SA Footy

very nice answer, st

I disagree, but respect your view.

pafc, India to Australia, then distributed?

Oh, maybe 3 hours

Where art thou straight talker?!

Jobless rate falls, doh

Q. wrote:Where art thou straight talker?!

Jobless rate falls, doh

After it has risen 3 times that amount last month

Q. wrote:Where art thou straight talker?!

Jobless rate falls, doh

And what percentage are part time , casual or full time ?

If you work 1 hour a week you are classed as employed on the stats .... It's a total rort !!!

southee wrote:

Q. wrote:Where art thou straight talker?!

Jobless rate falls, doh

And what percentage are part time , casual or full time ?

If you work 1 hour a week you are classed as employed on the stats .... It's a total rort !!!

It is a rort and was introduced during Howard's reign.

I remember learning about the "Particpation Rate" in Year 12 Economics in late 80's.

That was when Hawke was PM.

Was the current definition of unemployment drawn up when Howard was Treasurer 30 odd years ago?

What a load of carp!

GWW wrote:I remember learning about the "Particpation Rate" in Year 12 Economics in late 80's.

That was when Hawke was PM.

Was the current definition of unemployment drawn up when Howard was Treasurer 30 odd years ago?

The definition of unemployment always makes me laugh when the labour force changes depending on if you are particpating or not. I thought back in year 12 Economics, much like yourself GWW but not that long ago, that it was full of crap.

Also the fact that the ABS base this on a very small % of the population.

How about we use the figures from Centrelink. How many are on Welfare...bang. How many are on the "dol" instead of say pensions. Probably not a simple as that but you get the idea. I reckon it would give a much more accurate assessment of jobs in each state.

Also we wouldnt have to deal with the not looking bullshit.

Re: will carbon tax cost Australian jobs??

Not if we all pack up and go to malasia and work for $0.60/ hour....

Dog_ger wrote:Re: will carbon tax cost Australian jobs??

Not if we all pack up and go to malasia and work for $0.60/ hour....

And thats why Australia will be in a recession within 6 months. Not because of the carbon tax.

Psyber wrote:

Quichey wrote:

"What if scientists had the same standards as pundits?"

SOME OF THEM DO!
I've posted examples of the recent furore in medical research about the manipulation of data in the pursuit of grants.
Several papers published in what are, theoretically, major, adequately peer reviewed, medical journals have since been retracted by the journals.

You can't tell me it only happens in medical research.

Spot on Psyber. There are numerous examples of "playing the game" in science, and Climatology cannot be immune. Peoples' livelihoods are involved....

This is coming from an Earth scientist..

Still shilling for the mining industry purch?

Gozu wrote:Still shilling for the mining industry purch?

Gozu..If I never existed you can take 1,200+ jobs of the employment list in SA right now.

With your politics you can take a lot more than that off the list...

Some of us like to create/discover wealth for others...it's quite rewarding...you should try it...Note: jobs in HR don't count...

Turn it up you don't create shit mate, the stuff is already in the ground.

If the Liberal's get in at the next election won't they repeal the carbon tax anyway?

Didn't the Mayans predict the carbon tax?