There are some advantages to embracing Islam - four sounds about right...fish wrote:I'm not getting married until I meet the right small group of women!mick wrote:I havn't given up on women, I just won't marry one (again)
by Psyber » Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:40 pm
There are some advantages to embracing Islam - four sounds about right...fish wrote:I'm not getting married until I meet the right small group of women!mick wrote:I havn't given up on women, I just won't marry one (again)
by mick » Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:36 am
Psyber wrote:There are some advantages to embracing Islam - four sounds about right...fish wrote:I'm not getting married until I meet the right small group of women!mick wrote:I havn't given up on women, I just won't marry one (again)
by Psyber » Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:14 am
The medical solution is to put them all on the "pill" but carefully out of synchronisation.mick wrote: Not if they are all having their period at the same timeAs a medical man you know about the phenomenon of synchronised menstrual cylces of women living together? Imagine copping **** from four simultaneously. Concubines living in separate houses is perhaps the solution.
by dedja » Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:47 pm
mick wrote:Psyber wrote:There are some advantages to embracing Islam - four sounds about right...fish wrote:I'm not getting married until I meet the right small group of women!mick wrote:I havn't given up on women, I just won't marry one (again)
Not if they are all having their period at the same timeAs a medical man you know about the phenomenon of synchronised menstrual cylces of women living together? Imagine copping **** from four simultaneously. Concubines living in separate houses is perhaps the solution.
by fish » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:01 am
by Pseudo » Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:49 pm
fish wrote:France began military action in the face of initial US reluctance, starting the assault earlier on Saturday (local time) with a series of air strikes.
by redandblack » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:03 pm
by dedja » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:05 pm
by Q. » Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:40 pm
by Psyber » Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:20 pm
dedja wrote:Unfortunately, the West only give a rats when there's oil around ...
by Bat Pad » Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:34 pm
Psyber wrote:dedja wrote:Unfortunately, the West only give a rats when there's oil around ...
Sadly, there has been truth in that, as the historical record shows.It does seem the US may have learned from Iraq that even a nominally Christian force cannot occupy a Muslim country without generating a backlash.
That applies no matter how happy the inhabitants were for the aid in deposing the dictator in the first place.
by Squawk » Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:12 pm
by Psyber » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:55 pm
You could, for example, make a case that Indonesian oil was a factor in the US [and Oz] not raising a fuss when western New Guinea was annexed by military invasion, and turned into West Irian in the mid 1970s.Bat Pad wrote: How far are we going back? Last ten years that may be true with Iraq 2 and Libya, don't think Afghanistan is rich in oil. Go back 30 years. Kosovo, Somalia, Panama not sure. Iraq 1 yes. What ones have I missed.
by Q. » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:05 pm
by OnSong » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:09 pm
by Q. » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:29 pm
by Q. » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:41 pm
by Q. » Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:21 pm
by Q. » Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:22 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |