Which party has "the right" to govern?

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Which party has "the right" to govern

Poll ended at Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:05 pm

Greens
1
3%
Labor
9
26%
Liberal
12
35%
None of the above
12
35%
 
Total votes : 34

Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Sojourner » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:05 pm

Irrespective of which party gets to govern the nation, which party has the right - mandate to do so from the electorate?
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Dogwatcher » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:07 pm

Some think they're born to rule.
But at this point, none have the right.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby redandblack » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:07 pm

Neither.
redandblack
 

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Psyber » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:12 pm

redandblack wrote:Neither.
R&B and I are having an agreeable day today.
Nobody has the right to govern until they can drum up the numbers to form a functional coalition [note the small "c"].
We need a "Neither" option in this poll.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby mick » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:14 pm

Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option? :shock:
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby redandblack » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:16 pm

Perhaps because there's a party which wins several seats with only 4% of the vote.
redandblack
 

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby redandblack » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:18 pm

Psyber wrote:
redandblack wrote:Neither.
R&B and I are having an agreeable day today.
Nobody has the right to govern until they can drum up the numbers to form a functional coalition [note the small "c"].
We need a "Neither" option in this poll.


Once again we agree, Psyber ;)

Done.
redandblack
 

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Sojourner » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:18 pm

mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option? :shock:


Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby redden whites » Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:31 pm

For me whoever has the most lower house seats should in minority. I thought the Abbott speech instantly declaring Labor lost it's legitmacy to govern(due to the fact it could no way from it's own majority ) on Saturday night was an insult to every voter the nation. The fact that the Libs were in the same position surely meant a level-headed speech with some dignity was appropriate.
Latest predictions seeem to be 73-73 , Ind 3 , Gr1
If the Libs sneak ahead by 1 I have no problem with them forming goverment and believe they should.
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby fisho mcspaz » Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Sojourner wrote:
mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option? :shock:


Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?


Bob Brown. :supz:
Hey Goose, ya big stud! Take me to bed or lose me for ever.
User avatar
fisho mcspaz
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3042
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: Happy Valley
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 111 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Ronnie » Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:49 pm

fisho mcspaz wrote:
Sojourner wrote:
mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option? :shock:


Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?


Bob Brown. :supz:


if that happens it might be finally time that some of the more whackier policies of the Greens are given a bit more media attention.
You could start with free gender reassignment surgery or heroin on prescription.
Their economic policies amount to taxing the buggery out of anything and anyone who is remotely seen as being a productive contributor to society.


Tony or Julia I can handle, Bob and his mates i'm horrified of!
Ronnie
Reserves
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby mick » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:21 pm

I have no time for the greens, however, I think nothing has been achieved by the prohibition of illegal drugs. I think registered addicts getting free pharmaceutical grade heroin would go a long way to lessening the number of robberies and burglaries. It would also end a lucrative income stream for many criminals. I also agree with their position on same sex marriage as I believe that they should not be treated any differently than straight people, why should they(gays) miss out on the suffering ? ;) That's about as far as it goes because in other areas they are hell bent on taking us backwards. I would have preferred a clear ALP victory than seeing this mob have any influence on the direction of the nation
Last edited by mick on Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Leaping Lindner » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:23 pm

Ronnie wrote:
fisho mcspaz wrote:
Sojourner wrote:
mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option? :shock:


Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?


Bob Brown. :supz:


if that happens it might be finally time that some of the more whackier policies of the Greens are given a bit more media attention.
You could start with free gender reassignment surgery or heroin on prescription.
Their economic policies amount to taxing the buggery out of anything and anyone who is remotely seen as being a productive contributor to society.


Tony or Julia I can handle, Bob and his mates i'm horrified of!


I worked in drug and alcohol rehab for 6 years and this makes complete sense. And it's not just me that thinks that. The doctors I worked for all did as did many pharmacists I dealt with. But their opinions were based on medical knowledge and not trying to appease Mr and Mrs Average in greater western sydney or the Gold Coast growth corridor. ;)
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby bulldogproud2 » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:25 pm

redden whites wrote:For me whoever has the most lower house seats should in minority. I thought the Abbott speech instantly declaring Labor lost it's legitmacy to govern(due to the fact it could no way from it's own majority ) on Saturday night was an insult to every voter the nation. The fact that the Libs were in the same position surely meant a level-headed speech with some dignity was appropriate.
Latest predictions seeem to be 73-73 , Ind 3 , Gr1
If the Libs sneak ahead by 1 I have no problem with them forming goverment and believe they should.


I would nearly agree with this but I think you are including the WA National as a member of the Coalition. He is independent of the Coalition and should not be grouped together with them.
Whichever party wins the most seats out of Labor and the Coalition should have the first right to form government.
I agree that Tony's speech was woeful and insulting. He showed disrespect for the people of Australia and for the Australian electoral system. We have a preferential system in Australia, not a first-past-the-post system. He was plain wrong in stating that more people voted for the Coalition. On latest figures, approximately 150 000 have preferenced Labor ahead of the Coalition.
bulldogproud2
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:24 pm
Location: West Beach or Henley Oval
Has liked: 52 times
Been liked: 51 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Psyber » Mon Aug 23, 2010 7:33 pm

I agree that Tony Abbot should have been more restrained in his first comments as Julia Gillard was - it was less level headed and dignified than hers. Perhaps the fatigue finally got him.
However, he was correct that the Coalition got more first preferences than the ALP - though it doesn't mean much without the seats in hand.
First preferences, or two-party preferred votes, are meaningless - it is getting the seat numbers together that counts.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby redandblack » Mon Aug 23, 2010 7:47 pm

The seats are most important.

Two party preferred is next.

Primary vote is a long, long last.
redandblack
 

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Media Park » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:02 pm

fisho mcspaz wrote:
Sojourner wrote:
mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option? :shock:


Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?


Bob Brown. :supz:


A Gillard led Government will not last.
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
User avatar
Media Park
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13864
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby fisho mcspaz » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:06 pm

Media Park wrote:
fisho mcspaz wrote:
Sojourner wrote:
mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option? :shock:


Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?


Bob Brown. :supz:


A Gillard led Government will not last.


I think it might, if it's a minority government. Labor + Greens will be very formidable.
Hey Goose, ya big stud! Take me to bed or lose me for ever.
User avatar
fisho mcspaz
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3042
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: Happy Valley
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 111 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Media Park » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:11 pm

I'm thinking either the Coalition forms a minority Government, or we are voting again- which I do not understand!

If the same number of people vote as did on Saturday, with the same candidates running, would people really change their votes? what would it achieve? wouldn't it be the same result?
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
User avatar
Media Park
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13864
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Which party has "the right" to govern?

Postby Hondo » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:35 pm

Media Park wrote:I'm thinking either the Coalition forms a minority Government, or we are voting again- which I do not understand!

If the same number of people vote as did on Saturday, with the same candidates running, would people really change their votes? what would it achieve? wouldn't it be the same result?


I have wondered that too but I think that if people realise how close it is and how important their vote actually was then there would be a drop in protest votes and informal votes. Also last minute undecided voters may go differently with more time to think about it. It's one thing to be a labor voter who wants to give the party a rocket and another when your protest vote actually gets the Liberals in when you thought they were no chance (as an example of a protest vote changing).

I reckon you'd get a clear majority if they did it again which is why the independents would prefer to work out a minority govenment and retain their current powerful positions (this insight is borrowed from someone on the ABC yesterday).
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Next

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |