by Booney » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:59 am
by Wedgie » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:17 am
Booney wrote:@Wedgie
Boeing to employ 250 in Adelaide, system engineers, system analysts etc.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/ ... 98a2801e2b
by Magellan » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:50 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Grenville wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Better people have resigned for less
I wasn't here when Olsen quit so don't know much about it
It seems they have one set of rules for Parliament and another outside
John Olsen is a disgraceful 'human being'. An even slimier version of the current Labor clown in charge.
I had to think back to David Tonkin for the last "decent" Premier
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:30 am
Magellan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Grenville wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Better people have resigned for less
I wasn't here when Olsen quit so don't know much about it
It seems they have one set of rules for Parliament and another outside
John Olsen is a disgraceful 'human being'. An even slimier version of the current Labor clown in charge.
I had to think back to David Tonkin for the last "decent" Premier
What was Tonkins' legacy? It seemed like he was premier for about half an hour.
by Magellan » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:08 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:But his main legacy was a couple of smashing daughters
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:47 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Apr 07, 2017 4:36 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Pics or gtfo
by Booney » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:18 am
by Grenville » Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:31 pm
Booney wrote:Is it a bikini or one of those 1950's demure numbers?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:30 pm
by stan » Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:51 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The Jetty Rd closure is a debacle
by stan » Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:56 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 02, 2017 3:09 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Tue May 02, 2017 3:59 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:How has Leesa Vlahos kept her position??
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 02, 2017 4:03 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:How has Leesa Vlahos kept her position??
Compare her actions to the rest of them and she's just average
If Weatherill can completely ignore his personal responsibility for the lack of child protection, why should Vlahos fall on her sword?
Funny how the lies are getting outed (again, same as the rest of them)
by Jimmy_041 » Tue May 02, 2017 4:08 pm
Weatherill defended Vlahos, saying she should not be criticised for her actions.
“The reality is that if the minister had not instituted this inquiry we would not have been aware of the depth of the concerns at this institution. And rather than criticism she should be acknowledged for the fact that she has shone a light on this facility…”
“She has my full support.”
Vlahos has repeatedly stated that she ordered the review – a claim repeated by Weatherill today – but the degree to which the minister was personally responsible for “shining a light” on concerns at Oakden remains unclear.
The CEO of the Northern Adelaide Local Health Network [NALHN], Jackie Hanson, requested and designed the review – the Minister approved the request.
The introduction and background to the review – which does not mention any intervention by Vlahos – suggests Hanson was its animating force.
On 20 December last year, it says, Hanson “requested the Chief Psychiatrist undertake an external independent review of the Oaken facility as a matter of urgency with the intention of providing a report in April 2017”.
A spokesperson for SA Health told InDaily that the department’s CEO Vickie Kaminski and Vlahos met the previous day to approve Hanson’s request for an inquiry into the Oakden facility.
Hanson also designed the scope of the review.
“From the outset, it was clear that the CEO [of] NALHN wanted the review to be extensive and to look into all matters relevant to the clinical care of all consumers within the Oakden facility, and not be restricted to any one individual,” the review reads.
“It was clear she wanted no stone unturned in getting to the bottom of the issues.”
by stan » Wed May 03, 2017 11:43 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:They have been trotting out this "she should be commended for shining a light on it"
Well, Indaily have a different version of events:Weatherill defended Vlahos, saying she should not be criticised for her actions.
“The reality is that if the minister had not instituted this inquiry we would not have been aware of the depth of the concerns at this institution. And rather than criticism she should be acknowledged for the fact that she has shone a light on this facility…”
“She has my full support.”
Vlahos has repeatedly stated that she ordered the review – a claim repeated by Weatherill today – but the degree to which the minister was personally responsible for “shining a light” on concerns at Oakden remains unclear.
The CEO of the Northern Adelaide Local Health Network [NALHN], Jackie Hanson, requested and designed the review – the Minister approved the request.
The introduction and background to the review – which does not mention any intervention by Vlahos – suggests Hanson was its animating force.
On 20 December last year, it says, Hanson “requested the Chief Psychiatrist undertake an external independent review of the Oaken facility as a matter of urgency with the intention of providing a report in April 2017”.
A spokesperson for SA Health told InDaily that the department’s CEO Vickie Kaminski and Vlahos met the previous day to approve Hanson’s request for an inquiry into the Oakden facility.
Hanson also designed the scope of the review.
“From the outset, it was clear that the CEO [of] NALHN wanted the review to be extensive and to look into all matters relevant to the clinical care of all consumers within the Oakden facility, and not be restricted to any one individual,” the review reads.
“It was clear she wanted no stone unturned in getting to the bottom of the issues.”
Funny how these people will easily take credit for doing something right but its always someone's fault for the lack of action or complete ****up
by Booney » Wed May 03, 2017 11:48 am
by stan » Wed May 03, 2017 4:24 pm
Booney wrote:We're 49 days into the 90 test period of the nRAH since practical completion was announced.
That doesn't mean we're 41 days from it opening....
by Booney » Wed May 03, 2017 4:44 pm
stan wrote:Booney wrote:We're 49 days into the 90 test period of the nRAH since practical completion was announced.
That doesn't mean we're 41 days from it opening....
We expecting for it all to go bad at some point mate?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |