by untapped ability » Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:09 pm
by leonidis » Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:15 pm
by lincolnsdirtysecrets » Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:28 pm
by livefooty » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:04 pm
by lincolnsdirtysecrets » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:20 pm
by leonidis » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:24 pm
by westcoastpanther » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:54 pm
by overloaded » Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:12 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:No one more qualified than you to know....
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by untapped ability » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:11 pm
by untapped ability » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:19 pm
lincolnsdirtysecrets wrote:We have been assured by the PLFL that they will investigate the whole Semmler deal and prior codes of conduct. If the TFC are found to be in breach of the rules what do we think should happen to them? What is a fair penalty?
I was thinking they should be fined but then I thought some more and it would end up the tax payer paying for it anyway so I thought they should have points taken off them. (If they win any games). Any other thoughts?
by OnSong » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:25 pm
untapped ability wrote:Speaking of cricket , our b grade will not go out to Coffin Bay to play again. They said it was 10 degrees hotter out at coffins than in lincoln and the amount of flies was absurd. The oval is very small also.
What does the future hold for the Tasman cricket club? They made only 50 runs on the weekend against souths pop gun attack. How embarresing. Should they fold?
by OnSong » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:33 pm
untapped ability wrote:But do you honestly think Carl S is going to testify that he was approached to play for Tasmans before a letter went in? It is just one of those things that will never get proven a bit like the ravendale-tasman-council deal behind the PLFL's back.
by lincolnsdirtysecrets » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:45 pm
OnSong wrote:untapped ability wrote:But do you honestly think Carl S is going to testify that he was approached to play for Tasmans before a letter went in? It is just one of those things that will never get proven a bit like the ravendale-tasman-council deal behind the PLFL's back.
MR took the TFC to the tribunal over the very same issue last year when Ronnie offered Carl work. Carl quit his job and all only to be told when he was to start work that he now needs to sign a clearance. Nothing had been mentioned of changing clubs until this point, whether that is naive of Carl or not is another issue. Ronnie and Bucky simply denied everything at the tribunal last year and they were cleared. Given it's happening again the PLFL should see they were played for fools last year and come down hard.
Seems the TFC is good at recruiting people by offering them a livelyhood, not getting people who actually want to be there. Carl doesn't like them, but who would refuse his deal. Scruff doesn't want to be there, but can't knock back all Keiths landscaping work. This is why they have an uncommitted side, and now it includes the coach. At least Ronnie loved the club and had passion.
by overloaded » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:50 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by livefooty » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:19 pm
by overloaded » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:59 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by westcoastpanther » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:24 pm
by OldCooper » Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:36 pm
by sherrin22 » Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:45 pm
OnSong wrote:untapped ability wrote:But do you honestly think Carl S is going to testify that he was approached to play for Tasmans before a letter went in? It is just one of those things that will never get proven a bit like the ravendale-tasman-council deal behind the PLFL's back.
MR took the TFC to the tribunal over the very same issue last year when Ronnie offered Carl work. Carl quit his job and all only to be told when he was to start work that he now needs to sign a clearance. Nothing had been mentioned of changing clubs until this point, whether that is naive of Carl or not is another issue. Ronnie and Bucky simply denied everything at the tribunal last year and they were cleared. Given it's happening again the PLFL should see they were played for fools last year and come down hard.
Seems the TFC is good at recruiting people by offering them a livelyhood, not getting people who actually want to be there. Carl doesn't like them, but who would refuse his deal. Scruff doesn't want to be there, but can't knock back all Keiths landscaping work. This is why they have an uncommitted side, and now it includes the coach. At least Ronnie loved the club and had passion.
by livefooty » Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:46 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |