he has an agenda against the Labor Party?
How about debating his argument, rather than his supposed motives.
He makes a lot of sense.
Hence why I used the word may. Did I say completely discount it anywhere?
So you would take anything Tony Abbott says against the Labor party as truth then?
What argument has he made? He doesn't even know the difference between a race and a religion.
He claims Howard tapped into the fear started by Pauline Hanson, he didn't bring up any evidence to back that up. And Morrison questioning the costs of the funerals, where is the racism? Wrong perhaps, but not racist.
And Bernardi comments on Halal food
"Their insistence of consuming Halal food means that in many countries (including Australia) most of us are unknowingly eating food slaughtered in the name of Allah. I, for one, don't want to eat meat butchered in the name of an ideology that is mired in sixth century brutality and is an anathema to my own values"
Clearly having a go, rightly or wrongly, against an idealology. Not a race. Are you saying that Islam is not stained by it's brutal and dark age roots the same as Christianity and Judaism?
He has made no argument at all.