The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:32 pm

Magellan wrote:
stan wrote:

Nah they were fine. Apparently a few vic towns might needed to have been shed so that NSW all had power......

Im sure that would gone down well.

This national energy market is working well.

Can't have NSW suffering, everything important in Australia happens there.

Victoria are very happy with this. Also askng for a please explain.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1317 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:54 am

stan wrote:
Magellan wrote:
stan wrote:

Nah they were fine. Apparently a few vic towns might needed to have been shed so that NSW all had power......

Im sure that would gone down well.

This national energy market is working well.

Can't have NSW suffering, everything important in Australia happens there.

Victoria are very happy with this. Also askng for a please explain.


Jay would have rung Dan and got him on board the whinge train
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15042
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 825 times
Been liked: 1271 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:02 am

Jimmy_041 wrote:
stan wrote:
Magellan wrote:

Nah they were fine. Apparently a few vic towns might needed to have been shed so that NSW all had power......

Im sure that would gone down well.

This national energy market is working well.

Can't have NSW suffering, everything important in Australia happens there.

Victoria are very happy with this. Also askng for a please explain.


Jay would have rung Dan and got him on board the whinge train[/quote]
I dont know about that, I feel Victoria have a case here. They carried themselves and a few other states and then had the risk of load shedding themselves.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1317 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:47 am

The interesting thing is how Jay has now thrown BHP under the bus to save his own political life

So much for the business friendly state with these idiots in charge
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15042
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 825 times
Been liked: 1271 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Psyber » Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:34 pm

Psyber wrote:Molten salt has also been being kicked around for a long time without being taken up in any substantial way.

Here is another option.
It will be interesting to see which system wins the storage race.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-08/v ... ge/8094376
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery

However modern safe fission offers unlimited capacity and ongoing supply when storage may run out after several days of poor input from renewable sources.


I came across this additional variant today:
https://onestepoffthegrid.com.au/redflo ... ge-market/
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 404 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Grenville » Fri Mar 03, 2017 6:10 pm

Minister for burnouts Tom Kuntzanarnus has assured us the fires at Torrens Island power facility are all sweet. I'm convinced.
User avatar
Grenville
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:53 pm
Has liked: 262 times
Been liked: 761 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:16 pm

Grenville wrote:Minister for burnouts Tom Kuntzanarnus has assured us the fires at Torrens Island power facility are all sweet. I'm convinced.

A transform exploded. The fire is out but we are a bit ****** now because we feed from B plant. Well until the switchyard and the transformer is repaired and or replaced.

So Tom right. Fire no worries. But no power either.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1317 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:24 am

Nick X starting up SA Best for the State election
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60803
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13372 times
Been liked: 4614 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Gozu » Wed Mar 08, 2017 2:39 pm

The South Australian Government should consider buying or leasing a gas-fired electricity generator to help stabilise the state's expensive and unreliable power supply, South Australia's influential Economic Development Board says.

The recommendation was made to the Government late last month, according to evidence given to the SA Parliament's Statutory Authorities Review Committee.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-07/t ... on/8331228

Interesting
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13828
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 680 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Wed Mar 08, 2017 4:46 pm

Gozu wrote:
The South Australian Government should consider buying or leasing a gas-fired electricity generator to help stabilise the state's expensive and unreliable power supply, South Australia's influential Economic Development Board says.

The recommendation was made to the Government late last month, according to evidence given to the SA Parliament's Statutory Authorities Review Committee.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-07/t ... on/8331228

Interesting

Yea but Jays not keen. Would have been a good idea. Also when Alinta offered up Northern the should have taken that. Imagine having Northern and Pelican Point controlled by the government, would be an interesting situation. But Jay said the government dont want to get back into power generation.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1317 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:55 pm

stan wrote:
Gozu wrote:
The South Australian Government should consider buying or leasing a gas-fired electricity generator to help stabilise the state's expensive and unreliable power supply, South Australia's influential Economic Development Board says.

The recommendation was made to the Government late last month, according to evidence given to the SA Parliament's Statutory Authorities Review Committee.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-07/t ... on/8331228

Interesting

Yea but Jays not keen. Would have been a good idea. Also when Alinta offered up Northern the should have taken that. Imagine having Northern and Pelican Point controlled by the government, would be an interesting situation. But Jay said the government dont want to get back into power generation.


Apart from the $500m hit to debt (which has already risen about $3Bn in this term of govt despite the lies and financial magic), it is clear Weatherill has no plan to fix the problem. There is a current energy strategic plan: http://saplan.org.au/targets/64-renewable-energy That's working well for everyone. Still, Turbo blames the Feds
Amazing that the Energy Minister conveniently ignores the fact that he was abundantly warned by both his department (which, astonishingly, he says he never read) and the EDB in July last year, he continues to blame everyone else.
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15042
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 825 times
Been liked: 1271 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Psyber » Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:01 pm

The campaigns are warming up. I interviewed one of the 5 candidates for the Liberal Party nomination for Heysen today, as, unlike in the ALP selection process, they have to win the support of party members in the electorate who get to vote on who gets the nomination as candidate, and not just the party bureaucrats.

One plus is that he is not a lawyer - my argument is that lawyers are more interested in winning the argument than deciding what would be best - and most of my lawyer friends concede that point.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 404 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 10, 2017 8:31 am

Psyber wrote:The campaigns are warming up. I interviewed one of the 5 candidates for the Liberal Party nomination for Heysen today, as, unlike in the ALP selection process, they have to win the support of party members in the electorate who get to vote on who gets the nomination as candidate, and not just the party bureaucrats.

One plus is that he is not a lawyer - my argument is that lawyers are more interested in winning the argument than deciding what would be best - and most of my lawyer friends concede that point.


Any chance you fine chaps send someone worthy of consideration into Port Adelaide? Look, lamb to the slaughter I know, but it's one seat that needs a shake up and the last two elections the candidate has stepped forward ( or all others stepped back ) about 2 weeks from the election.

Whilst it's a strongly held seat people are starting to look at alternatives, options, I've got a feeling X will have a crack in the area.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61307
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8128 times
Been liked: 11853 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:09 am

Safe Labor seat down that way, Liberals won't waste their money
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60803
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13372 times
Been liked: 4614 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:13 am

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Safe Labor seat down that way, Liberals won't waste their money


I agree, but as I said the winds of change are blowing and I expect Mr X and his team to have a crack in the area, the "old" people of the Port are starting to disappear and maybe not this election but I certainly believe the next could see a swing in the area away from Labor. I'd be pushing in now if I were either X or Lib.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61307
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8128 times
Been liked: 11853 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:15 am

Yeah the X factor would and should.
Liberals I don't think would.
I'm assuming Labor have got complacent down there.

Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60803
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13372 times
Been liked: 4614 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby bennymacca » Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:36 am

Safe seats of either side are bad
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:41 am

bennymacca wrote:Safe seats of either side are bad


Absolutely.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61307
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8128 times
Been liked: 11853 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Psyber » Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:56 am

Booney wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Safe Labor seat down that way, Liberals won't waste their money


I agree, but as I said the winds of change are blowing and I expect Mr X and his team to have a crack in the area, the "old" people of the Port are starting to disappear and maybe not this election but I certainly believe the next could see a swing in the area away from Labor. I'd be pushing in now if I were either X or Lib.

It can happen. I remember a time in the 1980s when the ALP Caucus put up an outsider from the left faction for Semaphore over a local candidate who was the secretary of the local ALP branch. Locals were irate about he outsider they referred to as "That bloody Commo!", and the local Secretary quit the ALP and romped it in as an independent candidate.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 404 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:33 pm

Honestly this has to be the election the libs win. Surely they couldn't stuff up, surely.

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1317 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |