SA Footy

marbles wrote:Yeah so in div 3 the bye goes to golden grove, phos, Pembroke & athelstone first four rounds for example

If Salisbury west get put back in who gets the home game and then where does gg phos athelstones cgrade play on the same day and will it mean changes to the div 8 div c1 fixtures hav to be made to accommodate sals back in div 3

Butterfly effect

marbles wrote:too little too late for me...

# if North pines are calling for other players from other clubs to be fill ins, they might have looked impressive with J Lane up front but maybe its just pulled the wool over peoples eyes

# wingfield from my last visit to clearances havent had a single clearance listed, and theyre claiming to have 2 teams?

# making a 7 team Div 7r with 12 games now possibly 3 byes a week, is not what players who pay money to play really want from their money, and the likes of magoo morell would be seething at the idea of possibly a month off at a time throughout the season

# shifting salisbury west back up, IF they have 2 sides is only gonna mess with other div fixtures and then destroy social event plans already made by higher clubs

cracka wrote:

marbles wrote:Yeah so in div 3 the bye goes to golden grove, phos, Pembroke & athelstone first four rounds for example

If Salisbury west get put back in who gets the home game and then where does gg phos athelstones cgrade play on the same day and will it mean changes to the div 8 div c1 fixtures hav to be made to accommodate sals back in div 3

Butterfly effect

If you've ever done programming before you'd know how easy that is to work out, bit hard to explain from my phone however. Simple answer is there's a template where rd 1 the team with the bye is actually an away game then in rd 10 their bye is a home game (or maybe the other way around) & so on for the team who have the byes in rds 2 & 11, 3 & 12 etc. Actually don't think it would be too hard to work out but would need to see the templates used for a definitive answer.

marbles wrote:

cracka wrote:

marbles wrote:Yeah so in div 3 the bye goes to golden grove, phos, Pembroke & athelstone first four rounds for example

If Salisbury west get put back in who gets the home game and then where does gg phos athelstones cgrade play on the same day and will it mean changes to the div 8 div c1 fixtures hav to be made to accommodate sals back in div 3

Butterfly effect

If you've ever done programming before you'd know how easy that is to work out, bit hard to explain from my phone however. Simple answer is there's a template where rd 1 the team with the bye is actually an away game then in rd 10 their bye is a home game (or maybe the other way around) & so on for the team who have the byes in rds 2 & 11, 3 & 12 etc. Actually don't think it would be too hard to work out but would need to see the templates used for a definitive answer.

dude i might be a simpleton & dumb as dog shit, i know how easy you can swap a bye for a team etc etc as before the bye there were ten 10 teams.

BUT there are other parties involved such as C-Grade matches whos home games would now be have to be moved, social event bookings that will be f##ked up because now what is a bye or a home game or an away game now isnt.

theres also now prearranged 3-match days that may need to be cancelled. all kinds of bullshit get arranged based on new fixtures, and you go changing shit around half the saafl will be affected

cracka wrote:I seem to have upset you.
C grade games would not necessarily have to be moved (if a clubs C grade is playing away for e.g.). Like I said not sure how many clubs have functions on the weekend of a bye so that also not necessarily would effect any programming. As I said would need to look at it in more detail but sh!t don't think it's worth getting upset over, just making suggestions.

Footy Chick wrote:and you're talking about C grade in the D7 thread when you were clearly instructed not to.

See ya pal.

Footy Chick wrote:and you're talking about C grade in the D7 thread when you were clearly instructed not to.

See ya pal.

Q. wrote:

marbles wrote:too little too late for me...

# if North pines are calling for other players from other clubs to be fill ins, they might have looked impressive with J Lane up front but maybe its just pulled the wool over peoples eyes

# wingfield from my last visit to clearances havent had a single clearance listed, and theyre claiming to have 2 teams?

# making a 7 team Div 7r with 12 games now possibly 3 byes a week, is not what players who pay money to play really want from their money, and the likes of magoo morell would be seething at the idea of possibly a month off at a time throughout the season

# shifting salisbury west back up, IF they have 2 sides is only gonna mess with other div fixtures and then destroy social event plans already made by higher clubs

Jamie Lane played at full back. North Pines played with a lot of 2014 a-graders.

I spoke to a couple of our b-graders today and they said they'd rather play in an in evenly matched comp with a few byes, than have a-grade team in there belting everyone.

Yank Man wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:and you're talking about C grade in the D7 thread when you were clearly instructed not to.

See ya pal.

On the precedent thing, Brahma Lodge went from Div 4 to Div 5 and that decision was justified as they failed to win a game and went back to Div 6. They didn't go from 3 to 7 just 6 months after playing in a GF.

Yank Man wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:and you're talking about C grade in the D7 thread when you were clearly instructed not to.

See ya pal.

On the precedent thing, Brahma Lodge went from Div 4 to Div 5 and that decision was justified as they failed to win a game and went back to Div 6. They didn't go from 3 to 7 just 6 months after playing in a GF.

morell wrote:Mitchell Park up by a cutla against OSB Lonsdale over 6 quarters.

Was a good hit out played in good spirits.

Esteban Vihaio wrote:

morell wrote:Mitchell Park up by a cutla against OSB Lonsdale over 6 quarters.

Was a good hit out played in good spirits.

It will be another tough year for OSB i suspect based on that result

marbles wrote:

Esteban Vihaio wrote:

morell wrote:Mitchell Park up by a cutla against OSB Lonsdale over 6 quarters.

Was a good hit out played in good spirits.

It will be another tough year for OSB i suspect based on that result

it would be a tough year for any club whos oval is at the back of a high school and its clubrooms is a 20 metre long tin shed.

panthers wrote:How did he go at full back Q ?

morell wrote:They'll be ok I think. We had some very handy ring ins who all played well. Also fielded a bit of a mixed A/B grade whereas they fielded a very young side for the first 3 quarters.