by GWW » Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:10 pm
by AD » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:12 pm
by GWW » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:26 pm
by AD » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:38 pm
GWW wrote:Wasn't a bad read, but I was a bit surprised that they listed Mt Compass as their "roughie" in GSFL, given they have lost a lot of quality players and are expected by a lot of people to finish down quite low.
by GWW » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:42 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:50 pm
by AD » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:09 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:It'd be hard work putting that thing together.
I reckon it's good work. The Mail's relying on tips from people who 'know' the competitions involved.
Not sloppy journalism, any aspect that's out is misinformed.
by grasshopper22 » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:10 pm
by GWW » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:21 pm
by AD » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:37 pm
by mighty hounds » Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:39 pm
AD wrote:Photos look like they are supplied, don't know about the rest.
I'm coming across as a bit nitpicky here, but I'm just surprised at a few mistakes by what is really supposed to be the one of the state's #1 newspapers.
by Poultry in Motion » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:01 pm
by AD » Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:23 am
Big Cox wrote:It's not a bad read though is it. Something most country players look forward to coming out this time of year. The feature
stories arent bad but most of us probably like to catch up with the Association ins and outs etc and there were a few blunders in these like one SGL team having last years ins and outs list and I find the predictions and roughies a bit hard to fathom at times like last years NEFL Premiers BBH being listed as roughies when their playing list is as strong if not stronger than last years. A few other factual blunders too but really isnt it about giving country footy a fair promo? It does this pretty well I think.
by djd » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:38 am
Big Cox wrote:It's not a bad read though is it. Something most country players look forward to coming out this time of year. The feature
stories arent bad but most of us probably like to catch up with the Association ins and outs etc and there were a few blunders in these like one SGL team having last years ins and outs list and I find the predictions and roughies a bit hard to fathom at times like last years NEFL Premiers BBH being listed as roughies when their playing list is as strong if not stronger than last years. A few other factual blunders too but really isnt it about giving country footy a fair promo? It does this pretty well I think.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:52 am
GWW wrote:I do wonder how much is contributed by the individual leagues/clubs, and how much is done by the Sunday Mail journos.
by Mythical Creature » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:01 am
by grasshopper22 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:04 am
by heater31 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:07 am
grasshopper22 wrote:We noticed down here that alot of the Sunday mails delivered to the town, we're missing the country footy lift out, has anyone else had this problem?
by Mythical Creature » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:17 am
grasshopper22 wrote:We noticed down here that alot of the Sunday mails delivered to the town, we're missing the country footy lift out, has anyone else had this problem?
by grasshopper22 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |