by PhilG » Wed May 09, 2007 6:54 pm
by heater31 » Wed May 09, 2007 8:26 pm
PhilG wrote:heater31 wrote:PhilG wrote:heater31 wrote:PhilG wrote:*Budget surplus of $10.6 billion
What was the surplus last financial year, someone?
one percent of GDP like it has been for the last few budgets as Mr Costello informed me when i flicked over to the budget wrap on ABC
That doesn't tell me anything, Heater. Sorry.
well yes it does it is 1% of GDP all you need to do is find out the GDP figure for last year and take out 1% of that. so looking at the ABS website GDP had a 2.4% growth last year so the budget surplus has risen also 2.4%
Which translates to how much money? That's what I want to know and you're chucking useless percentages at me!
by mick » Wed May 09, 2007 9:02 pm
by Squawk » Thu May 10, 2007 12:45 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:All right honourable members (?) of SAFooty
let the debate begin........
In a snapshot....
Treasurer delivers an election year budget aimed at the battlers, the elderly and middle Australia
Budget surplus of $10.6 billion - pretty good but could be better$31.5 billion in tax cuts over four years
Low income tax offset to increase to $750 per year - good
40 per cent threshold to rise to $80,000 from July 2008 - compensates for bracket creep
$22.3 billion over five years from 2009-10 for road and rail infrastructure - most will go to the eastern seaboard so not much benefit likely to be seen in SA
Child care benefit to increase by 10 per cent. Very good (and I am a DINK)
Doubling of rebates for household solar panels to $8000 - regardless of whether this restoring the previous rebate or not, is a real incentive to us all to think about it seriously - for the hip pocket and for the environment.
$10 billion over 10 years to safeguard water supply - is this enough?
$5 billion grant for universities - great initiative
$3.5 billion to promote 'flexibility and diversity' in higher education sounds warm and fuzzy to me - what does it really mean?
$6.1 billion over 10 years for defence personnel recruitment and retention - change foreign policy and we wont need this. The Swiss model is a good benchmark to start with. Not gonna happen so lets move on from Iraq and Afghanistan and worry about Zimbabwe for a change.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/05/08/1178390301146.html
by redandblack » Thu May 10, 2007 9:28 am
mick wrote:I saw Wayne Swan the other night after the Budget.....who would trust this man with our country's finances whilst taking orders from comrade Gillard and her mates on the socialist left ? Yep let's sacrifice our economic prosperity, in the name of some illusory moral superiority. I still remember that lying bastard Keating defeated hewson and the GST but raised taxes straight after the '93 election, yeah and the 17% interest rates he was responsible in the late 1980s. On the weekend before the budget I was with a fairly mixed group of people, all employed, aspirational or self funded retirees, while most think Mr Rudd is the best thing Labor has come up with in years, consensus was if it ain't broke why change it. I'm going out on a limb here, I'm predicting a comfortable win for the coalition in December
by Psyber » Thu May 10, 2007 9:49 pm
Squawk wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:All right honourable members (?) of SAFooty
let the debate begin........
In a snapshot.....................................................................
$6.1 billion over 10 years for defence personnel recruitment and retention - change foreign policy and we wont need this. The Swiss model is a good benchmark to start with. Not gonna happen so lets move on from Iraq and Afghanistan and worry about Zimbabwe for a change.
by heater31 » Thu May 10, 2007 10:09 pm
Psyber wrote:At that point some nice rockets and a neutron bomb or two might prove useful. I like Neutron Bombs - they take out all the nasty people without wrecking the infrastructure or the art works. It was very sensible of the French to develop them.![]()
by mick » Fri May 11, 2007 9:46 am
by Dogwatcher » Fri May 11, 2007 12:28 pm
by RustyCage » Fri May 11, 2007 1:12 pm
by our_longreach » Fri May 11, 2007 3:00 pm
by Coorong » Fri May 11, 2007 4:35 pm
by RustyCage » Fri May 11, 2007 4:44 pm
Coorong wrote:I have a "friend" who's family (herself included) are extreme left. With some past labour members amongst them. As a unit they admit the ALP cannot succeed this time, although they have great aspirations for the future with Gillard.
by redandblack » Fri May 11, 2007 5:04 pm
Coorong wrote:I have a "friend" who's family (herself included) are extreme left. With some past labour members amongst them. As a unit they admit the ALP cannot succeed this time, although they have great aspirations for the future with Gillard.
by Coorong » Fri May 11, 2007 5:15 pm
redandblack wrote:Coorong wrote:I have a "friend" who's family (herself included) are extreme left. With some past labour members amongst them. As a unit they admit the ALP cannot succeed this time, although they have great aspirations for the future with Gillard.
That's it then, the election's over.
No point discussing it further
by Psyber » Sat May 12, 2007 12:13 am
pafc1870 wrote:I think the problem for the ALP was the Coalition aimed their budget at the families, a typical election year budget where they piss in the pockets of anyone stupid enough to beleive their pre election crap. The ALPs response seemed to be more of a typical non election year type budget less aimed at conning votes and aimed more at business and economy issues.
As people here know more than me on this issue, is my thinking right here?
by TroyGFC » Sat May 12, 2007 8:47 am
by mick » Sat May 12, 2007 8:00 pm
Coorong wrote:I have a "friend" who's family (herself included) are extreme left. With some past labour members amongst them. As a unit they admit the ALP cannot succeed this time, although they have great aspirations for the future with Gillard.
by McAlmanac » Sun May 13, 2007 3:27 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |