Goldberg wrote:I think the RMFL is not getting the respect it deserves here. We have gone down to the GSFL by 1,2 & 7 points respectively in the last 3 seasons in our annual association match, & have approx, 21 blokes running around in our comp who have played at league level or better. Plus many more who have played reserves. Add to that Div 1 blokes (which is a stronger comp then any Country comp) & a compliment of some VERY good locals who have made state country sides, & i cant see why we are so far down that list.
The only thing against us, but I think this happens in EVERY COMP ACROSS THE STATE, is that there is a marked difference between top & bottom upwards of 15 goals on a regular basis
I think in the last 5 years the comp has gone forward 3 fold after dropping off considerably through the earlier naughtys, after the 90's when we were possibly considered a Level 1 league!
We would quite comfortably beat any of the Level 3 association sides IMHO & also level 2 ones aswell
But is this the criteria for what makes a strong comp??? Not sure, but its what I'm using, because if your using eveness or something similar then SFL should be Div 5 yet we all know thats rediculous
Goldberg all great points however the GSFL has featured only 1 or 2 players from its powerhouse club Willunga in the past few seasons of assocaition football.
A lot of talent has left the RMFL however yes its not a bad league, just not a grade 1 or 2.
Thanks for bringing my attention to the SFL in grade one, I didnt even look for them and firstly they are not a country assoc IMSO and they are certinaly not a grade one at any point.
Perhaps we need to split clubs in the grade table in order to for ppl to be happy? Biggish job but and it takes away from the overall point maybe.