SA Footy

I'm surprised this topic didn't pop up earlier.

Very disappointing that Turnbull won the Liberal leadership. I was looking forward to another couple of years of incompetence from the opposition.

At the time he called the spill I thought it was a good move by Nelson because it would look a tad hasty for a leadership change. If he left it any longer he had no hope. Even the traditional liberal savers such as evil refugee invasion or a terrorist attack wouldn't have worked now that they are in opposition.

Does Brendan now join Psyber's mate as the only libs not to have taken the party to an election? What an exclusive club!

John Hewson Shrek?

Lost the unloseable election.

Bill Snedden and Andrew Peacock would be others too.

I'm glad it happened. Let's hope the Liberals get their act together. An incompetent opposition does nothing for the state of Australian Democracy (see Howard years).

Nelson really rooted up the apology to the indigenous. He never recovered from there.

There was a related thread and poll earlier viewtopic.php?f=20&t=12084 but it didn't excite anybody.
I voted "6-12 months" in the Poll.

I met Brendan Nelson a few times back when he was AMA President. I thought he was pretty unexciting then too.
He got the job the same way Alexander D did - there was a stand off and a neutral compromise candidate was put up.
Peter Costello deciding not to stand opened the door for Malcolm Turnbull who was the other obvious option.

It will be interesting to see how it goes..

Psyber wrote:There was a related thread and poll earlier http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=12084 but it didn't excite anybody.
I voted "6-12 months" in the Poll.

I met Brendan Nelson a few times back when he was AMA President. I thought he was pretty unexciting then too.
He got the job the same way Alexander D did - there was a stand off and a neutral compromise candidate was put up.
Peter Costello deciding not to stand opened the door for Malcolm Turnbull who was the other obvious option.

It will be interesting to see how it goes..

not syre who the libs would have been better of as leader. nelson is as you say pretty unexciting and im not sure australia is going to vote for an rich elitist like turnbull.

best on hill wrote:

Psyber wrote:There was a related thread and poll earlier viewtopic.php?f=20&t=12084 but it didn't excite anybody.
I voted "6-12 months" in the Poll.

I met Brendan Nelson a few times back when he was AMA President. I thought he was pretty unexciting then too.
He got the job the same way Alexander D did - there was a stand off and a neutral compromise candidate was put up.
Peter Costello deciding not to stand opened the door for Malcolm Turnbull who was the other obvious option.

It will be interesting to see how it goes..

not syre who the libs would have been better of as leader. nelson is as you say pretty unexciting and im not sure australia is going to vote for an rich elitist like turnbull.

Let's see.
If I remember correctly, his father was a sole parent and not wealthy, and he's a self-made millionaire - not born to it.
A lot of people may be able to relate to that, and recognise it as a measure of ability.
There is also some suggestion Rudd is more wealthy than Turnbull, though his wife made much of it, not him.