by Ken Whelan Fan » Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:07 pm
by wlm » Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:03 pm
by Ken Whelan Fan » Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:09 pm
by Media Park » Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:36 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by bluestheboy » Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:52 pm
Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
by Media Park » Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:58 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by ironknob » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:52 pm
bluestheboy wrote:Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
As a Wayback LM (or WLM as we like to call them) I don't necessarily agree with the action we have taken, but neither did I agree with the actions of the player concerned.
As for calling it a dog act...KWF you are better than that!
by steakn » Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:03 pm
ironknob wrote:bluestheboy wrote:Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
As a Wayback LM (or WLM as we like to call them) I don't necessarily agree with the action we have taken, but neither did I agree with the actions of the player concerned.
As for calling it a dog act...KWF you are better than that!
I wasn't happy with the incident either , however i would be disgusted if my club behaved like the WFC today. We prefer to do our talkiing on the field. This is a weak action from a weak club.
This will not be forgotten.
by Media Park » Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:09 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by leonidis » Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:23 pm
Media Park wrote:A Tasman footballer allegedly elbowed Keatley.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
by coyote ugly » Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:42 pm
Ken Whelan Fan wrote:possibly the lowest dog act by any club in the history of the PLFL
by dukes of hazard » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:03 pm
by coyote ugly » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:18 pm
dukes of hazard wrote:Can every body believe how lucky tasmans are they have players, supporters and parents that voulenteer around the club, some that coach, some that umpire on Saturdays and some that even come out to support the juniors!!! That sounds like ever other sporting club is the country!!!! Its not a culture its how clubs work!!!!
by bluestheboy » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:20 pm
ironknob wrote:bluestheboy wrote:Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
As a Wayback LM (or WLM as we like to call them) I don't necessarily agree with the action we have taken, but neither did I agree with the actions of the player concerned.
As for calling it a dog act...KWF you are better than that!
I wasn't happy with the incident either , however i would be disgusted if my club behaved like the WFC today. We prefer to do our talkiing on the field. This is a weak action from a weak club.
This will not be forgotten.
by steakn » Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:37 pm
Media Park wrote:A Tasman footballer allegedly elbowed Keatley.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
by captian cook » Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:15 am
by Ken Whelan Fan » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:01 am
by Justquietly » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:12 am
Media Park wrote:A Tasman footballer allegedly elbowed Keatley.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
by Ken Whelan Fan » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:18 am
by coyote ugly » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:01 am
Ken Whelan Fan wrote:BTB you forgot the word "allegedly"
If Semmler had made deliberate contact with an umpire as your club has reported him for
then dont you think the umpire would have red carded him and reported him.
As for a dog act BTB I honestly thought that you guys were better than that.
You won the game fair and square.
now it seems you want to make sure that our participation in the final series is curtailed
by means other than on the field fighting for the pill.
Your Club has a proud and long history of Success on and off the field......
not anymore it seems.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |