S Demon wrote:Possible Div 8
Broadview
PAOC
SMOSH
Mitcham
Salisbury
Golden Grove
Unley
North Haven
Gepps Cross unconfirmed
Seaton and Hope Valley are out
As far as I know, Gepps Cross are a starter
by Executive Member » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:29 am
S Demon wrote:Possible Div 8
Broadview
PAOC
SMOSH
Mitcham
Salisbury
Golden Grove
Unley
North Haven
Gepps Cross unconfirmed
Seaton and Hope Valley are out
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:19 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Having played in both I would rather have both sides together. Look at the Big Picture and not your own back yard.
As stated you can still have triple headers!!!! Just work with the other team involved.
By having D8 & D8R it gives sides a chance to get into D7 and vice versa.
by Executive Member » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:16 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Having played in both I would rather have both sides together. Look at the Big Picture and not your own back yard.
As stated you can still have triple headers!!!! Just work with the other team involved.
By having D8 & D8R it gives sides a chance to get into D7 and vice versa.
who's other backyard would i care bout???? i see the big picture and i dont agree with it... simple as that.. i wanna do whats best for my club and chnaging the c grade division is not in its best interest...
i have no problem with the d8 and d8r proposals...
by S Demon » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:49 pm
Executive Member wrote:S Demon wrote:Possible Div 8
Broadview
PAOC
SMOSH
Mitcham
Salisbury
Golden Grove
Unley
North Haven
Gepps Cross unconfirmed
Seaton and Hope Valley are out
As far as I know, Gepps Cross are a starter
by Yank Man » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:06 pm
S Demon wrote:Executive Member wrote:S Demon wrote:Possible Div 8
Broadview
PAOC
SMOSH
Mitcham
Salisbury
Golden Grove
Unley
North Haven
Gepps Cross unconfirmed
Seaton and Hope Valley are out
As far as I know, Gepps Cross are a starter
Broadview
PAOC
SMOSH
Mitcham
Salisbury
Golden Grove
Unley
North Haven
Gepps Cross
by woodublieve12 » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:45 pm
Executive Member wrote:If you have no problems with D8/8R then by default you support the new C Grade concept as one can't exist without the other
For example there will be 9 sides previously in C1-C5 that will no longer be there and then C6 gets abolished
That leaves 4 grades for all other C Grade sides, which then need to be filled
by Footy_Rulz » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:20 am
by TEX07 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:09 pm
Footy_Rulz wrote:I am not sure if this has been mentioned but I found out yesterday that in division 8/8R you are still allowed 7 players on the bench.
by Latte Lad » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:35 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Executive Member wrote:If you have no problems with D8/8R then by default you support the new C Grade concept as one can't exist without the other
For example there will be 9 sides previously in C1-C5 that will no longer be there and then C6 gets abolished
That leaves 4 grades for all other C Grade sides, which then need to be filled
well if thats what you think then, im suddenly not a fan...seriously though my main problem is where plympton are proposed to be, in c2... surely you can see a c4 side (us, hectorville, elizabeth) playing c1, c2 sides from last year is just plain silly... also my proposed c4 comp i suggested in a earlier post were we can have triple headers with 5 or six other sides who play in DIV4, plus the the same thing can happen with the clubs in DIV5 clubs... add in some clubs into the c4 and c5 comps who are at that standard and its solved.... surely common sense will prevail... some clubs dont have enough resources where they can have there c grade side to play else were evry week... and someone said that the saafl are goin to get triple headers every week, but tell me how they can make the c grade play were there A's are majority of weeks???? cant happen.... but with my idea and i know other clubs think the same, majority of weeks the c's will play with there A's.... this shouldnt be that complicated, but it seems to me that saafl and some people on here are making it aot harder then it should be....
as i said earlier if it ain't broke dont fix it!!!
by lutz » Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:49 pm
by S Demon » Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:17 pm
lutz wrote:Are Gaza definitely not having a D grade? Have heard they had 60 on the track this week!
by lutz » Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:31 pm
S Demon wrote:lutz wrote:Are Gaza definitely not having a D grade? Have heard they had 60 on the track this week!
They're listed in C1 and would need quite a few more than 60 to have a D grade
by S Demon » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:03 pm
lutz wrote:S Demon wrote:lutz wrote:Are Gaza definitely not having a D grade? Have heard they had 60 on the track this week!
They're listed in C1 and would need quite a few more than 60 to have a D grade
How many D graders would be out training with the main group at this time of the year?? I don't know Gaza that well, but if they have 60 blokes on the track atm, I would say it's quite plausible that they COULD have a D grade.
by lutz » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:09 pm
S Demon wrote:lutz wrote:S Demon wrote:lutz wrote:Are Gaza definitely not having a D grade? Have heard they had 60 on the track this week!
They're listed in C1 and would need quite a few more than 60 to have a D grade
How many D graders would be out training with the main group at this time of the year?? I don't know Gaza that well, but if they have 60 blokes on the track atm, I would say it's quite plausible that they COULD have a D grade.
You're probably right. But with cut off being 27th January to nominate all your sides without copping a $500 fine, I guess its a bit tough to make the call then unless there's 90 out on the track already...
by The Dark Knight » Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:37 pm
S Demon wrote:Executive Member wrote:S Demon wrote:Possible Div 8
Broadview
PAOC
SMOSH
Mitcham
Salisbury
Golden Grove
Unley
North Haven
Gepps Cross unconfirmed
Seaton and Hope Valley are out
As far as I know, Gepps Cross are a starter
Broadview
PAOC
SMOSH
Mitcham
Salisbury
Golden Grove
Unley
North Haven
Gepps Cross
by Hellboy » Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:43 pm
Boosh wrote:Masha wrote:Boosh wrote:D8/8R
•Broadview
•Gepps Cross
•PAOC
•Flinders Park
•SMOSH
•Mitcham
•Salisbury
•Hope Valley (new)
•Golden Grove
•Unley (new)
•Seaton (new)
What is the likelyhood of all these teams getting 4 sides? As it stands our club need one of these to not have four sides in order for us to have a D Grade
I was led to believe by a member of the executive, that Div 8/8R will have as many sides in it that have 4 teams, so it could end up having 12 sides even though you wont play all sides twice??
I hope that turns out to be true because North Haven have been told that we cannot have a fourth side
by Boosh » Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:29 pm
by Jetters » Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:10 pm
by Demon Juke » Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:48 pm
Jetters wrote:How many players training at this stage of the year do you think would indicate that you would have numbers for a 'D' grade??
by The Cows » Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:51 pm
Latte Lad wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Executive Member wrote:If you have no problems with D8/8R then by default you support the new C Grade concept as one can't exist without the other
For example there will be 9 sides previously in C1-C5 that will no longer be there and then C6 gets abolished
That leaves 4 grades for all other C Grade sides, which then need to be filled
well if thats what you think then, im suddenly not a fan...seriously though my main problem is where plympton are proposed to be, in c2... surely you can see a c4 side (us, hectorville, elizabeth) playing c1, c2 sides from last year is just plain silly... also my proposed c4 comp i suggested in a earlier post were we can have triple headers with 5 or six other sides who play in DIV4, plus the the same thing can happen with the clubs in DIV5 clubs... add in some clubs into the c4 and c5 comps who are at that standard and its solved.... surely common sense will prevail... some clubs dont have enough resources where they can have there c grade side to play else were evry week... and someone said that the saafl are goin to get triple headers every week, but tell me how they can make the c grade play were there A's are majority of weeks???? cant happen.... but with my idea and i know other clubs think the same, majority of weeks the c's will play with there A's.... this shouldnt be that complicated, but it seems to me that saafl and some people on here are making it aot harder then it should be....
as i said earlier if it ain't broke dont fix it!!!
Having been involved in C Grade footy for years, and in the last 4 years winning flags in C4, C3 and C2, I can tell you are toughest year was in C4 when we beat GG in the GF. There is no obvious difference between C4 and above, it purely depends on the depth of the clubs higher grades. A good C5 side could easily play C1 or C2, and vice versa, and C1 side could also struggle in lower grades.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |