by ironknob » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:28 pm
by djd » Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:53 am
by Old Son » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:02 am
by heater31 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:31 am
djd wrote:geee whats happening down there? the port lincoln league has made the the Advertiser AND the biggest paper in the land the Herald Sun.
by ravendale rulz » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:54 am
by leonidis » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:59 am
by westcoastpanther » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:00 am
by coyote ugly » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:01 am
by bluestheboy » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:22 am
by Old Son » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:36 am
ravendale rulz wrote:OMG
3. If this story is fabricated then the club that 'snitched' on them need to be held accountable. These clubs had have there differences over the past few seasons and this tit for tat stuff must stop. If fabricated by a particular club ( possibly for payback) then I urge all clubs to make a stand against the snitching club at the end of the season and have them banished from our competition or we start our own competition.
by westcoastpanther » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:50 am
Old Son wrote:ravendale rulz wrote:OMG
3. If this story is fabricated then the club that 'snitched' on them need to be held accountable. These clubs had have there differences over the past few seasons and this tit for tat stuff must stop. If fabricated by a particular club ( possibly for payback) then I urge all clubs to make a stand against the snitching club at the end of the season and have them banished from our competition or we start our own competition.
I would expect a defamation claim to be lodged if this is the case.
by OnSong » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:58 am
bluestheboy wrote:A fair few browsing this forum today.
by ravendale rulz » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:21 am
Old Son wrote:ravendale rulz wrote:OMG
3. If this story is fabricated then the club that 'snitched' on them need to be held accountable. These clubs had have there differences over the past few seasons and this tit for tat stuff must stop. If fabricated by a particular club ( possibly for payback) then I urge all clubs to make a stand against the snitching club at the end of the season and have them banished from our competition or we start our own competition.
I would expect a defamation claim to be lodged if this is the case.
by OnSong » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:24 am
ravendale rulz wrote:Old Son wrote:ravendale rulz wrote:OMG
3. If this story is fabricated then the club that 'snitched' on them need to be held accountable. These clubs had have there differences over the past few seasons and this tit for tat stuff must stop. If fabricated by a particular club ( possibly for payback) then I urge all clubs to make a stand against the snitching club at the end of the season and have them banished from our competition or we start our own competition.
I would expect a defamation claim to be lodged if this is the case.
Who would they claim against?
by ravendale rulz » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:26 am
by OnSong » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:30 am
by Old Son » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:42 am
OnSong wrote:ravendale rulz wrote:Old Son wrote:ravendale rulz wrote:OMG
3. If this story is fabricated then the club that 'snitched' on them need to be held accountable. These clubs had have there differences over the past few seasons and this tit for tat stuff must stop. If fabricated by a particular club ( possibly for payback) then I urge all clubs to make a stand against the snitching club at the end of the season and have them banished from our competition or we start our own competition.
I would expect a defamation claim to be lodged if this is the case.
Who would they claim against?
Has a club been named? Tough to defame a nameless club.
by OnSong » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:58 am
by Bum Crack » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:28 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |