SA Footy

what do people think about dodgy mr thomsons actions and gillards responses??

Interesting, of all the publications I thought that the Left Leaning "The Punch" had a pretty good article in today which sums up a few thoughts!

http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/in- ... g-thomson/

My thoughts....

Mr.Thompson - dodgy as hell. Needs to come clean and raise his hand.....but Im sure I will be shot down by the faithful Labor posters on here as I dont have the EVIDENCE.

Unfortunately Labor folk...there is evidence!!!!! ...and you know it!!!

Gillard's response - Weak as water.....usual robotic throw away lines that typify Labor as spineless and gutless.

straight talker wrote:what do people think about dodgy mr thomsons actions and gillards responses??

perhaps reserve comment until after the lynch mob has found the evidence

if he is guilty then post away
if he is innocent then hes reputation has already been tarnished by a smear campaign

best on hill wrote:

straight talker wrote:what do people think about dodgy mr thomsons actions and gillards responses??

perhaps reserve comment until after the lynch mob has found the evidence

if he is guilty then post away
if he is innocent then hes reputation has already been tarnished by a smear campaign

Are you for real boh?? UNTIL they find the evidence!! how much more do you want????

so with your logic Mary Jo Fisher is guilty as hell then ...

dedja wrote:so with your logic Mary Jo Fisher is guilty as hell then ...

no she is from the other side of politics just right that off as a miss understanding

dedja wrote:so with your logic Mary Jo Fisher is guilty as hell then ...

well i believe she is to go before a court of law? I cant think of reading or seeing anywhere that the libs are trying to avoid the fact that she maybe guilty? Unlike gillard and the labor part trying to avoid everything about thomson!?

no, you're right ...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/leader-de ... 6124060918

dedja wrote:no, you're right ...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/leader-de ... 6124060918

is that the best article you could find?? Cant see anything in that article where abbott has said that she is not guilty or she shouldnt be going to court. In fact i see that he clearly says she will have her day in court dont you see that too?? I think the thomson affair maybe be just a LITTLE BIT on the higher scale of poor acts than jo fisher wouldnt you? She maybe has done one poor thing but i think you and i both know thru all parts of media reports with proof that thomson is a dodgy labor thug!

Q.E.D.

dedja wrote:Q.E.D.

dont understand that stig is that out of gillards spin book?

sorry, I forgot you're not edumacated ...

quod erat demonstrandum

WTF????

straight talker wrote:

dedja wrote:no, you're right ...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/leader-de ... 6124060918

is that the best article you could find?? Cant see anything in that article where abbott has said that she is not guilty or she shouldnt be going to court. In fact i see that he clearly says she will have her day in court dont you see that too?? I think the thomson affair maybe be just a LITTLE BIT on the higher scale of poor acts than jo fisher wouldnt you? She maybe has done one poor thing but i think you and i both know thru all parts of media reports with proof that thomson is a dodgy labor thug!

so she is accused of theft and then her defense she has mental health issues. mmmm what kind of people do the liberal party attract

best on hill wrote:

straight talker wrote:

dedja wrote:no, you're right ...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/leader-de ... 6124060918

is that the best article you could find?? Cant see anything in that article where abbott has said that she is not guilty or she shouldnt be going to court. In fact i see that he clearly says she will have her day in court dont you see that too?? I think the thomson affair maybe be just a LITTLE BIT on the higher scale of poor acts than jo fisher wouldnt you? She maybe has done one poor thing but i think you and i both know thru all parts of media reports with proof that thomson is a dodgy labor thug!

so she is accused of theft and then her defense is she is a nutter. mmmm what kind of people do the liberal party attract

Have you proof that says her defense is that she is a nutter? I have not seen that anywhere that says that her defense is going to be that? What is thomsons excuse ?? That he is a sex nympho and a thief?? And gillards problems with her memory what is her problem? Cant remember certain phone calls etc:?? cmon get real.......

Sojourner wrote:WTF????

LOL - just as well the photoshoppers put the two ladies in those spots, and not the other way around.

Squawk wrote:

Sojourner wrote:WTF????

LOL - just as well the photoshoppers put the two ladies in those spots, and not the other way around.

whats all that mean squak?

Best on Hill and Straight Talker - personally I'd prefer it if people avoided describing people with mental health problems as being nutters". A tad insensitive and outdated IMHO."Go and have a look at the beyondblue website sometime.

FWIW - Andrew Robb and Tony Abbott have both said MJF has been experiencing mental health problems and that this will be raised in her defence in court.

Thompson's defence, FWIW, relies on his assertion that the misuse of the credit card was by another person who he has not named.

While the two matters have some parallels, I'm not convinced personally that they are any more alike than apples and oranges.

straight talker wrote:

Squawk wrote:

Sojourner wrote:WTF????

LOL - just as well the photoshoppers put the two ladies in those spots, and not the other way around.

whats all that mean squak?

In the pic Sojourner attached, Julia is in the car (and not on the street). Phew.