Footy Chick wrote:Be warned - I'm watching.....
In fact I'm tempted to talk ban on it as it's in the hands of the courts (so to speak)
haha good timing FC.
by teaoby » Tue May 18, 2010 3:52 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Be warned - I'm watching.....
In fact I'm tempted to talk ban on it as it's in the hands of the courts (so to speak)
by Footy Chick » Tue May 18, 2010 4:14 pm
by Choccies » Tue May 18, 2010 4:20 pm
by a2m » Tue May 18, 2010 5:27 pm
by Footy_Rulz » Tue May 18, 2010 11:23 pm
a2m wrote:TRINITY for Life...
What a game this week!!! Can't wait to see you FR, r u blokes at full strength?
TRINITY FOR LIFE!!!
by Footy_Rulz » Tue May 18, 2010 11:25 pm
by S Demon » Wed May 19, 2010 10:59 pm
Footy Chick wrote:in fact - I'm removing all posts on the matter. No further discussion until the investigation is done and dusted.
Thanks
by newbloke » Wed May 19, 2010 11:03 pm
by RedMagpie » Thu May 20, 2010 9:37 am
by teaoby » Thu May 20, 2010 11:51 am
by Footy Chick » Thu May 20, 2010 12:24 pm
by S Demon » Thu May 20, 2010 12:35 pm
newbloke wrote:May i ask what is your concern with it?
by S Demon » Thu May 20, 2010 12:40 pm
teaoby wrote:from all accounts the tribunal thought there wasnt enough evidance because the accused player wasnt there to defend/explain himself in person so it has been posponed to a time that he is able to attend.
also free to play till such time.
by teaoby » Thu May 20, 2010 12:44 pm
S Demon wrote:teaoby wrote:from all accounts the tribunal thought there wasnt enough evidance because the accused player wasnt there to defend/explain himself in person so it has been posponed to a time that he is able to attend.
also free to play till such time.
So a player that is "potentially" facing a hefty suspension for this "alleged" incident is free to play again this week???![]()
So what happens if he does something again and another player is seriously hurt? Will the SAAFL be held liable?
Something's not right here...
by S Demon » Thu May 20, 2010 12:46 pm
teaoby wrote:S Demon wrote:teaoby wrote:from all accounts the tribunal thought there wasnt enough evidance because the accused player wasnt there to defend/explain himself in person so it has been posponed to a time that he is able to attend.
also free to play till such time.
So a player that is "potentially" facing a hefty suspension for this "alleged" incident is free to play again this week???![]()
So what happens if he does something again and another player is seriously hurt? Will the SAAFL be held liable?
Something's not right here...
im just passing on the results and leaving it well alone till its sorted.
by Footy Chick » Thu May 20, 2010 1:02 pm
by Hefty » Thu May 20, 2010 4:54 pm
Footy Chick wrote:No one can say my boys aren't well trained
by Footy Chick » Thu May 20, 2010 5:00 pm
Hefty wrote:Footy Chick wrote:No one can say my boys aren't well trained
pfft....correct me if I'm wrong but his is an opinion forum not factual. how anything said on here will reflect the tribunal is unfounded...so FC tell your story walking.
so Teaboy what happend? paralowie bloke king hit an Old Collegian?
by a2m » Sun May 23, 2010 9:41 am
by Footy_Rulz » Sun May 23, 2010 3:08 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |