SA Footy

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Trader wrote:

Q. wrote:

Apachebulldog wrote:8.00am: Twitter bans conservatives

Where is this evidence that Twitter put a blanket ban on conservatives? Banning Trump's accounts doesn't = all conservative accounts banned

Where did Apache say they did ban all conservatives.
Provided they banned a second one (other than trump), then his statement is correct.

And here you go

Apachebulldog wrote:Hang on Pelosi the witch tweet in 2017 did not meet community standards LOL

Twitter Facebook Google etc all full of HYPOCRITES


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXdE2wyDQQs

Apachebulldog wrote:

Magellan wrote:

Apachebulldog wrote:I want you to do some research and prove to me Kamala Harris Cortez Ilhan Omar Presley and hosts of others are not Commies.

Notwithstanding the above, I'll take the bait. Let's focus on Harris.

First, Communism is defined and explained below (presumably what Apache means by 'commie'). Note the use of YouTube sources.

https://www.youtube.com/watch/qElx_EyTTKA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bc7EGTfVCg8

So, to be a 'commie', it follows that Harris must espouse the values of communism.


Second, Harris' political values:

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/11/what-kamala-harris-believes-key-issues-positions-and-votes-393807

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53770654

Nothing here about abolishing the class system, property collectivization by the state, and the state controlling the means of production and eliminating the private sector, or any other aspects of communism.

Harris also has accumulated shitloads of money (courtesy of her husband), which doesn't sound like a someone who wants to share all their earnings with everyone else in society. Same goes for her husband, who was (until very recently) in the private sector as a partner for a bigtime international law firm.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2020/10/30/how-kamala-harris-and-her-husband-earned-over-7-million-while-she-served-in-the-us-senate/

https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2020/11/10/doug-emhoff-leaves-dla-piper-partnership-as-biden-harris-transition-continues/?slreturn=20210012125233

So, if Harris believes deep-down in communism as a model for society, then why marry someone who clearly doesn't?


Therefore, Kamala Harris cannot be a 'commie.' QED (Latin for 'I saw it on YouTube').

Some good points there but you still cannot deny she has some progressive ideals and views.

Apachebulldog wrote:

Magellan wrote:

Apachebulldog wrote:I want you to do some research and prove to me Kamala Harris Cortez Ilhan Omar Presley and hosts of others are not Commies.

Notwithstanding the above, I'll take the bait. Let's focus on Harris.

First, Communism is defined and explained below (presumably what Apache means by 'commie'). Note the use of YouTube sources.

https://www.youtube.com/watch/qElx_EyTTKA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bc7EGTfVCg8

So, to be a 'commie', it follows that Harris must espouse the values of communism.


Second, Harris' political values:

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/11/what-kamala-harris-believes-key-issues-positions-and-votes-393807

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53770654

Nothing here about abolishing the class system, property collectivization by the state, and the state controlling the means of production and eliminating the private sector, or any other aspects of communism.

Harris also has accumulated shitloads of money (courtesy of her husband), which doesn't sound like a someone who wants to share all their earnings with everyone else in society. Same goes for her husband, who was (until very recently) in the private sector as a partner for a bigtime international law firm.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2020/10/30/how-kamala-harris-and-her-husband-earned-over-7-million-while-she-served-in-the-us-senate/

https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2020/11/10/doug-emhoff-leaves-dla-piper-partnership-as-biden-harris-transition-continues/?slreturn=20210012125233

So, if Harris believes deep-down in communism as a model for society, then why marry someone who clearly doesn't?


Therefore, Kamala Harris cannot be a 'commie.' QED (Latin for 'I saw it on YouTube').

Some good points there but you still cannot deny she has some progressive ideals and views.

My question is are the American people especially Black Americans going to be better off under these new Democrats.

Have a look at my YouTube links (can't believe I'm saying that) on communism, or any reliable text on political science/philosophy.

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Have a look at my YouTube links (can't believe I'm saying that) on communism, or any reliable text on political science/philosophy.

Looks like Apache is getting you onboard Magellan

Q. wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Trader wrote:

Q. wrote:
Where is this evidence that Twitter put a blanket ban on conservatives? Banning Trump's accounts doesn't = all conservative accounts banned

Where did Apache say they did ban all conservatives.
Provided they banned a second one (other than trump), then his statement is correct.

And here you go

This account often promoted QAnon conspiracy theories regarding rigged election.

Twitter said they were purging accounts promulgating QAnon conspiracies. That's not silencing conservatives, it's silencing disinformation.

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Q. wrote:This account often promoted QAnon conspiracy theories regarding rigged election.

Twitter said they were purging accounts promulgating QAnon conspiracies. That's not silencing conservatives, it's silencing disinformation.

Prove it

Trader wrote:Sorry PP, but we're going to need you to remove that post.
Self appointed judge, jury and executioner for all things political, Q, has already ruled that any link between the attacks on the capital and the BLM movement are not allowed.

Thank you for your understanding.

Magellan wrote:Trump now impeached for a second time, or if you're keen on fruit, he now has a pear of peaches.

Q. wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Q. wrote:This account often promoted QAnon conspiracy theories regarding rigged election.

Twitter said they were purging accounts promulgating QAnon conspiracies. That's not silencing conservatives, it's silencing disinformation.

Prove it

Bit hard to take screenshots on a deleted account.

Toomey-Right was often RT'd or liked into my feed by "conservative" accounts that I follow, so I'm fully aware of the conspiracy tweets that were promoted by that account.