by The Big Shrek » Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:04 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:29 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:The next state election will be the first time I vote Libs infront of Labour. The ALP exists in name only and not in spirit in SA. Foley is a pig, Rann not far behind. Off you go boys.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by The Big Shrek » Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:13 pm
by Sojourner » Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:10 am
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:43 am
by Psyber » Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:31 am
I strongly agree with you Sojourner.Sojourner wrote:The problem in TBS that people in general are not to worried about "Prisioner Rights" enabling governments to "treat them like Mushrooms".
What should be of concern is that the Remand Centre is completley full and people on remand who havent even remotely been proven guilty are being sent to maximum security wings at Yatala and getting minimal excersize through the day as the staff are not given the time to supervise it. Bad luck if someone actually proves to be innocent and is put through all of that!
I can understand the State Goverment saying that the new Jail will sort out the issues, yet it still has not been started yet and something has to be done now to ease the current situation.
We clearly need to build a new remand centre with expanded capacity irrespective of what happens with the new Jail at Murray Bridge, so the Goverment ought to be getting onto it or organising extensions to the current one. I also dont see why they have not organised the lease on the Baxter Detention Centre to run until the new jail is opened enableing the additional prisioners to be placed there in the meantime?
My last point is that I feel that enough resources should be allocated to prisions to make sure that Reading and Writing is compulsory for those that cannot read or write. Studies have shown in Britian that Re-Offending drops dramatically when illiterate criminals are taught to read and write and can actually function in society without having to rely on their criminal mates to help them out! - How many of the "Gang of 49" can Read and Write? I am guessing probably not to many, making it compulsory instantly then breaks the power of the leadership of the gang over its younger illiterate members and it would be the single most quickest way of solving the problem!
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:53 am
by mick » Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:56 am
by Psyber » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:01 pm
Yes, I knew Ken fairly well. We were on a committee together in the mid 1990s. We were a bit far apart politically, as he is well to the left.The Big Shrek wrote:Psyber have you come across Dr Ken O'Brien in your time. He's given a couple of lectures at Uni during Sentencing and Criminology courses. Great lectures both times.
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:02 pm
mick wrote:If we were to introduce islamic law prisons could become largely redundant, removal of limbs for less serious crime makes it more difficult to be a thief or be violent, removal of the head means those guilty of very serious crimes will not reoffendActually TBS after your rant Mr Foley has gone up in my estimation
seriously it is wrong that people on remand should be placed in the main prison system, but as far as those convicted of serious crimes "rack and stack em"
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:04 pm
Psyber wrote:Yes, I knew Ken fairly well. We were on a committee together in the mid 1990s. We were a bit far apart politically, as he is well to the left.The Big Shrek wrote:Psyber have you come across Dr Ken O'Brien in your time. He's given a couple of lectures at Uni during Sentencing and Criminology courses. Great lectures both times.
I also knew Andy Czechowicz who chaired ANZAPPL [Aust & NZ Assoc'n for Psychiatry, Psychology, and the Law.]
by Psyber » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:17 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Psyber wrote:Yes, I knew Ken fairly well. We were on a committee together in the mid 1990s. We were a bit far apart politically, as he is well to the left.The Big Shrek wrote:Psyber have you come across Dr Ken O'Brien in your time. He's given a couple of lectures at Uni during Sentencing and Criminology courses. Great lectures both times.
I also knew Andy Czechowicz who chaired ANZAPPL [Aust & NZ Assoc'n for Psychiatry, Psychology, and the Law.]
Ha ha. Is there anyone not to the left of you? At least your right wing views are educated unlike Foley.
by GWW » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:36 pm
by mick » Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:55 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:mick wrote:If we were to introduce islamic law prisons could become largely redundant, removal of limbs for less serious crime makes it more difficult to be a thief or be violent, removal of the head means those guilty of very serious crimes will not reoffendActually TBS after your rant Mr Foley has gone up in my estimation
seriously it is wrong that people on remand should be placed in the main prison system, but as far as those convicted of serious crimes "rack and stack em"
Well I know people like you don't respnd well to arguments about human dignity, but what about increased recidivism due to prison conditions?
by JK » Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:59 pm
Don't know that I (personally) agree with thatThe Big Shrek wrote:All people deserve dignity though.
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:32 am
by Psyber » Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:19 am
I would have thought it was a last resort, but necessary to keep the public safe from those who are beyond rehabilitation or retraining after it has been given an adequate trial, and safe from the relatively few true sociopaths, of whom I have met a few...The Big Shrek wrote:I'd be interested to find out what people believe the purpose of incarceration is.
By the way, back to Foley being a pig. Good to see the govt. offering a pay rise above that's not less than inflation this time. Still not good enough though.
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:29 pm
by mick » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:48 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:If protection from these people were the purpose, why do we lock up people who have committed mercy killings? What about someone who killed another driving recklessly, presumably taking away their licence would suffice? Shouldn't sentence's be indeterminant then and release based upon rehabilitation?
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:54 pm
mick wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:If protection from these people were the purpose, why do we lock up people who have committed mercy killings? What about someone who killed another driving recklessly, presumably taking away their licence would suffice? Shouldn't sentence's be indeterminate then and release based upon rehabilitation?
What about revenge? society believes in revenge - hence as you say why not just take away their licence? Just imagine if someone close to you or someone you loved was killed by a crimininally reckless driver, would you be happy with them just losing their licence? As far as incarceration is concerned I believe in lieu of execution that violent career criminals and sociopaths should be kept permanently out of society in the prison system. However, I don't believe all murderers should get life as many are basically decent people who have made a bad decision when angry or provoked, however, I think society and the vistims family deserve their pound of flesh.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |