by finding facts » Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:31 pm
by Start » Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:32 am
wedge tail wrote:you seem to talk a lot of sense Start. Must be all those coffees you seem to have at cena which are making you more alert. Whether or not what you say is true can only be seen in a couple of weeks. Regardless all the more reason to play Joel as he can run the ball and take blokes out as well. Rumor has it, it is up to him whether or not he plays. Coming back from a serious injury they have left it in his hands. Knowing him he will make himself available even if he is only 70%. But 70% is probably enough against some of these other areas which is a credit to the APFL and the standard of competition they have.
by tigertalk » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:19 am
by Start » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:23 pm
tigertalk wrote:The assoc. side should be picked on form from this year. Just because a guy becomes available now and who may have been good in the past doesnt warrant automatic selection! What kind of message does that send out to players?
by Swamp Donkey » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:27 pm
by tigertalk » Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:18 pm
Start wrote:tigertalk wrote:The assoc. side should be picked on form from this year. Just because a guy becomes available now and who may have been good in the past doesnt warrant automatic selection! What kind of message does that send out to players?
You pick from the best available, and from players who have done the job in the past, Joel is in that catergory.
by faxuwill » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:26 pm
there are laws in australia (criminal laws) that dont apply in this league eg indecent exposure,assult causing bodily harm and racial vilification!!!!! the members on the judical panel should at all times abide by the writen laws of the constitution and where precidence has been set they are obliged to follow suit.leftriteout wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:yeah not sure about early, he came off late against two wells last week, he looked sore all game but still ahd an inflence. Reidy is a class act shame he ll be missing.
Ps how do these blokes get round playing, i mean are they def injured (apart from early) or can they shrug off playing that easily?
You question the injuries of everyone but 'his greatness' early!! (those b&w colours showing there!)![]()
Its easy to get off!!Just dont play the week before or after association.
eg.
Reid (not playing this week)
CCC (hasnt played for a week or so)
- As far as i have heard APFL has some of the toughest rules in regards to assoc (tougher again this year). If you dont make your self available (and havent missed the game before or dont miss the game after assoc.) you will face suspension (no ifs or buts).
BUT just like the balak runner got off (they always seem to get off!!) some people will fight the system.
by wedge tail » Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:08 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:31 pm
wedge tail wrote:the state country side in which Joel was best this year was played before the start of the season so how do you justify form on that basis. Furthermore it shows that he can play good football despite an extended break. Would you overlook Shane Warne to play in the Australian cricket side if he had missed 3 games? (prior to his retirment of course!!). Anyway, he may not play so no point worrying about it too much.
Other than the Hummocks game, there seemed to be some good hit outs on the weekend. Are Balak really a chance to miss finals after playing in GF last year or will Two Wells faulter??
by The Rooster » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:24 pm
by The Rooster » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:38 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:41 pm
The Rooster wrote:Two Wells will faulter!! Thats my tip, balak will only get stronger from here on in with key players to come back, and the youth of tw may bring some inconsistency to their form.
The shane warne call is an absolute barry crocker mate, like comparing fire and water. We could not expect joel as good as he is to play at his best this week after 6 weeks off.
Its bloody farcical this association stuff. Theres two standards, the apfl expects every player in the league(170 approx) not to plan anything for the long weekend in june every year. What a joke.
All it is about is ensuring that the head honchos of the apfl can walk into sanfl country footy meetings with their bloody chest out looking like king d#*k because we were the strongest team at the carnival. Lets be honest, if the apfl looses this carnival to yorkes or barossa who really cares. Honestly!!!!!
by leftriteout » Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:12 pm
Start wrote:wedge tail wrote:you seem to talk a lot of sense Start. Must be all those coffees you seem to have at cena which are making you more alert. Whether or not what you say is true can only be seen in a couple of weeks. Regardless all the more reason to play Joel as he can run the ball and take blokes out as well. Rumor has it, it is up to him whether or not he plays. Coming back from a serious injury they have left it in his hands. Knowing him he will make himself available even if he is only 70%. But 70% is probably enough against some of these other areas which is a credit to the APFL and the standard of competition they have.
Joel Wilson if available would be a dead cert if I was picking the side, a great inside player who can kick you a couple of goals.
by tigertalk » Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:42 pm
by The Rooster » Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:19 pm
by muckhole » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:13 pm
by faxuwill » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:37 pm
tigertalk wrote:I saw there was a pretty close game down at Virginia on the weekend. Anyone get down there and watch the game?
Also another close game at Two Wells!
Good to see the competition is alive and going well.
by faxuwill » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:45 pm
leftriteout wrote:Start wrote:wedge tail wrote:you seem to talk a lot of sense Start. Must be all those coffees you seem to have at cena which are making you more alert. Whether or not what you say is true can only be seen in a couple of weeks. Regardless all the more reason to play Joel as he can run the ball and take blokes out as well. Rumor has it, it is up to him whether or not he plays. Coming back from a serious injury they have left it in his hands. Knowing him he will make himself available even if he is only 70%. But 70% is probably enough against some of these other areas which is a credit to the APFL and the standard of competition they have.
Joel Wilson if available would be a dead cert if I was picking the side, a great inside player who can kick you a couple of goals.
Good to see Joel kicking some goals on the weekend. Few players will start dreading the fact that he is back when they line up on him!!!
by faxuwill » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:56 pm
all resect to joel, but are 4 real you can`t honestly put those two on the same page!!!!!! sorry but maybe you have the old jock strap wedged in your tailwedge tail wrote:the state country side in which Joel was best this year was played before the start of the season so how do you justify form on that basis. Furthermore it shows that he can play good football despite an extended break. Would you overlook Shane Warne to play in the Australian cricket side if he had missed 3 games? (prior to his retirment of course!!). Anyway, he may not play so no point worrying about it too much.
Other than the Hummocks game, there seemed to be some good hit outs on the weekend. Are Balak really a chance to miss finals after playing in GF last year or will Two Wells faulter??
by upyamuva » Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:43 am
muckhole wrote:Hey guys new fella on board and most of you know who i am, I am not going to hide behind a ficticious name so i can offend someone.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |