Page 1 of 1

RAH - costs

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:02 am
by White Line Fever
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 6070057216

only 400million more :roll:

Anyone is construction knows the cost of hospitals.
If the Desal is 2billion the hospital will be 5billion

this is bad news they are still hiding real costs.

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:03 am
by Johno6
it was always going to be over costs no matter who did it... just depended by how much.

health system should be one f our top priorities.... and my GF works at the RAH
so more jobs means work for her haha

Re: Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:16 am
by heater31
White Line Fever wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/full-royal-adelaide-hospital-cost-to-be-revealed/story-e6frea83-1226070057216

only 400million more :roll:

Anyone is construction knows the cost of hospitals.
If the Desal is 2billion the hospital will be 5billion

this is bad news they are still hiding real costs.


You complain about the costing for this yet you are all for Adelaide Oval :roll:

The cost blow out that they ate telling us now will probably not the last either...m

Re: Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:35 am
by White Line Fever
heater31 wrote:
White Line Fever wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/full-royal-adelaide-hospital-cost-to-be-revealed/story-e6frea83-1226070057216

only 400million more :roll:

Anyone is construction knows the cost of hospitals.
If the Desal is 2billion the hospital will be 5billion

this is bad news they are still hiding real costs.


You complain about the costing for this yet you are all for Adelaide Oval :roll:

The cost blow out that they ate telling us now will probably not the last either...m


I'm not complaining about cost but about them not being truthful about it.
I hope it costs more.. more work for me.
I want it to go ahead, like the oval, but a difference of 3 billion is abit difference to 200million because of an oval

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:24 pm
by southee
Image

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:28 pm
by fish
LOL :lol:

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:02 am
by woodublieve12
work at the rah... the new hospital has to happen.... refurbishing the current site would be a waste of time, you just have to look under neath it... or walk through a ward. only so far paint and plaster will go

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:09 am
by Johno6
i thought they had to give the old land back to the aboriginals or something similar also?
i could be wrong tho

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:29 am
by Footy Smart
Johno6 wrote:i thought they had to give the old land back to the aboriginals or something similar also?
i could be wrong tho



The Building that was built in the 60/70s will be returned to the botanical gardens/parklands! The Heritage buildings will most probably be used by the Universities and or SA Health.

To see the Hospital as just a new Hospital nothing will change etc is incorrect. The whole health system is improved by this facility being built.

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:16 pm
by dedja
*cough* Adelaide Uni *cough*

Re: RAH - costs

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:00 pm
by bulldogproud2
Footy Smart wrote:
Johno6 wrote:i thought they had to give the old land back to the aboriginals or something similar also?
i could be wrong tho



The Building that was built in the 60/70s will be returned to the botanical gardens/parklands! The Heritage buildings will most probably be used by the Universities and or SA Health.

To see the Hospital as just a new Hospital nothing will change etc is incorrect. The whole health system is improved by this facility being built.



Have spoken to a number of current employees of the RAH. All are very much looking forward to the new hospital - a huge step forward.