SA Footy

magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win

norm11 wrote:

magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win

The gowans.

norm11 wrote:

magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win

The gowans.

jumbo wrote:

norm11 wrote:

magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win

The gowans.

nah - reckon there was a Sturt (2002 or 3) and an Eagles (2010?) Premiership that beat the Doggies

daysofourlives wrote:Not sure on exact numbers but the Gowans played a heap of Grand Finals before coming to Centrals. Am sure they played in a senior grand final every year of their playing life except 2012

norm11 wrote:Sorry, chris played in 17 consecutive gfs. Won 9. 8 in a row

magpieeagle wrote:

jumbo wrote:

norm11 wrote:

magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win

The gowans.

nah - reckon there was a Sturt (2002 or 3) and an Eagles (2010?) Premiership that beat the Doggies

yea the gowans have 9 but not in a row

norm11 wrote:Sorry, chris played in 17 consecutive gfs. Won 9. 8 in a row

Swamp Donkey wrote:Any significant player or coach movements for next season?

Mallala: Scott Hahn - retired

United: Cam Faulkner - returning to Kadina

Hamley: Herberle appointed A grade coach.



I'm sure there must be others.

Kcco wrote:

Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.

Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.

Lame Choice wrote:

Kcco wrote:

Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.

Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.

Up for discussion tonight - someone must be reading this stuff. Onya SA Footy

mighty hounds wrote:

Swamp Donkey wrote:Any significant player or coach movements for next season?

Mallala: Scott Hahn - retired

United: Cam Faulkner - returning to Kadina

Hamley: Herberle appointed A grade coach.



I'm sure there must be others.

Maybe there isn't? Still pretty fresh in the off season

Swamp Donkey wrote:

Lame Choice wrote:

Kcco wrote:

Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.

Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.

Up for discussion tonight - someone must be reading this stuff. Onya SA Footy

Any news?

Swamp Donkey wrote:

Lame Choice wrote:

Kcco wrote:

Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.

Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.

Up for discussion tonight - someone must be reading this stuff. Onya SA Footy

Any news?