Is it over for Rann?

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby wycbloods » Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:10 am

Psyber wrote:
redandblack wrote:You gave me the link, Psyber, after saying I'd taken her out of context and asking if it was deliberate or not.
It wasn't out of context and it was just reporting what I'd heard.
I'd gone to the site and posted it just to confirm the spelling for you..
My comment about "out of context" was from my memory of hearing her comment about not handling the the coordination of the details of her schedule herself.
That was the context in which she had said she was "not in charge of" her destiny - you not so subtly broadened it each time you referred to it.


I quite clearly remember Isobel saying Mike Rann obviously isn't in charge of his destiny and neither am I. I think R&B has got it in the right context.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7005
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:25 am

Is not the destiny of both in "our" hands? Really is a storm in a teacup

Get onto water and mental health Mike and Issy - things that really matter
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby redandblack » Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:41 am

What is a major stuff up to some is nothing to others.
redandblack
 

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Gozu » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:48 pm

Gozu wrote:"Did Andrew Bolt do a "Channel Seven?":

"And I’m not surprised by women turning on Rann, after his treatment of Michelle Chantelois, his former lover:"

http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2 ... nel-seven/

I hope he goes after him, Bolt's got plenty of money to lose.


"Still not saying "alleged":

http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2 ... g-alleged/
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13505
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 660 times

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Psyber » Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:14 pm

Gozu wrote:
Gozu wrote:"Did Andrew Bolt do a "Channel Seven?":
"And I’m not surprised by women turning on Rann, after his treatment of Michelle Chantelois, his former lover:"
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2 ... nel-seven/
I hope he goes after him, Bolt's got plenty of money to lose.
"Still not saying "alleged":
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2 ... g-alleged/
Even my two old high school friends who are former SA Labor Ministers are not saying "alleged". Nor do they deny that she was only one of a series..
One described Rann [with a grin and a wink] as an "active member".
What they have suggested is that he should have said about Chantelois, "Hey, I was a single bloke at the time!"
Then there would have been less harm done because at least he had been honest.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12222
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 395 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby dedja » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:58 am

It's real easy to make such statements in private ... unless people put them on the public record then isn't it just hearsay?
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 20417
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 206 times
Been liked: 1024 times

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Psyber » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:20 pm

dedja wrote:It's real easy to make such statements in private ... unless people put them on the public record then isn't it just hearsay?
I agree it is easier to say things in private that you may not put on public record.
Apart from anything else you are still free to deny ever saying it to your party/business acquaintances if there is a backlash.
Putting it on public record doesn't make it more or less true, and therefore doesn't make it more or less hearsay - it just means you have to take any flack that follows.
I don't think they were lying to me or the rest of our group just saying things they believe are true but wouldn't broadcast, or say on the record.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12222
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 395 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Gozu » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:09 pm

Now this Rick Phillips character is pulling the same stunts as his ex-wife. I really don't think this clown is the full quid.

"Rick Phillips turns up at election debate":

"It's not the end because this thing started because I wanted some questions answered," he said. "I still haven't had those questions answered."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010 ... 842031.htm
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13505
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 660 times

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:16 pm

Well, that's a bugger - he came all the way in from the eastern suburbs and Rann was out there

Missed him by that much

Image
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:17 pm

Memo to self: If you are going to play up on Mrs 041, stay well clear of MC.......
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:29 pm

Rick Phillips speaks on Mike Rann, Michelle Chantelois
Daniel Wills, Political Reporter
From: AdelaideNow March 10, 2010 4:32PM

MICHELLE Chantelois' estranged husband has appeared at a pre-election debate and declared his campaign to "expose" Premier Mike Rann will end on March 20.

Rick Phillips has pleaded guilty to assaulting Mr Rann with a rolled-up magazine in October and said his actions had been motivated by concerns the Premier's relationship with his wife had destabilised their family.

Ms Chantelois, a former Parliament House barmaid, has publicly said that she had a sexual affair with Mr Rann. He has repeatedly denied this, although he has acknowledged the two had a friendship "before I was married" and publicly apologised for any distress it had caused to her or her family.

Mr Phillips appeared at an SA Press Club debate between Treasurer Kevin Foley and Opposition treasury spokesman Steven Griffiths at the invitation of a neighbour.

He said his seating on a table with Liberal MP Ivan Venning was coincidental.

Mr Phillips sat quietly during the hour-long debate and told reporters afterwards that he wanted Mr Rann and his government voted out of office.

"They're just arrogant, arrogant, arrogant," he said.

"I've done my bit to expose what this man is about."

"It makes it a personal issue to slap the guy who destroyed my family, philosophically."

Mr Phillips said he was not satisfied with the Premier's response to Ms Chantelois' allegations.

"It's not the end. This thing started because I wanted some questions answered. I still haven't had those questions answered," he said.

"I'm here to say something, to do my bit.

"She's lovely, she's intelligent, she's been very courageous and brave to come up and stand up against the media machine, but is she smart enough to beat a lie detector test? Give me a break." (After Mr Rann said Ms Chantelois' allegations were untrue, she chose to take a lie detector test and gave the Premier results that had indicated she was telling the truth).

Mr Phillips also said he would turn his back on the Labor Party, despite years of union membership, over the Premier's alleged conduct.

He said the public was growing tired of the scandal and he would do nothing to further it after the state election.

"It'll end for me on the 20th of March. We in South Australia get what we deserve if we re-elect him," he said.

"We've all had enough of it, but I think we all want fresh faces everywhere.

"I don't want my face on TV. I don't think we want Rann and Foley's faces on TV any more. I think we're done with them, we're done with Michelle, we're done with me."

Mr Phillips also rejected Mr Rann's apology during the great debate as political spin.

"His apology to me and my family, which I do not accept, the only thing in that apology was: `Before I was married, before I was married, he said that twice.

"What does that mean? Does that mean `I can do what I like?"'

Mr Phillips also denied his presence was intended to be provocative or disrupt the event.

The Premier's office has told AdelaideNow that Mr Rann has no comment to make on Mr Phillips' statements.


Well, there you go. Its been a Labor Party plot from the beginning - trying to get a sympathy vote for Mike. So not only does "Mr Lonely" come out, "Poor Me Mike" has a shot as well.

Or after the dodgy e-mail affair brought down MHS, they were hoping this little trick would hurt the opposition

Will this Government stop at nothing to get re-elected?
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Gozu » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:34 pm

You're taking this lunatics word for anything Jimmy?

He's just a typical Burnside feral ;)
Last edited by Gozu on Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13505
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 660 times

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:35 pm

Nah - just having some fun
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Gozu » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:23 pm

Just saw an ad for this website during the Ten News http://redmondfacts.com.au/

Good to see Redmond and the Libs put up a site like this to help explain their views to the public ;)
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13505
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 660 times

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby southee » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:32 pm

I thought this was over.....Sasha came out and said it was in the Sunday Mail last week. :roll:
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4937
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 861 times
Been liked: 123 times

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Psyber » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:49 pm

Gozu wrote:Just saw an ad for this website during the Ten News http://redmondfacts.com.au/
Good to see Redmond and the Libs put up a site like this to help explain their views to the public ;)

A valiant attempt to change the focus of the debate by Rann's mates. :lol:
They've made her voice sound a bit odd too - I don't know whether the quotes are accurate.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12222
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 395 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:52 pm

The ecstacy one was taken out of context and redmond clarified it in the great debate

It will be seen for what it is - misrepresentation, sorry, I mean a classic Rann tactic
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Blue Boy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:42 pm

I will vote labor anyways but i rekon all the stunts by michelle and rick and there help from the media will see liberal win !!!!

I love Adelaide my home town but I can see many following what is popular !!!

I might just turn up at all political functions just because i need to expose some one and see if the media come and talk to me :shock: ;)
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:00 pm

Take a bird wearing your avatar and I reckon you'll make the papers mate
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Is it over for Rann?

Postby shoe boy » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:12 pm

(-| wake me up when this is over.
User avatar
shoe boy
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4534
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:58 pm
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 209 times

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |