Federal Government proposes a price on carbon.

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: Federal Government proposes a price on carbon.

Postby Bully » Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:18 pm

Where is Fish?? :D

his carbon tax is going to be finally put to bed ;)
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: Federal Government proposes a price on carbon.

Postby Psyber » Sat Jun 28, 2014 4:11 pm

I read it too. It reminded me of religious debate rather than science.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12212
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 389 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Federal Government proposes a price on carbon.

Postby Bully » Sat Jun 28, 2014 4:37 pm

just find it funny how since labor were put out on their arses that fish hasn't been seen in the politics thread since :lol:
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: Federal Government proposes a price on carbon.

Postby Q. » Sat Jun 28, 2014 11:55 pm

Bully wrote:just find it funny how since labor were put out on their arses that fish hasn't been seen in the politics thread since :lol:


He really should be here to witness the comedy we're currently seeing ... Canadia
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Federal Government proposes a price on carbon.

Postby zedman » Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:51 am

Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Even when 97% of climate scientists are saying it is so? But wait, of course, they are conditioned to think that way aren't they!


“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.

Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.”

― Michael Crichton January 2003
zedman
Coach
 
Posts: 6456
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:48 pm
Has liked: 1077 times
Been liked: 387 times

Re: Federal Government proposes a price on carbon.

Postby bennymacca » Thu Jul 03, 2014 5:33 pm

also requires evidence though.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Previous

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |