by laser » Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:26 pm
by BenchedEagle » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:30 am
by Mr Beefy » Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:25 am
laser wrote:Scuttlebutt Beefy, Lord of the Rosewater Taj and Laser aint no Toff !
by woodublieve12 » Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:52 am
duncs wrote:Pretty crappy canteen and terrible parking at Unley. Matches Jetters umpiring
by heater31 » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:05 am
woodublieve12 wrote:duncs wrote:Pretty crappy canteen and terrible parking at Unley. Matches Jetters umpiring
worst in D4...
by woodublieve12 » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:08 am
by Choccies » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:18 am
Jetters wrote:turk186 wrote:Johno6 wrote:i didnt think that was possible?
so is there a game after?
I'm with you Johno.... I thought game would be played where Unley and SWest do battle,
so no game before the A's (at Unley I assume) ?? dont think Jets would be happy about that...really limits how much the bar and canteen can return... unless they get a discount for the home final fee ???
I'm confused....mind you thats not hard
We are very happy about it. Saves us $500 and means we dont have to worry about policing opposition sides supporters bringing there own booze into the game. Definately don't make the money back from them.
by zedman » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:46 am
heater31 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:duncs wrote:Pretty crappy canteen and terrible parking at Unley. Matches Jetters umpiring
worst in D4...
Pulteney would be stoked at that statement
Also for those with facebook get on to the SAAFL memes page couple of very funny posts already....
by Jetters » Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:09 am
woodublieve12 wrote:duncs wrote:Pretty crappy canteen and terrible parking at Unley. Matches Jetters umpiring
worst in D4...
by Jetters » Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:12 am
Choccies wrote:Jetters wrote:turk186 wrote:Johno6 wrote:i didnt think that was possible?
so is there a game after?
I'm with you Johno.... I thought game would be played where Unley and SWest do battle,
so no game before the A's (at Unley I assume) ?? dont think Jets would be happy about that...really limits how much the bar and canteen can return... unless they get a discount for the home final fee ???
I'm confused....mind you thats not hard
We are very happy about it. Saves us $500 and means we dont have to worry about policing opposition sides supporters bringing there own booze into the game. Definately don't make the money back from them.
Is that your biggest concern Jetters ???
by Choccies » Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:28 am
by Bluedemon » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:00 pm
Choccies wrote:Why does it not make sense to get money off 3 opposition teams ?? Did you have to pay to host the game ?
by Jetters » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:27 pm
Choccies wrote:Why does it not make sense to get money off 3 opposition teams ?? Did you have to pay to host the game ?
by S Demon » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:34 pm
Jetters wrote:Choccies wrote:Why does it not make sense to get money off 3 opposition teams ?? Did you have to pay to host the game ?
3 opposition teams? Pretty sure the standard match only comprises of 2.
Yes.
by S Demon » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:37 pm
Jetters wrote:Well, aside from losing this weekend and ruining a years effort.
It does not make financial or practical sense to host a neutral 2s game.
by Hefty » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:39 pm
S Demon wrote:Jetters wrote:Well, aside from losing this weekend and ruining a years effort.
It does not make financial or practical sense to host a neutral 2s game.
I'm confused? Why doesn't it make sense to have 44 extra players + officials + supporters potentially spending $5 - $10 each?
by GEESKIP » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:44 pm
Bluedemon wrote:Choccies wrote:Why does it not make sense to get money off 3 opposition teams ?? Did you have to pay to host the game ?
Elizabeth would now have to pay for their Div 4R game.
by zedman » Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:48 pm
S Demon wrote:Jetters wrote:Well, aside from losing this weekend and ruining a years effort.
It does not make financial or practical sense to host a neutral 2s game.
I'm confused? Why doesn't it make sense to have 44 extra players + officials + supporters potentially spending $5 - $10 each?
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Sep 05, 2012 1:00 pm
zedman wrote:S Demon wrote:Jetters wrote:Well, aside from losing this weekend and ruining a years effort.
It does not make financial or practical sense to host a neutral 2s game.
I'm confused? Why doesn't it make sense to have 44 extra players + officials + supporters potentially spending $5 - $10 each?
maybe they are worried the undersized, east west running oval might get a bit boggy after a B grade game..
going to pop down for a peep and see what all the noise is about..
what grade is greeny playing in jetters?
by Jetters » Wed Sep 05, 2012 1:10 pm
zedman wrote:S Demon wrote:Jetters wrote:Well, aside from losing this weekend and ruining a years effort.
It does not make financial or practical sense to host a neutral 2s game.
I'm confused? Why doesn't it make sense to have 44 extra players + officials + supporters potentially spending $5 - $10 each?
maybe they are worried the undersized, east west running oval might get a bit boggy after a B grade game..
going to pop down for a peep and see what all the noise is about..
what grade is greeny playing in jetters?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |