by Sojourner » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:05 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:07 pm
by Psyber » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:12 pm
R&B and I are having an agreeable day today.redandblack wrote:Neither.
by mick » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:14 pm
by redandblack » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:16 pm
by redandblack » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:18 pm
Psyber wrote:R&B and I are having an agreeable day today.redandblack wrote:Neither.
Nobody has the right to govern until they can drum up the numbers to form a functional coalition [note the small "c"].
We need a "Neither" option in this poll.
by Sojourner » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:18 pm
mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option?
by redden whites » Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:31 pm
by fisho mcspaz » Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:52 pm
Sojourner wrote:mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option?
Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?
by Ronnie » Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:49 pm
fisho mcspaz wrote:Sojourner wrote:mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option?
Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?
Bob Brown.
by mick » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:21 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:23 pm
Ronnie wrote:fisho mcspaz wrote:Sojourner wrote:mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option?
Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?
Bob Brown.
if that happens it might be finally time that some of the more whackier policies of the Greens are given a bit more media attention.
You could start with free gender reassignment surgery or heroin on prescription.
Their economic policies amount to taxing the buggery out of anything and anyone who is remotely seen as being a productive contributor to society.
Tony or Julia I can handle, Bob and his mates i'm horrified of!
by bulldogproud2 » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:25 pm
redden whites wrote:For me whoever has the most lower house seats should in minority. I thought the Abbott speech instantly declaring Labor lost it's legitmacy to govern(due to the fact it could no way from it's own majority ) on Saturday night was an insult to every voter the nation. The fact that the Libs were in the same position surely meant a level-headed speech with some dignity was appropriate.
Latest predictions seeem to be 73-73 , Ind 3 , Gr1
If the Libs sneak ahead by 1 I have no problem with them forming goverment and believe they should.
by Psyber » Mon Aug 23, 2010 7:33 pm
by redandblack » Mon Aug 23, 2010 7:47 pm
by Media Park » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:02 pm
fisho mcspaz wrote:Sojourner wrote:mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option?
Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?
Bob Brown.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by fisho mcspaz » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:06 pm
Media Park wrote:fisho mcspaz wrote:Sojourner wrote:mick wrote:Why is a party that only polled 14% being offered as an option?
Who will have more power in a new Gillard led Government - Julia Gillard or Bob Brown?
Bob Brown.
A Gillard led Government will not last.
by Media Park » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:11 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Hondo » Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:35 pm
Media Park wrote:I'm thinking either the Coalition forms a minority Government, or we are voting again- which I do not understand!
If the same number of people vote as did on Saturday, with the same candidates running, would people really change their votes? what would it achieve? wouldn't it be the same result?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |