by Sojourner » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:28 pm
by Grahaml » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:46 am
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:51 am
by GWW » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:26 am
by tipper » Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:13 am
Sky Pilot wrote:When is the election? March I think but not sure. I'm sure I'm not the only one who believes Whetherill is a complete failure and this is just another example of this.
by gossipgirl » Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:12 am
by tipper » Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:18 am
gossipgirl wrote:I think the state Libs will start ramping up now that the federal election is over. One suspects they dont need to do very much to win easily in March
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:02 pm
tipper wrote:gossipgirl wrote:I think the state Libs will start ramping up now that the federal election is over. One suspects they dont need to do very much to win easily in March
agreed, but surely they have to let us know who they are!!
by RustyCage » Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:12 pm
by Psyber » Fri Sep 13, 2013 6:32 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:The Liberal leader is Stephen Marshall. A bloody good bloke and very capable. It's been hard for him to get traction because of the Federal crap that has dominated the world since Ms Gillard announced the election back in January. I agree though, he needs an aggressive party machine to crank up now.tipper wrote:agreed, but surely they have to let us know who they are!!gossipgirl wrote:I think the state Libs will start ramping up now that the federal election is over. One suspects they dont need to do very much to win easily in March
by Leaping Lindner » Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:27 am
Psyber wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:The Liberal leader is Stephen Marshall. A bloody good bloke and very capable. It's been hard for him to get traction because of the Federal crap that has dominated the world since Ms Gillard announced the election back in January. I agree though, he needs an aggressive party machine to crank up now.tipper wrote:agreed, but surely they have to let us know who they are!!gossipgirl wrote:I think the state Libs will start ramping up now that the federal election is over. One suspects they dont need to do very much to win easily in March
http://www.stevenmarshall.com.au/#S Marshall.jpg
by Punk Rooster » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:18 pm
pafc1870 wrote:As a teacher, I find the way this issue has been dealt with by the government to be, at best, completely incompetent, and at worst, sweeping pedophilia under the carpet in which case they are as bad as the pedophiles themselves.
Despite having voted Labor in every election since 2000, I will never vote for any Labor party that has anyone involved with this issue as a member.
maybe the ass-clown should think about the children first, and not his own fu*king incompetence being put on public displayGrahaml wrote:On face value it's a disappointing decision. I'm not sure whether he has legitimate concerns over whether the enquiry is an opposition witch hunt (which is reasonably likely) but you'd hope he would be very keen to be a part of the solution.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:32 am
Punk Rooster wrote:pafc1870 wrote:As a teacher, I find the way this issue has been dealt with by the government to be, at best, completely incompetent, and at worst, sweeping pedophilia under the carpet in which case they are as bad as the pedophiles themselves.
Despite having voted Labor in every election since 2000, I will never vote for any Labor party that has anyone involved with this issue as a member.
I have long refused to vote Labor, based on the above principles, but extend that to the rest of my life.
Yes, their inaction on pedophilia, makes them complicit- hence they'll never get my vote again.maybe the ass-clown should think about the children first, and not his own fu*king incompetence being put on public displayGrahaml wrote:On face value it's a disappointing decision. I'm not sure whether he has legitimate concerns over whether the enquiry is an opposition witch hunt (which is reasonably likely) but you'd hope he would be very keen to be a part of the solution.
by Psyber » Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:50 am
by Punk Rooster » Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:47 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Leaping Lindner » Wed Sep 18, 2013 12:09 am
Punk Rooster wrote:Yeah, that is pretty ordinary LL.
I'm not particularly an Abbott fan, even less so after refreshing myself on that matter.
Just another reason the Catholic Church, I mean religion in general, should be abolished through heavy taxation, and extremely long jail sentences for these turbulent priests.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:13 am
Leaping Lindner wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Yeah, that is pretty ordinary LL.
I'm not particularly an Abbott fan, even less so after refreshing myself on that matter.
Just another reason the Catholic Church, I mean religion in general, should be abolished through heavy taxation, and extremely long jail sentences for these turbulent priests.
Want a surplus?? TAX RELIGION.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Psyber » Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:24 am
by Sojourner » Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:31 pm
Psyber wrote:I'd support applying income tax to all religious group income, but allowing deductibility for genuine charitable work expenses.
Back on topic - what is there to hide?
by Grahaml » Sat Sep 28, 2013 1:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |