by slug » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:25 pm
by Kick'n Back » Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:29 pm
Newsbreaker wrote:beer o'clock wrote:the big fella wrote:Tv spend over 100k per year
Kingston spend $60 per year ( and they have jsut lost there best player to another club re $)
Most HFL clubs spend $50k or more per year.
A HFL club was recenlty talking to a player (forward) who wanted a $20k signon fee and $1k per game!!! he wont be playing in the HFL!!!
Where are TV getting all of their money and is it sustainable. If they can get 100K per year to spend on players and can consistently do it every year then its not an issue and every one should get over it.
Torrens Valley get most of there money because there coach owns a Successful Construction Company (Gary Hughes Construction) and if he wants to continue to put heaps of money into a club which he supports everyone else should not worry about it and focus on there own club.
Also from what I know most clubs do spend upwards of $50k on payments and on what I know Blackwood (which is meant to be one of the biggest spenders) spent just over this last year on player payments ($54,000 from what I heard)
If the clubs want to spend the money on players, it is totally there choice, but it does make it hard for smaller clubs to compete and at what point do you put a line through it and say 'that the most were spending on players.'
But I'm sure in the future we will hear about some clubs that have folded because they are unable to compete on and off the field with players and payments.
by Newsbreaker » Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:37 pm
Kick'n Back wrote:Newsbreaker wrote:beer o'clock wrote:the big fella wrote:Tv spend over 100k per year
Kingston spend $60 per year ( and they have jsut lost there best player to another club re $)
Most HFL clubs spend $50k or more per year.
A HFL club was recenlty talking to a player (forward) who wanted a $20k signon fee and $1k per game!!! he wont be playing in the HFL!!!
Where are TV getting all of their money and is it sustainable. If they can get 100K per year to spend on players and can consistently do it every year then its not an issue and every one should get over it.
Torrens Valley get most of there money because there coach owns a Successful Construction Company (Gary Hughes Construction) and if he wants to continue to put heaps of money into a club which he supports everyone else should not worry about it and focus on there own club.
Also from what I know most clubs do spend upwards of $50k on payments and on what I know Blackwood (which is meant to be one of the biggest spenders) spent just over this last year on player payments ($54,000 from what I heard)
If the clubs want to spend the money on players, it is totally there choice, but it does make it hard for smaller clubs to compete and at what point do you put a line through it and say 'that the most were spending on players.'
But I'm sure in the future we will hear about some clubs that have folded because they are unable to compete on and off the field with players and payments.
I heard that the 54k was just spent on the juniors
by McGovern » Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:35 pm
by Darth Vader » Thu Feb 03, 2011 5:26 pm
McGovern wrote:How can a Premieship be measured? What is one worth to a club (dollars)? Clubs spend north of 50-60k for nil return (premiership). These same clubs I'm sure could use better lights, facilities, etc. Where does it end? Even if you win a Premiership, it ain't gonna get any cheaper for you next year! I'm a romantic living in a dream world, but I'm gonna hang onto that dream that people might one day play at a club because they enjoy it and that's where their mates play.
by NO-MERCY » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:50 pm
Seagull wrote:You cant buy a premiership, they all take hard work and you still have to win on the big day
by lebron » Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:49 am
by McGovern » Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:25 pm
by pushing forward » Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:37 am
McGovern wrote:I never thought I would see the day that a born and bred Brooker would play somewhere else for money. Especially after the "You can't buy what we've got" catchphrase aimed at Gazza and his chequebook. I spose they've delivered a couple premierships and now it's time to cash in??
by cominghome » Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:57 am
by McGovern » Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:22 am
cominghome wrote:McGovern wrote:How can a Premieship be measured? What is one worth to a club (dollars)? Clubs spend north of 50-60k for nil return (premiership). These same clubs I'm sure could use better lights, facilities, etc. Where does it end? Even if you win a Premiership, it ain't gonna get any cheaper for you next year! I'm a romantic living in a dream world, but I'm gonna hang onto that dream that people might one day play at a club because they enjoy it and that's where their mates play.[/q
According to the SGL Forum hasn't your club just drop some of those values you have spoken about in your dream world.
Quote: Safety in number
by 7-Dog » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:43 am
cominghome wrote:McGovern wrote:How can a Premieship be measured? What is one worth to a club (dollars)? Clubs spend north of 50-60k for nil return (premiership). These same clubs I'm sure could use better lights, facilities, etc. Where does it end? Even if you win a Premiership, it ain't gonna get any cheaper for you next year! I'm a romantic living in a dream world, but I'm gonna hang onto that dream that people might one day play at a club because they enjoy it and that's where their mates play.[/q
According to the SGL Forum hasn't your club just drop some of those values you have spoken about in your dream world.
Quote: Safety in number
by Bum Crack » Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:28 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:34 pm
Bum Crack wrote:In an ideal world, there would be a salary cap that is policed on a continuous basis and the closer the club to the city, the lower the salary cap and the further away from the city, the higher the salary cap. Won't happen, but that's what I think should happen. No wonder clubs 300 k's or further from town struggle to get players when the so called country clubs 15 minutes from the outskirts of Adelaide's outer suburbs are paying ridiculous money for players.
by OnSong » Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:32 pm
by straight talker » Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:07 pm
by Flipper » Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:27 pm
McGovern wrote:cominghome wrote:McGovern wrote:How can a Premieship be measured? What is one worth to a club (dollars)? Clubs spend north of 50-60k for nil return (premiership). These same clubs I'm sure could use better lights, facilities, etc. Where does it end? Even if you win a Premiership, it ain't gonna get any cheaper for you next year! I'm a romantic living in a dream world, but I'm gonna hang onto that dream that people might one day play at a club because they enjoy it and that's where their mates play.[/q
According to the SGL Forum hasn't your club just drop some of those values you have spoken about in your dream world.
Quote: Safety in number
They're my own values! It's easy for me to have them too cos I'm not somebody who would ever be offered money to play either! Feel free anybody to correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt there's a club anywhere (above div 5 amateur level) that doesn't pay at least one player something above best player awards?
by been there done that » Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:19 pm
by overthehill » Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:25 pm
by 7-Dog » Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:31 pm
overthehill wrote:you lads might want to crunch some numbers when it comes to TV.
early this year Billy Neely told gary he has signed with Onkas for $800 per match and will not leave for under double. The rumoured figure is $2200. Here are my sums and i have a reasonable source
B. Neely $2200
J. Jaques $1950
D. Ellis $1600
L. Ellis $1600
J. Hill $1750 (plus weekly airfares)
Then add Mazzone, Cooper, Hunter, Burges, Surman and Young (easy $3-4k)
Now if you can show a man walking around that seriously thinks Gary puts a team on the park for under $10k per week, I'll show you an idiot
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |