Leaping Lindner wrote:They were saying 500,000 absentee/pre poll votes have to be counted. That's a shirtload of votes to come.
We should know the result by Monday some people are saying and that is alot of absentee votes.
by Strawb » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:00 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:They were saying 500,000 absentee/pre poll votes have to be counted. That's a shirtload of votes to come.
by dedja » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:19 pm
by McAlmanac » Sun Nov 28, 2010 11:12 am
dedja wrote:The decision of the Libs to preference the Greens last has cost the coalition certain victory.
by Leaping Lindner » Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:37 pm
by Strawb » Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:10 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:Funny/sad listening to talk back radio this morning, and the amount of people that rang in saying they voted Liberal (supposedly for the first time) because of problems with the public health system. Whilst there is no denying that the Brumby Government has made a mess of the health system in this state of late I am struggling to think of ANY Liberal government (Federal or State) that has IMPROVED the public health system anywhere.
by Sojourner » Sun Nov 28, 2010 6:41 pm
dedja wrote:2 things are very clear ...
It will take quite a while to determine whether the coalition wins outright or whether there is a hung parliament.
The decision of the Libs to preference the Greens last has cost the coalition certain victory.
by Leaping Lindner » Sun Nov 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Strawb wrote:Leaping Lindner wrote:Funny/sad listening to talk back radio this morning, and the amount of people that rang in saying they voted Liberal (supposedly for the first time) because of problems with the public health system. Whilst there is no denying that the Brumby Government has made a mess of the health system in this state of late I am struggling to think of ANY Liberal government (Federal or State) that has IMPROVED the public health system anywhere.
LL I am waiting for the complaints to start if the Libs win on how much that they have cut spending on Education, Police, Health
by mick » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:18 am
McAlmanac wrote:dedja wrote:The decision of the Libs to preference the Greens last has cost the coalition certain victory.
No, it has just saved the Coalition from the moral dilemma of having to deal with the party that they put last on their how-to-vote cards.
by Psyber » Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:25 am
I'm struggling to think of any government that has improved the public health system in my lifetime.Leaping Lindner wrote:Funny/sad listening to talk back radio this morning, and the amount of people that rang in saying they voted Liberal (supposedly for the first time) because of problems with the public health system. Whilst there is no denying that the Brumby Government has made a mess of the health system in this state of late I am struggling to think of ANY Liberal government (Federal or State) that has IMPROVED the public health system anywhere.
by mick » Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:32 am
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:52 am
mick wrote:McAlmanac wrote:dedja wrote:The decision of the Libs to preference the Greens last has cost the coalition certain victory.
No, it has just saved the Coalition from the moral dilemma of having to deal with the party that they put last on their how-to-vote cards.
Could not agree more, the ALP can at least form a credible government, the Coalition has more common ground with the ALP than the Greens. No Greens in parliament is a good outcome
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:56 am
Psyber wrote:I'm struggling to think of any government that has improved the public health system in my lifetime.Leaping Lindner wrote:Funny/sad listening to talk back radio this morning, and the amount of people that rang in saying they voted Liberal (supposedly for the first time) because of problems with the public health system. Whilst there is no denying that the Brumby Government has made a mess of the health system in this state of late I am struggling to think of ANY Liberal government (Federal or State) that has IMPROVED the public health system anywhere.
I worked in public health from February 1968 until the end of 1975 when I finally got sick of the increasing bureaucracy and walked. I still remember the date - November 24th 1975.
[ I set it to qualify for my pro-rata long service leave when I gave notice.]
Subsequent interactions trying to liaise with the public system about uninsured patients in greater need than I could provide in private demonstrated it has only continued to get worse.
It was the same in both SA and Victoria.
by Ronnie » Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:26 pm
by Psyber » Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:30 pm
I arrived there in January 1999, not very long before he lost the election.Leaping Lindner wrote: Where you in victoria at the time of Cun...um sorry Kennett.. Psyber? He should be strung up for what he did to the Health System(and education system)in this state whilst pouring millions into "that" Casino and "that" Car Race.
Patients die as politicians dither
AN EMERGENCY medicine physician says patients throughout Australia are still dying unnecessarily as they wait in emergency departments (EDs) for a hospital bed.
The accusation is based on a nationwide ED snapshot taken in September that showed three-quarters of hospitals had access block.
Associate Professor Drew Richardson, chair of road trauma and emergency medicine at Australian National University Medical School, said even though politicians and health departments had been shown the facts and patients were still dying while waiting for beds, there had been no significant improvement in access block in the past year.
Access block is defined by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) as the situation where patients are unable to gain access to appropriate hospital beds within a reasonable time, which is defined as no greater than 8 hours.
by mick » Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:55 pm
by Strawb » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:07 pm
mick wrote:Brumby has just conceded, it will be interesting to see whether the Coalition will persist with preferencing the Greens last in the upcoming NSW and QLD elections.
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:17 pm
mick wrote:Brumby has just conceded, it will be interesting to see whether the Coalition will persist with preferencing the Greens last in the upcoming NSW and QLD elections.
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:22 pm
Strawb wrote:mick wrote:Brumby has just conceded, it will be interesting to see whether the Coalition will persist with preferencing the Greens last in the upcoming NSW and QLD elections.
No idea but if Bellyache doesn;t do what he says he will he will be bounced out at the next election. Providing Labor gets rid of Bumbles.
by Strawb » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:26 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:Strawb wrote:mick wrote:Brumby has just conceded, it will be interesting to see whether the Coalition will persist with preferencing the Greens last in the upcoming NSW and QLD elections.
No idea but if Bellyache doesn;t do what he says he will he will be bounced out at the next election. Providing Labor gets rid of Bumbles.
Now that Peter Ryan is deputy premier I'm building a white picket fence just before I go off to do National Service. It's funny how people always seem to conveniently forget that these nutbags are part of the coaliton.
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:35 pm
Strawb wrote:Yes that is true I wonder what will be happening there with the coalition. I have always wondered if the Nationals spilt from the coalition how would the libs ever hold government?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |