Wingnuts and Loonies

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby redandblack » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:23 am

Laurie Oakes today.

Pretty much as I've been saying.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/edi ... 6016151079

Note the part about John Howard proposing the same carbon tax, but bigger.
redandblack
 

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Psyber » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:33 am

However, Julia did make a clear promise that it wouldn't happen under her government if elected.
I think such blatant deception of the electorate should not be glossed over.
The argument that it "had to happen", so it is OK is like saying, "It doesn't count - we had our fingers crossed!"
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby smac » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:43 am

I'm wondering what changed - it's OK to say circumstances have changed, I just haven't seen any offering from the Govt to indicate what it is.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby redandblack » Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:48 am

Yes, she did say that and has to wear fair criticism for it.

To say, though, that she is the first PM to do that is surely nonsense.

Much is made of John Howard's 'never, ever' statement. Somehow that is excused because he subsequently took it to an election. To me, though, I'd interpret 'never, ever' as meaning....ummm, ...'never, ever'?

I also note the lack of any comparison on here about Howard lying about asylum seekers throwing their children overboard, or perhaps committing us to a war on the basis that we had to stop Saddam Hussein's 'weapons of mass destruction'. No, the greatest betrayal of the people is suddenly Julia Gillard bringing in a carbon tax.

Fair question about what has changed, smac.

What has changed is politics. The numbers are not there to govern in her own right. It's a coalition and the numbers are there now.

I recall Tony Abbott offering Wilkie and Windsor 'whatever they wanted' to gain power. I recall Abbott agreeing to nearly all the demands of Bob Katter, for goodness sake, so no-one can suggest it would have been any different if Abbott had won the election.

Gillard said she wouldn't bring in a carbon tax and now she's doing so. She'll be judged at the next election on that and many other things.
redandblack
 

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby smac » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:06 pm

I'm not disagreeing with anything you say and to be honest try not to dwell too much on the past. The GST has been in for over a decade now, I've long moved on from that one and all the other broken promises and certainly expect to see many more before my time is up.

I wish all politicians and political commentators (whether they be professional or amateur) would just focus on what is happening now and make efforts to hold the current Govt accountable for what they say and do without smoke and mirrors.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby redandblack » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:10 pm

Yes, I agree, the mistakes of the past don't excuse today's mistakes.

I think government is much harder now. Whatever is done, half those with an opinion are going to think it's terrible, regardless.
redandblack
 

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby smac » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:27 pm

Yes, that's certainly the case. It's one thing to hold Govt accountable, another completely to be obstructing/dissenting for the sake of it.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Q. » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:51 pm

Psyber wrote:However, Julia did make a clear promise that it wouldn't happen under her government if elected.
I think such blatant deception of the electorate should not be glossed over.
The argument that it "had to happen", so it is OK is like saying, "It doesn't count - we had our fingers crossed!"


Given that Labor weren't actually elected into Government, the 'broken promise' shouldn't even be an issue.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Media Park » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:16 pm

One question re this...

I accept that it may have happened under a Coalition Govt, but did TA ever rule it out categorically, like JG did?
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
User avatar
Media Park
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13864
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby dedja » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:19 pm

Psyber wrote:However, Julia did make a clear promise that it wouldn't happen under her government if elected.
I think such blatant deception of the electorate should not be glossed over.
The argument that it "had to happen", so it is OK is like saying, "It doesn't count - we had our fingers crossed!"


You mean, like a non-core promise? ;)
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja … my yes be yes, my no be no
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24401
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 794 times
Been liked: 1702 times

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Psyber » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:45 am

dedja wrote:
Psyber wrote:However, Julia did make a clear promise that it wouldn't happen under her government if elected.
I think such blatant deception of the electorate should not be glossed over.
The argument that it "had to happen", so it is OK is like saying, "It doesn't count - we had our fingers crossed!"
You mean, like a non-core promise? ;)
Point taken mate, but this is a big one - actually either lying the night before an election, or breaking a major promise, over an issue that could have been a key to the result.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby redandblack » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:50 am

John Howard lied about 'children overboard' just before an election.

John Howard lied about the biggest issue the country can have - going to war.

Our search for the non-existent 'weapons of mass destruction' cost untold thousands their lives.

I doubt this is in the same league, but it's certainly being treated as such.
redandblack
 

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Q. » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:17 pm

As I stated above, ALP weren't elected into Government so the 'broken promise' hysteria is redundant.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Psyber » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:43 pm

Quichey wrote:As I stated above, ALP weren't elected into Government so the 'broken promise' hysteria is redundant.
That's a weak excuse - they formed a government after making that promise - the promise should have been non-negotiable.
However, that may be rectified - Tony Windsor is obviously not entirely happy. ;)
[And yes I would have been just as critical of Tony Abbott had it been him.]
Last edited by Psyber on Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Q. » Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:36 pm

It's not an attempt at an excuse. It's the result of a hung parliament.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Bat Pad » Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:18 pm

Quichey wrote:It's not an attempt at an excuse. It's the result of a hung parliament.


So you find it acceptable to introduce policy which goes against their own beliefs just so they can remain in power?
Bat Pad
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:03 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Q. » Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:42 pm

Bat Pad wrote:
Quichey wrote:It's not an attempt at an excuse. It's the result of a hung parliament.


So you find it acceptable to introduce policy which goes against their own beliefs just so they can remain in power?


The post-election negotiations involved compromise from both major parties. Personally, I'm glad that compromise has resulted in direct action on climate change and I'm happy that the denialists are having to suspend their beliefs.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Bat Pad » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:06 pm

Quichey wrote:
Bat Pad wrote:
Quichey wrote:It's not an attempt at an excuse. It's the result of a hung parliament.


So you find it acceptable to introduce policy which goes against their own beliefs just so they can remain in power?


The post-election negotiations involved compromise from both major parties. Personally, I'm glad that compromise has resulted in direct action on climate change and I'm happy that the denialists are having to suspend their beliefs.


So you are glad she negotiated away her own beliefs (that there should not be a carbon tax) for power. You are fine to be happy with that if you feel that strongly about a carbon tax. She obviously didn't feel that strongly on the issue however, I mean, I have no doubt you have strong views in favour of multiculturalism.

Would you negotiate to re-introduce The White Australia Policy for power with One Nation if they were holding the balance of power?

Her lack of conviction on the issue says to me that if she can negotiate this issue in to hold onto power, she can just as easily neogtiate it away should the need arise.
Bat Pad
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:03 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Q. » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:52 pm

Would I be a politician?

A shift in voting away from the major parties was largely due to neither of them being willing to accept or act upon climate change, so the post election negotiations would inevitably involve negotiating a position on climate change policy.

I don't for a second believe there is much integrity in Australian politics (events in the last decade or two have eroded any shreds of faith), so I would not be surprised at a backflip. The only thing preventing a backflip is electoral annihilation.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Wingnuts and Loonies

Postby Psyber » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:48 pm

Quichey wrote:Would I be a politician?
A shift in voting away from the major parties was largely due to neither of them being willing to accept or act upon climate change, so the post election negotiations would inevitably involve negotiating a position on climate change policy.
I don't for a second believe there is much integrity in Australian politics (events in the last decade or two have eroded any shreds of faith), so I would not be surprised at a backflip. The only thing preventing a backflip is electoral annihilation.
The strength of protest against the ALP since the carbon tax announcement raises questions about that assumption.
I suspect it was more because the voters were disillusioned with both major parties and both leaders, and the Democrats had done themselves in and were no longer there as a protest party.
No doubt there was also some general sympathy towards Green concepts, but that does not translate into a mandate for the implementation of the Greens policies.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Next

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |