by HH3 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:29 am
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:38 am
HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
by HH3 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:59 am
Look Good In Leather wrote:HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
Should they?
Surely the team representing the state would be the best 22 in the state?
Otherwise, what's the point?
by Pag » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:11 pm
Should they change the name of the side to State Metropolitan Team? Would this satisfy your requirements?Look Good In Leather wrote:HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
Should they?
Surely the team representing the state would be the best 22 in the state?
Otherwise, what's the point?
by Hazel » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:19 pm
by Hazel » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:24 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:25 pm
Pag wrote:Should they change the name of the side to State Metropolitan Team? Would this satisfy your requirements?Look Good In Leather wrote:HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
Should they?
Surely the team representing the state would be the best 22 in the state?
Otherwise, what's the point?
FWIW, I don't think they should wear the red jumper with yellow and blue yoke either.
by tigerpie » Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:13 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:Pag wrote:Should they change the name of the side to State Metropolitan Team? Would this satisfy your requirements?Look Good In Leather wrote:HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
Should they?
Surely the team representing the state would be the best 22 in the state?
Otherwise, what's the point?
FWIW, I don't think they should wear the red jumper with yellow and blue yoke either.
Makes more sense to me
by daysofourlives » Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:52 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
Should they?
Surely the team representing the state would be the best 22 in the state?
Otherwise, what's the point?
by bird of prey » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:17 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
Should they?
Surely the team representing the state would be the best 22 in the state?
Otherwise, what's the point?
And what about the joke of an over 35 "State" team wearing the state jumpers when this is a side just picked from an over 35 super rules sunday comp. Any decent player over that age is still playing real football.
by FroffiesMcVeigh » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:05 am
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:43 am
FroffiesMcVeigh wrote:How much of the state is represented in the SANFL state games? Can't see areas on the limestone coast being represented? Can't see kangaroo island being represented...
Just because they are using the state guernsey, it doesn't mean they are representing every single centimetre of land in SA.
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:45 am
daysofourlives wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:HH3 wrote:So you dont want anyone under SANFL standard having the opportunity to represent their state?
Should they?
Surely the team representing the state would be the best 22 in the state?
Otherwise, what's the point?
And what about the joke of an over 35 "State" team wearing the state jumpers when this is a side just picked from an over 35 super rules sunday comp. Any decent player over that age is still playing real football.
by FOURTH ESTATE » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:51 am
by Robb_Stark » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:47 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |