Page 1 of 2

FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:34 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
Ive been a big supporter of a FAT TAX

Tax all junkfood outlets that sell food that is grossly fattening etc.

The money could then be re-directed to help subsidise cheap fruit n veg. Promote to school kids healthy eating. The cost may help people look for a healthier food alternative.

I love a good whopper like most of us do, and I would have no qualms in paying extra, so long as the money is spent wisely by the government - and I know that is wishful thinking.

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:51 pm
by dedja
nah, bring in a stupid tax ... lot's more opportunity for revenue.

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:27 pm
by Dog_ger
dedja wrote:nah, bring in a stupid tax ... lot's more opportunity for revenue.


Bring in the everybody tax.

you want to breathe.... pay for each breath.... The Breath Tax.

Good idea, hey Gillard......

At least it will pay for your next payrise... :ymapplause:

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:41 pm
by Gozu
dedja wrote:nah, bring in a stupid tax ...


That's what the pokies are for isn't it? ;)

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:48 pm
by Psyber
Gozu wrote:
dedja wrote:nah, bring in a stupid tax ...
That's what the pokies are for isn't it? ;)
Spot on, Gozu :lol:
Although, to be strictly honest and serious, I have to add that it's not just stupidity..
The conditioning technique inherent in their design would gradually train most users to keep increasing the behaviour if they were not highly suspicious to start with and therefore cautious..

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:39 pm
by southee
Gozu wrote:
dedja wrote:nah, bring in a stupid tax ...


That's what the pokies are for isn't it? ;)


Yep!!! Sure is !!!

They could put a tax on it ... Do agree MT but society and people are that thick, lazy and plain simple that thèy would still pay for the fast food :(

Has not worked for the alco tax ... People still drink , assault others and there are still alcoholics.

Won't work as there will still be obesity , health problems and parents too lazy to make their kids a healthy meal .

One thing I hate is that McDonalds Olympic ad with the kid under the blanket with his dad bringing him maccas to eat at midnight !!! Sends the wrong message I reckon :(

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:47 pm
by Sky Pilot
Federal MP Bill Shorten wants to buy his kid a pie from one of those dreadful 7-11 style convenience stores on the way to soccer practice. Nice

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:49 pm
by dedja
maybe start here ...

Image

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:30 am
by Sky Pilot
Just as well Gina and Clive Palmer are not an item. They wouldn't be able to stomach each other.

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:42 pm
by DOC
Sky Pilot wrote:Federal MP Bill Shorten wants to buy his kid a pie from one of those dreadful 7-11 style convenience stores on the way to soccer practice. Nice


What was he thinking? Buying something for his son to eat!

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:44 am
by prowling panther
dedja wrote:maybe start here ...

Image



I dont give a **** how much money she has, no way I would find myself waking up along side that of a mornings.

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:53 am
by dedja
You'd be a Gina bitch for a lazy billion ... :lol:

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 1:18 am
by Gozu
To quote Magoo from Romper Stomper, "I ain't livin with no fat bitch" ;)

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:38 am
by kickinit
What the government need to do is actually show cheap and easy healthy eating can be. A kilo a chicken breast is usually $9 and you can usually find place that have it for $6 a kilo. Rice is about $0.30 for half a cup. And you always find veggies on special. You can easily cook a healthy meal for under $5

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:39 pm
by Jimmy
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Ive been a big supporter of a FAT TAX

Tax all junkfood outlets that sell food that is grossly fattening etc.

The money could then be re-directed to help subsidise cheap fruit n veg. Promote to school kids healthy eating. The cost may help people look for a healthier food alternative.

I love a good whopper like most of us do, and I would have no qualms in paying extra, so long as the money is spent wisely by the government - and I know that is wishful thinking.


Personal responsibility anyone? Like McEnroe said...."you can't be serious" :shock:

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:48 pm
by MatteeG
southee wrote:Has not worked for the alco tax ... People still drink , assault others and there are still alcoholics.



Thats cos they upped the tax on the wrong thing! I dont know any alcoholics that load up on pre-mix cans, yet you can buy a cask of wine (4-5 LITRES) for $10. If they were serious they'd start by banning >1L recepticles.

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:03 pm
by southee
MatteeG wrote:
southee wrote:Has not worked for the alco tax ... People still drink , assault others and there are still alcoholics.



Thats cos they upped the tax on the wrong thing! I dont know any alcoholics that load up on pre-mix cans, yet you can buy a cask of wine (4-5 LITRES) for $10. If they were serious they'd start by banning >1L recepticles.


Yep agree with that Matty G ;)

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:23 pm
by Bully
if gina offered you 1 billion for a night with her, you would say no to a billion??? hmmmmm :roll:

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:32 pm
by dedja
as long as I didn't have to inhale ...

by the way, you realise someone's been there at least 4 times ... :ymsick:

Re: FAT TAX

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:06 pm
by scoob
dedja wrote:as long as I didn't have to inhale ...

by the way, you realise someone's been there at least 4 times ... :ymsick:


Are you saying she is $4b poorer?